NAXSI open source WAF logo

NAXSI

by Open Source (community-maintained fork by wargio)

Free Tier Available Open Source
3.4
WAFPlanet Rating

A lightweight, open source WAF module for NGINX that uses a scoring-based approach instead of signature matching, blocking attacks by detecting suspicious patterns rather than maintaining a vulnerability database.

Company: Open Source (community-maintained fork by wargio)
Pricing: Free (Open Source, GPLv3)
Founded: 2011

Overview

NAXSI (Nginx Anti XSS & SQL Injection) is an open source web application firewall that runs as a third-party module inside NGINX. Unlike signature-based WAFs that maintain databases of known attack patterns, NAXSI uses a scoring system that evaluates requests against a small set of generic rules covering the vast majority of web attack patterns.

The project takes a deny-by-default approach. Characters and patterns commonly associated with attacks (angle brackets, SQL keywords, pipe characters) are flagged and scored. When a request exceeds the configured score threshold, it gets blocked. Legitimate requests that trigger false positives are handled through whitelisting rules, which can be generated automatically through a learning mode.

Originally developed by NBS System, the project was archived in November 2023. Development continues under an active fork maintained by Giovanni Dante Grazioli (wargio), who was the last active developer on the original project. The fork receives regular updates and maintains compatibility with current NGINX versions.

NAXSI is written in C and depends only on libpcre for regex support. It runs on most UNIX-like systems including Linux, FreeBSD, OpenBSD, and NetBSD. Its minimal footprint and tight NGINX integration make it a practical choice for teams that already run NGINX and want inline WAF protection without adding another proxy layer.

Ratings Breakdown

Ease of Use 2.8/5
Value for Money 4.5/5
Customer Support 2.5/5
Features 3.2/5

Key Features

Scoring-Based Detection

Assigns scores to suspicious patterns in requests. Blocks when the cumulative score exceeds a threshold, rather than relying on exact signature matches.

Learning Mode

Monitors traffic and automatically generates whitelist rules for legitimate application behavior, reducing manual tuning effort during initial deployment.

Virtual Patching

Apply custom rules to block specific vulnerabilities without modifying application code. Rules target raw requests or specific fields like headers, args, and body.

Deny-by-Default

Operates like a DROP firewall. Common attack characters and patterns are blocked unless explicitly whitelisted for the target application.

Lightweight Footprint

Written in C with only libpcre as a dependency. Adds minimal overhead to NGINX request processing.

Dynamic Module Support

Can be compiled as a dynamic NGINX module, allowing it to be loaded without recompiling NGINX from source.

Pros & Cons

Pros

  • Completely free and open source

    GPLv3 licensed with no paid tiers. Zero cost beyond infrastructure and administration time.

  • Minimal resource usage

    Tiny C module with one dependency. Adds negligible latency compared to heavier WAF solutions.

  • Not signature-dependent

    Generic pattern scoring means unknown attacks are still caught if they use suspicious characters or structures.

  • Learning mode reduces tuning time

    Auto-generates whitelists from real traffic, making initial deployment faster than writing rules by hand.

  • Tight NGINX integration

    Runs inside NGINX as a module. No extra proxy hop, no separate service to manage.

Cons

  • NGINX only

    No support for Apache, IIS, Envoy, or other web servers. If you switch off NGINX, you lose your WAF.

  • Community-maintained fork

    The original project was archived. The active fork has a single primary maintainer, which is a bus factor risk.

  • No management UI

    Configuration is entirely file-based. No dashboard, no centralized management, no analytics out of the box.

  • Whitelist maintenance burden

    The deny-by-default model means every legitimate edge case needs a whitelist rule. Complex applications require ongoing tuning.

  • Smaller ecosystem than ModSecurity

    Fewer third-party integrations, smaller community, and no equivalent of the OWASP Core Rule Set.

Pricing

Pricing model: Free (Open Source, GPLv3)

Open Source

Free

Full WAF module, self-managed

  • Scoring-based attack detection
  • Auto-learning / whitelist generation
  • Virtual patching support
  • NGINX dynamic module
  • Community support via GitHub Issues

Our Verdict

NAXSI fills a specific niche well. If you run NGINX and want a minimal, free WAF that catches common attack patterns without the complexity of ModSecurity rule language, it delivers. The scoring approach is elegant and the learning mode helps with initial deployment. But the single-maintainer fork status, NGINX-only limitation, and lack of any management tooling mean it is best suited for teams comfortable with hands-on configuration and monitoring. For most production environments, ModSecurity with CRS or a managed solution will be a safer long-term bet.

CVE Coverage

NAXSI can detect and block attacks matching 85K+ known CVEs based on its supported rule sets.

13K+
Critical
17K+
High
34K+
Medium
483
Low

Coverage by Attack Type

15K+ CVEs
8.7K+ CVEs
6.9K+ CVEs
5.4K+ CVEs
4.2K+ CVEs
4K+ CVEs
3.2K+ CVEs
Open Redirect Medium
1.4K+ CVEs
1.2K+ CVEs

Latest Blockable CVEs

CVE Severity
CVE-2026-6603 HIGH
CVE-2026-6602 HIGH
CVE-2026-6600 LOW
CVE-2026-32963 UNKNOWN
CVE-2026-6596 HIGH
CVE-2026-6595 HIGH
CVE-2026-6594 HIGH
CVE-2026-6593 LOW
CVE-2026-6592 LOW
CVE-2026-6591 MEDIUM

Frequently Asked Questions

Is NAXSI still maintained?

The original NAXSI repository by NBS System was officially archived in November 2023. However, development continues actively in a fork maintained by Giovanni Dante Grazioli (wargio), who was the last active developer on the original project. The fork receives regular updates, bug fixes, and maintains compatibility with current NGINX versions.

That said, the project has a single primary maintainer, which is a bus factor risk worth considering for production deployments. If long-term maintenance certainty is important to you, ModSecurity or Coraza have larger contributor communities.

How does NAXSI compare to ModSecurity?

NAXSI and ModSecurity take fundamentally different approaches to WAF protection. NAXSI uses a scoring-based model with a small set of generic rules that flag suspicious patterns (SQL keywords, angle brackets, pipe characters) and blocks requests when the cumulative score exceeds a threshold. ModSecurity uses the SecRule language, which allows highly specific pattern matching, and benefits from the OWASP Core Rule Set (CRS) with thousands of curated rules.

In practice, NAXSI is lighter and faster to get running. You deploy it, enable learning mode, generate whitelists, and you are protected. ModSecurity requires more expertise to configure but gives you far more granular control. For most production environments, ModSecurity with CRS is the safer long-term choice. NAXSI shines when you want minimal overhead and a simple deny-by-default model. See the full ModSecurity vs NAXSI comparison.

How does NAXSI compare to Coraza?

Coraza is a modern, Go-based WAF engine that is fully compatible with the OWASP Core Rule Set. It supports NGINX (via Coraza NGINX module), Envoy, Traefik, and can run as a standalone proxy. NAXSI is a C module exclusively for NGINX with its own rule format.

If you need CRS compatibility, multi-platform support, or a more actively maintained ecosystem, Coraza is the stronger choice. If you want the lightest possible NGINX module with minimal dependencies and a simple scoring model, NAXSI still has a place. See the full Coraza vs NAXSI comparison.

Can NAXSI work with Apache or other web servers?

No. NAXSI is built specifically as an NGINX module and cannot run on any other web server. If you need WAF protection for Apache, your main options are ModSecurity (the original Apache WAF module) or a cloud-based WAF like Cloudflare that sits in front of your server regardless of what it runs.

For environments running multiple web servers or planning to migrate away from NGINX, Coraza offers broader platform support while maintaining compatibility with standard WAF rule sets. For a full overview of NGINX-compatible options, see our Best WAF for NGINX guide.

Does NAXSI support the OWASP Core Rule Set?

No. NAXSI uses its own rule format and scoring system, which is completely incompatible with the OWASP CRS. It ships with a default set of core rules (often called naxsi_core.rules) that cover common attack patterns like XSS, SQL injection, and file inclusion by assigning scores to suspicious characters and keywords.

This is a fundamental architectural difference. CRS-compatible WAFs like ModSecurity and Coraza benefit from a community-maintained rule set with thousands of rules covering specific CVEs, evasion techniques, and application-level attacks. NAXSI trades that breadth for simplicity: fewer rules, less maintenance, but also less coverage of edge cases.

Can I use NAXSI with WordPress?

Yes, NAXSI works with WordPress since it operates at the NGINX level, inspecting all HTTP requests before they reach PHP. However, WordPress generates complex request patterns (admin-ajax.php, REST API, block editor, plugin-specific queries) that will trigger false positives with NAXSI's deny-by-default approach. You will need to invest time in learning mode and whitelist tuning to avoid blocking legitimate WordPress functionality.

If your primary goal is WordPress protection, dedicated WordPress WAF plugins like Wordfence or NinjaFirewall are purpose-built for WordPress and require far less tuning. See our Best WAF for WordPress guide for a full comparison.

Ready to try NAXSI?

Start with the free tier and upgrade as you grow.