CVE Database - CSRF

Browse known vulnerabilities with WAF coverage analysis. See which CVEs are detectable by Web Application Firewalls and their OWASP CRS rules.

9303
Matching CVEs
16133
Critical
35026
High
84348
High WAF Coverage

CVE-2026-30807

HIGH
8.80 CVSS 3.1

Cross-Site Request Forgery vulnerability allows an attacker to perform unauthorized actions via crafted web page. This issue affects Pandora FMS: from 777 through 800

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)
WAF: Low

CVE-2026-7616

MEDIUM
4.30 CVSS 3.1

The Zawgyi Embed plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 2.1.1. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the zawgyi_adminpage function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update the plugin's zawgyi_forceCSS setting by submitting a forged POST request to options-general.php?page=zawgyi_embed via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)
WAF: Low

CVE-2026-7562

MEDIUM
4.30 CVSS 3.1

The WP-Redirection plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to and including 1.0.3. This is due to the absence of a nonce field in the admin settings form and the lack of any nonce verification (via check_admin_referer() or wp_verify_nonce()) in the displayWPRedirectionManagementPage() function before processing POST requests that add, edit, or delete URL redirection rules. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to trick a logged-in administrator into clicking a crafted link, causing the attacker to create, modify, or delete redirection records in the plugin's database table without the administrator's consent.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)
WAF: Low

CVE-2026-7561

MEDIUM
6.10 CVSS 3.1

The Tm – WordPress Redirection plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.2. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on a function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update settings and inject malicious web scripts via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)
WAF: Low

CVE-2026-6932

MEDIUM
4.30 CVSS 3.1

The Woo Commerce Minimum Weight plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to and including 3.0.1. This is due to missing nonce verification on the settings update handler in edit-weight.php. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to modify the minimum order weight setting by tricking a site administrator into clicking a link or visiting an attacker-controlled page containing a forged POST request.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)
WAF: Low

CVE-2026-6710

MEDIUM
4.30 CVSS 3.1

The Skysa Text Ticker App plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.4. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the SkysaApps_Admin_AppPage function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to trick a site administrator into making a forged request to modify the plugin's settings, including the scrolling message text and URL, via a forged cross-site request via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)
WAF: Low

CVE-2026-45430

UNKNOWN
0.00 CVSS none

The Salesforce module before 1.x-1.0.1 for Backdrop CMS does not properly use a random state parameter to protect the authorization flow against CSRF attacks.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)
WAF: Low

CVE-2026-0502

MEDIUM
5.40 CVSS 3.1

Due to insufficient CSRF protection in SAP BusinessObjects Business Intelligence Platform ,an authenticated user could be tricked by an attacker to send unintended requests to the web server. This has low impact on integrity and availability of the application. There is no impact on confidentiality of the data.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)
WAF: Low

CVE-2026-44695

MEDIUM
6.50 CVSS 3.1

Outline is a service that allows for collaborative documentation. Prior to 1.7.1, the Slack integration callback for GET /auth/slack.post accepts an unsigned, session-independent OAuth state value. A third party who can obtain a Slack OAuth code for the same Outline Slack client can make a logged-in Outline user complete the callback and link that user's Outline account to the attacker's Slack team_id and user_id. The linked Slack identity can then use the Slack /outline search command as the victim Outline user. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.7.1.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)
WAF: Low

CVE-2026-43877

UNKNOWN
0.00 CVSS none

WWBN AVideo is an open source video platform. In versions up to and including 29.0, objects/userSavePhoto.php is a legacy profile-photo endpoint that accepts a base64 POST parameter and writes the decoded bytes to videos/userPhoto/photo<users_id>.png. Its only access control is User::isLogged(). It does not end in .json.php, so it is excluded from the project's global autoCSRFGuard (which is suffix-scoped in objects/include_config.php). There is no CSRF token, no Origin/Referer check, and no MIME validation of the decoded bytes. Because AVideo's default cookie policy is SameSite=None; Secure on HTTPS (objects/functionsPHP.php:227), an attacker who lures a logged-in user to a malicious page can overwrite that user's profile photo with arbitrary bytes and also triggers a site-wide clearCache(true) on every forged request. Commit 9c38468041505e637101c5943c5370c68f48e3ac contains an updated fix.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)
WAF: Low

CVE-2026-38566

UNKNOWN
0.00 CVSS none

HireFlow v1.2 does not implement CSRF token validation on any state-changing POST endpoint. All forms (password change at /profile, candidate deletion at /candidates/delete/<id>, feedback submission at /feedback/add/<id>, interview scheduling at /interviews/add) are vulnerable to CSRF. An attacker who can trick an authenticated user into visiting a malicious page can silently change the victim's password, delete records, or inject arbitrary data on their behalf. The SESSION_COOKIE_SAMESITE attribute is also not configured, removing the browser-level CSRF defense.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)
WAF: Low

CVE-2022-50955

MEDIUM
4.30 CVSS 3.1

WordPress Plugin Curtain 1.0.2 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability that allows attackers to activate or deactivate site maintenance mode by crafting malicious requests. Attackers can trick authenticated administrators into submitting forged requests to the options-general.php page with curtain parameters to toggle maintenance mode without valid nonce validation.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)
WAF: Low

CVE-2021-47953

MEDIUM
4.30 CVSS 3.1

OpenCart 3.0.3.7 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability that allows attackers to change user passwords by sending crafted requests to the account/password endpoint. Attackers can trick authenticated users into submitting hidden forms with new password values in the 'password' and 'confirm' parameters to hijack accounts.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)
WAF: Low

CVE-2021-47946

UNKNOWN
0.00 CVSS none

OpenCart 3.0.3.6 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability in the /account/edit endpoint that allows unauthenticated attackers to modify victim account details by tricking users into visiting malicious pages. Attackers can craft CSRF payloads that change victim email addresses and account information, then use password reset functionality to gain unauthorized access to compromised accounts.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)
WAF: Low

CVE-2026-8194

MEDIUM
4.30 CVSS 3.1

A security vulnerability has been detected in osTicket up to 1.18.3. Impacted is an unknown function of the file include/class.dispatcher.php of the component Dispatcher. The manipulation of the argument _method leads to cross-site request forgery. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used. The project was informed of the problem early through a pull request but has not reacted yet.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) Missing Authorization
WAF: Low

CVE-2026-42286

UNKNOWN
0.00 CVSS none

Emlog is an open source website building system. Prior to version 2.6.11, missing CSRF protection in critical admin functions allows attackers to trick authenticated administrators into performing unauthorized actions like system registration, plugin management, and configuration changes. This issue has been patched in version 2.6.11.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)
WAF: Low

CVE-2026-42190

UNKNOWN
0.00 CVSS none

RedwoodSDK is a server-first React framework. From version 1.0.0-beta.50 to before version 1.2.3, server actions in rwsdk apply HTTP method enforcement but no origin validation. A request originating from a different origin that the browser treats as same-site can invoke a server action with the victim's session cookie attached. This issue has been patched in version 1.2.3.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)
WAF: Low

CVE-2026-5791

MEDIUM
6.50 CVSS 3.1

Cross-Site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in DivvyDrive Information Technologies Inc. DivvyDrive allows Cross Site Request Forgery. This issue affects DivvyDrive: from 4.8.2.9 before 4.8.3.2.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)
WAF: Low

CVE-2026-28201

HIGH
7.80 CVSS 3.1

An improper input validation, together with an overly permissive default CORS configuration in Open Notebook v1.8.1 allows remote attacker to trick a legitimate user to alter or delete arbitrary database entries via specially crafted malicious URL. Depending on the deployment, data exfiltration is also possible.

Improper Input Validation Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)
WAF: Medium

CVE-2026-27415

UNKNOWN
0.00 CVSS none

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in PluginUs.Net BEAR allows Cross Site Request Forgery. This issue affects BEAR: from n/a through 1.1.5.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)
WAF: Low

CVE-2025-68604

UNKNOWN
0.00 CVSS none

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in WPGraphQL allows Cross Site Request Forgery. This issue affects WPGraphQL: from n/a through 2.5.3.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)
WAF: Low

CVE-2026-41663

UNKNOWN
0.00 CVSS none

Admidio is an open-source user management solution. Prior to version 5.0.9, several administrative operations in Admidio's preferences module (database backup, test email, htaccess generation) fire via GET requests with no CSRF token validation. Because SameSite=Lax cookies travel with top-level GET navigations, an attacker forces an authenticated admin to trigger these actions from a malicious page. This issue has been patched in version 5.0.9.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)
WAF: Low

CVE-2026-40326

UNKNOWN
0.00 CVSS none

Masa CMS is a content management system forked from Mura CMS. In versions 7.5.2 and earlier, the createBundle method in `csettings.cfc` does not properly validate anti-CSRF tokens for site bundle creation requests. An attacker can craft a malicious webpage or link that, when visited by a logged-in administrator, triggers the silent creation of a comprehensive site bundle. This bundle is saved to a predictable, publicly accessible web directory. An unauthenticated attacker can then retrieve the bundle and obtain site content, user account data, password hashes, form submissions, email lists, plugins, and configuration data. This issue has been fixed in versions 7.2.10, 7.3.15, 7.4.10, and 7.5.3. As a workaround, remove unexpected bundle files from public directories, restrict access to the affected endpoint, and limit exposure of administrative sessions.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)
WAF: Low

CVE-2026-40325

UNKNOWN
0.00 CVSS none

Masa CMS is a content management system forked from Mura CMS. In versions 7.5.2 and earlier, the `cTrash.restore` function does not properly validate anti-CSRF tokens for content restoration requests. An attacker can trick a logged-in administrator to submit a forged request that restores deleted items from the trash and places them at an attacker-controlled location in the site structure through the parentid parameter. This can restore previously deleted malicious or outdated content, expose sensitive documents by moving them into publicly accessible locations, and disrupt site structure or content integrity. This issue has been fixed in versions 7.2.10, 7.3.15, 7.4.10, and 7.5.3. As a workaround, restrict access to the administrative backend, use browser isolation for administrative sessions, and regularly empty the trash to reduce the amount of content available for unauthorized restoration.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)
WAF: Low

CVE-2026-40309

UNKNOWN
0.00 CVSS none

Masa CMS is a content management system forked from Mura CMS. In versions 7.5.2 and earlier, the cTrash.empty function does not validate anti-CSRF tokens for trash management requests. An attacker can induce a logged-in administrator to submit a forged request that empties the trash and permanently deletes all deleted content. This can cause irreversible data loss and disrupt recovery of content intended for restoration. This issue has been fixed in versions 7.2.10, 7.3.15, 7.4.10, and 7.5.3. As a workaround, restrict access to the administrative backend, use browser isolation for administrative sessions, and maintain current database backups to recover from unauthorized deletion.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)
WAF: Low

CVE-2026-40174

UNKNOWN
0.00 CVSS none

Masa CMS is a content management system forked from Mura CMS. In versions 7.5.2 and earlier, the cUsers.updateAddress function does not properly validate anti-CSRF tokens for user address management operations. An attacker can induce a logged-in administrator to submit a forged request that adds, modifies, or deletes user address records, including email addresses and phone numbers. This can be used to alter contact information, redirect organizational communications, and corrupt address data in the user directory. This issue has been fixed in versions 7.2.10, 7.3.15, 7.4.10, and 7.5.3. As a workaround, restrict access to the administrative backend, use browser isolation for administrative sessions, or deploy filtering rules to block forged requests to the affected endpoint

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)
WAF: Low

CVE-2026-8022

UNKNOWN
0.00 CVSS none

Inappropriate implementation in MHTML in Google Chrome prior to 148.0.7778.96 allowed a remote attacker who convinced a user to engage in specific UI gestures to leak cross-origin data via a crafted MHTML page. (Chromium security severity: Low)

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)
WAF: Low

CVE-2025-31957

MEDIUM
5.70 CVSS 3.1

HHCL BigFix Service Management (SM) is affected by a Cross‑Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability. This could lead to unauthorized changes or exposure of sensitive data.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)
WAF: Low

CVE-2026-6702

MEDIUM
6.10 CVSS 3.1

The Publish 2 Ping.fm plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.1. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the '/wp-admin/options-general.php?page=admin.php' page. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update settings and inject malicious web scripts via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)
WAF: Low

CVE-2026-6701

MEDIUM
4.30 CVSS 3.1

The addfreespace plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 0.1.3. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on a function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update settings and inject malicious web scripts via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)
WAF: Low

CVE-2026-6700

MEDIUM
4.30 CVSS 3.1

The DX Sources plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 2.0.1. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the settings_page_build function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to trick a logged-in administrator into submitting a forged request that modifies the plugin's configuration options via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)
WAF: Low

CVE-2026-42091

UNKNOWN
0.00 CVSS none

goshs is a SimpleHTTPServer written in Go. Prior to version 2.0.2, the PUT upload handler (httpserver/updown.go) lacks the CSRF token validation that was added to the POST upload handler during the CVE-2026-40883 fix. Combined with the unconditional Access-Control-Allow-Origin: * on the OPTIONS preflight handler (httpserver/server.go), any website can write arbitrary files to a goshs instance through the victim's browser — bypassing network isolation (e.g. localhost, internal network). This issue has been patched in version 2.0.2.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)
WAF: Low

CVE-2026-3772

HIGH
8.80 CVSS 3.1

The WP Editor plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.2.9.2. This is due to missing nonce verification in the 'add_plugins_page' and 'add_themes_page' functions. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to overwrite arbitrary plugin and theme PHP files with attacker-controlled code via a forged request, granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking a link.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)
WAF: Low

CVE-2026-3140

MEDIUM
4.30 CVSS 3.1

The Ultimate Dashboard plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 3.8.14. This is due to a flawed nonce validation conditional in the 'handle_module_actions' function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to toggle plugin modules on or off via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)
WAF: Low

CVE-2026-36960

UNKNOWN
0.00 CVSS none

A Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exists in the web management interface of the U-SPEED N300 Rounter V1.0.0. The device does not implement CSRF protection mechanisms such as anti-CSRF tokens or strict Origin/Referer validation for administrative API endpoints. An attacker can craft a malicious webpage that sends forged HTTP requests to configuration endpoints. If an authenticated administrator visits the malicious webpage, the victim's browser automatically includes the valid session cookie in the request, allowing the router to process the request as a legitimate administrative action.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)
WAF: Low

CVE-2026-36956

UNKNOWN
0.00 CVSS none

A Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exists in the web management interface of the Dbit N300 T1 Pro wireless router V1.0.0. The router fails to implement proper CSRF protection mechanisms such as anti-CSRF tokens or strict Origin/Referer validation for administrative API endpoints. An attacker can craft a malicious webpage that sends forged HTTP requests to configuration endpoints such as /api/setWlan. If an authenticated administrator visits the malicious webpage, the victim's browser automatically includes the valid session cookie in the request, allowing the router to process the request as a legitimate administrative action.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)
WAF: Low

CVE-2018-25310

UNKNOWN
0.00 CVSS none

VideoFlow Digital Video Protection DVP 2.10 contains an authenticated remote code execution vulnerability that allows authenticated attackers to execute arbitrary system commands by exploiting a cross-site request forgery flaw in the web management interface. Attackers with valid credentials can leverage the CSRF vulnerability to inject and execute system commands through the Tools > System > Shell interface, gaining root-level access to the device.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)
WAF: Low

CVE-2018-25298

MEDIUM
5.30 CVSS 3.1

Merge PACS 7.0 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability that allows attackers to perform unauthorized actions by crafting malicious HTML forms targeting the merge-viewer endpoint. Attackers can submit POST requests to /servlet/actions/merge-viewer/summary with login credentials to hijack user sessions and gain unauthorized access to the PACS system.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)
WAF: Low

CVE-2026-42645

UNKNOWN
0.00 CVSS none

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Dmitry V. (CEO of "UKR Solution") Barcode Scanner with Inventory & Order Manager barcode-scanner-lite-pos-to-manage-products-inventory-and-orders allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Barcode Scanner with Inventory & Order Manager: from n/a through <= 1.11.0.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)
WAF: Low

CVE-2026-38934

UNKNOWN
0.00 CVSS none

Cross Site Request Forgery vulnerability in diskoverdata diskover-community v.2.3.5. and before allows a remote attacker to escalate privileges and obtain sensitive information via the public/settings_process.php

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)
WAF: Low

CVE-2026-7108

MEDIUM
4.30 CVSS 3.1

A security vulnerability has been detected in code-projects Invoice System in Laravel 1.0. This affects an unknown function. Such manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) Missing Authorization
WAF: Low

CVE-2026-41425

UNKNOWN
0.00 CVSS none

Authlib is a Python library which builds OAuth and OpenID Connect servers. Prior to 1.6.11, there is no CSRF protection on the cache feature in authlib.integrations.starlette_client.OAuth. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.6.11.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)
WAF: Low

CVE-2026-3565

MEDIUM
4.30 CVSS 3.1

The Taqnix plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.0.3. This is due to a missing nonce verification in the taqnix_delete_my_account() function, where the check_ajax_referer() call is explicitly commented out on line 883. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to trick a logged-in non-administrator user into deleting their own account via a forged request granted they can trick the user into performing an action such as clicking a link or visiting a malicious page.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)
WAF: Low

CVE-2026-41317

HIGH
7.50 CVSS 3.1

Press, a Frappe custom app that runs Frappe Cloud, manages infrastructure, subscription, marketplace, and software-as-a-service (SaaS).`press.api.account.create_api_secret` is prone to CSRF-like exploits. This endpoint writes to database and it is also accessible via GET method. The patch in commit 52ea2f2d1b587be0807557e96f025f47897d00fd restricts method to POST.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)
WAF: Low

CVE-2026-27841

UNKNOWN
0.00 CVSS none

A vulnerability in SenseLive X3050's web management interface allows state-changing operations to be triggered without proper Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) protections. Because the application does not enforce server-side validation of request origin or implement CSRF tokens, a malicious external webpage could cause a user's browser to submit unauthorized configuration requests to the device.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)
WAF: Low

CVE-2026-41347

UNKNOWN
0.00 CVSS none

OpenClaw before 2026.3.31 lacks browser-origin validation in HTTP operator endpoints when operating in trusted-proxy mode, allowing cross-site request forgery attacks. Attackers can exploit this by sending malicious requests from a browser in trusted-proxy deployments to perform unauthorized actions on HTTP operator endpoints.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)
WAF: Low

CVE-2026-40471

UNKNOWN
0.00 CVSS none

hackage-server lacked Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) protection across its endpoints. Scripts on foreign sites could trigger requests to hackage server, possibly abusing latent credentials to upload packages or perform other administrative actions. Some unauthenticated actions could also be abused (e.g. creating new user accounts).

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)
WAF: Low

CVE-2026-4922

UNKNOWN
0.00 CVSS none

GitLab has remediated an issue in GitLab CE/EE affecting all versions from 17.0 before 18.9.6, 18.10 before 18.10.4, and 18.11 before 18.11.1 that could have allowed an unauthenticated user to execute GraphQL mutations on behalf of authenticated users due to insufficient CSRF protection.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)
WAF: Low

CVE-2025-58922

UNKNOWN
0.00 CVSS none

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in ThemeFusion Avada allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Avada: from n/a before 7.13.2.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)
WAF: Low

CVE-2026-6396

MEDIUM
4.30 CVSS 3.1

The Fast & Fancy Filter – 3F plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to and including 1.2.2. This is due to missing nonce verification in the saveFields() function, which handles the fff_save_settins AJAX action. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to modify plugin filter settings, update arbitrary options, or create new filter posts via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)
WAF: Low
Page 4 of 187 (9303 CVEs)