Myra Hyperscale WAF vs SiteLock TrueShield

Myra Hyperscale WAF and SiteLock TrueShield serve different market segments. Your organization's size, budget, and security requirements will determine which is the better fit.

Note: Myra Hyperscale WAF and SiteLock TrueShield target different market segments. This comparison highlights the trade-offs between solutions designed for different organizational sizes.

Overview

Myra Hyperscale WAF and SiteLock TrueShield are both popular web application firewall solutions. This comparison will help you understand the key differences and choose the right one for your needs.

German-made, GDPR-compliant cloud WAF built for critical infrastructure and regulated industries. BSI-qualified, NIS-2 and DORA compliant. Managed WAF service available. Blocks 8M+ malicious L7 requests per customer per year. Data processing exclusively in Germany on request.

Cloud-based WAF designed for small businesses and shared hosting, offering simple setup and affordable web application protection.

Quick Comparison

Feature Myra Hyperscale WAF SiteLock TrueShield
Overall Rating 3.7/5 3.0/5
Free Tier No No
Pricing Model Custom (quote-based) Monthly subscription
Ease of Use 4.0/5 4.2/5
Value for Money 3.2/5 3.0/5
Support 4.5/5 3.0/5
Platforms Any origin (own data center, cloud, hosting provider). Compatible with AWS, Azure, GCP, on-premises, and hybrid deployments via DNS-based integration. Any web application (DNS-based), cPanel, WordPress, Joomla
Compliance BSI-qualified (C5 Type 2), ISO 27001, PCI DSS, NIS-2 compliant, DORA compliant, GDPR compliant, IT-Grundschutz, SOC 2 Type 2 PCI DSS scanning

Pricing Comparison

Myra Hyperscale WAF

Model: Custom (quote-based)

Myra WAF

Custom

Managed WAF Service

Custom (add-on)

View full pricing →

SiteLock TrueShield

Model: Monthly subscription

Basic

From $19.99/month

Pro

From $29.99/month

Business

From $44.99/month

View full pricing →

Features Comparison

Myra Hyperscale WAF

  • OWASP Top 10 Protection

    Blocks SQL injection, XSS, CSRF, and other OWASP Top 10 attacks. Blocks an average of 8 million malicious layer 7 requests per customer per year.

  • HTTP/S Request Filtering

    Filters all HTTP and HTTPS requests with rules defined via simple comparisons or regular expressions. Near infinite scalability with no capacity constraints.

  • Managed WAF Service

    Optional add-on where Myra security experts create tailored rule sets for your specific applications, provide ongoing optimization, and offer expert support on demand. Ideal for teams without dedicated WAF expertise.

  • Zero-Day Protection

    Responds to newly discovered vulnerabilities with rapid rule updates. Proactive defense against zero-day exploits before patches are available.

  • Data Sovereignty (Germany)

    On request, all data processing occurs exclusively in Germany. Full GDPR compliance and BSI-qualified infrastructure for organizations with strict European data sovereignty requirements.

  • NIS-2 and DORA Compliance

    Designed for compliance with the EU Network and Information Systems Directive (NIS-2) and Digital Operational Resilience Act (DORA). Critical for financial institutions and essential service operators in the EU.

  • API Protection

    Protects APIs against injection attacks, exploits, and data leaks. Detects faulty authentication and missing protection measures that could lead to service interruptions.

  • Intuitive Rule Management

    Web-based UI for creating, editing, and managing WAF rules. Toggle rules on/off with a single click. Rules include parameters like name, log identifier, expiration date, conditions, and actions.

SiteLock TrueShield

  • TrueShield WAF

    Cloud-based WAF providing OWASP Top 10 protection via DNS redirect.

  • Malware Scanning

    Daily website scanning for malware, backdoors, and suspicious files.

  • Hosting Provider Integration

    Available directly through many hosting control panels.

Which One Is Right for You?

The best WAF depends on your specific requirements, infrastructure, and team expertise.

Myra Hyperscale WAF

  • You need: European organizations with strict data sovereignty requirements. Banks, insurance companies, and financial institutions needing NIS-2 and DORA compliance. German public sector and critical infrastructure operators requiring BSI-qualified solutions. Mid-sized enterprises wanting a managed WAF without in-house security expertise.
  • You're using: Any origin (own data center, cloud, hosting provider). Compatible with AWS, Azure, GCP, on-premises, and hybrid deployments via DNS-based integration.
Learn more →

SiteLock TrueShield

  • You need: Small businesses on shared hosting, non-technical website owners
  • You're using: Any web application (DNS-based), cPanel, WordPress, Joomla
Learn more →

We recommend evaluating both options with a trial or free tier before committing. Consider your existing infrastructure, team expertise, compliance requirements, and budget.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which has better support: Myra Hyperscale WAF or SiteLock TrueShield?

Myra Hyperscale WAF has a higher support rating (4.5/5) compared to SiteLock TrueShield (3.0/5). However, support quality can vary based on your plan tier - enterprise customers typically receive more responsive support from both providers. Consider evaluating support during a trial period.

Which is easier to implement: Myra Hyperscale WAF or SiteLock TrueShield?

SiteLock TrueShield scores higher for ease of use (4.2/5) versus Myra Hyperscale WAF (4.0/5). The actual implementation effort depends on your existing infrastructure and team expertise.

Which is more cost-effective: Myra Hyperscale WAF or SiteLock TrueShield?

Neither provider offers a completely free tier. Myra Hyperscale WAF scores higher for value (3.2/5). Total cost depends on your traffic volume, required features, and support level needs.

Which works better with AWS: Myra Hyperscale WAF or SiteLock TrueShield?

Myra Hyperscale WAF explicitly supports AWS while SiteLock TrueShield's AWS integration may vary. Consider whether native AWS integration or cross-cloud portability matters more for your use case.

Which is better for WordPress: Myra Hyperscale WAF or SiteLock TrueShield?

SiteLock TrueShield explicitly supports WordPress while Myra Hyperscale WAF takes a more platform-agnostic approach. For WordPress-specific threats like plugin vulnerabilities and brute force attacks, look for providers with WordPress-specific rule sets.