LiteSpeed Web Server WAF vs Reblaze (Link11) Web Security

Both LiteSpeed Web Server WAF and Reblaze (Link11) Web Security are capable WAF solutions. The right choice depends on your specific infrastructure, budget, and feature requirements.

View LiteSpeed Web Server WAF Review View Reblaze (Link11) Web Security Review

Overview

LiteSpeed Web Server WAF and Reblaze (Link11) Web Security are both popular web application firewall solutions. This comparison will help you understand the key differences and choose the right one for your needs.

Built-in WAF module for LiteSpeed Web Server providing ModSecurity-compatible protection with high performance and low resource usage.

Cloud-native WAAP platform offering fully managed WAF, bot management, and DDoS protection with private cloud deployment options for enhanced data privacy.

Quick Comparison

Feature LiteSpeed Web Server WAF Reblaze (Link11) Web Security
Overall Rating 3.8/5 4.1/5
Free Tier Yes No
Pricing Model Per-server license Custom enterprise pricing
Ease of Use 4.0/5 4.0/5
Value for Money 4.5/5 3.6/5
Support 3.5/5 4.4/5
Platforms Linux servers Any web application, AWS, Azure, GCP, private cloud
Compliance PCI DSS (with proper configuration) SOC 2, ISO 27001, GDPR, PCI DSS

Pricing Comparison

LiteSpeed Web Server WAF

Model: Per-server license

Free Tier Available

OpenLiteSpeed

Free

LiteSpeed Enterprise

From $0 (1-worker) to $92/month

View full pricing →

Reblaze (Link11) Web Security

Model: Custom enterprise pricing

Standard

Custom pricing

Enterprise

Custom pricing

View full pricing →

Features Comparison

LiteSpeed Web Server WAF

  • ModSecurity Compatibility

    Supports ModSecurity rules with significantly better performance than Apache mod_security.

  • Built-In WAF

    WAF integrated directly into the web server for minimal overhead.

  • OWASP CRS Support

    Compatible with the OWASP Core Rule Set; CRS must be enabled and the rule set installed, it is not active by default.

Reblaze (Link11) Web Security

  • Private Cloud Deployment

    Dedicated virtual private cloud per customer eliminates multi-tenant security concerns and enhances data privacy.

  • Machine Learning Detection

    ML-powered traffic analysis automatically identifies and blocks malicious requests while allowing legitimate traffic.

  • Bot Management

    Advanced bot detection distinguishing between legitimate users, good bots (search engines), and malicious automation.

  • DDoS Protection

    Integrated Link11 DDoS mitigation with global scrubbing network for volumetric and application-layer attacks.

  • API Security

    Protection for REST and GraphQL APIs with schema validation and anomaly detection.

  • Managed SOC

    24/7 Security Operations Center monitoring with expert incident response and threat hunting.

Which One Is Right for You?

The best WAF depends on your specific requirements, infrastructure, and team expertise.

LiteSpeed Web Server WAF

  • You need: Hosting providers, WordPress sites on LiteSpeed, organizations wanting server-level WAF
  • You want to start with a free tier
  • You're using: Linux servers
Learn more →

Reblaze (Link11) Web Security

  • You need: European enterprises requiring data sovereignty, organizations wanting managed security services, privacy-conscious deployments
  • You're using: Any web application, AWS, Azure, GCP, private cloud
Learn more →

We recommend evaluating both options with a trial or free tier before committing. Consider your existing infrastructure, team expertise, compliance requirements, and budget.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better for startups: LiteSpeed Web Server WAF or Reblaze (Link11) Web Security?

LiteSpeed Web Server WAF offers a free tier while Reblaze (Link11) Web Security does not, which may be important for early-stage startups. Consider your immediate security needs and growth plans when choosing.

Which has better support: LiteSpeed Web Server WAF or Reblaze (Link11) Web Security?

Reblaze (Link11) Web Security has a higher support rating (4.4/5) compared to LiteSpeed Web Server WAF (3.5/5). However, support quality can vary based on your plan tier - enterprise customers typically receive more responsive support from both providers. Consider evaluating support during a trial period.

Which is easier to implement: LiteSpeed Web Server WAF or Reblaze (Link11) Web Security?

Reblaze (Link11) Web Security scores higher for ease of use (4.0/5) versus LiteSpeed Web Server WAF (4.0/5). The actual implementation effort depends on your existing infrastructure and team expertise.

Which is more cost-effective: LiteSpeed Web Server WAF or Reblaze (Link11) Web Security?

LiteSpeed Web Server WAF offers a free tier while Reblaze (Link11) Web Security requires a paid plan. LiteSpeed Web Server WAF scores higher for value (4.5/5). Total cost depends on your traffic volume, required features, and support level needs.

Which works better with AWS: LiteSpeed Web Server WAF or Reblaze (Link11) Web Security?

Reblaze (Link11) Web Security explicitly supports AWS while LiteSpeed Web Server WAF's AWS integration may vary. Consider whether native AWS integration or cross-cloud portability matters more for your use case.