SiteLock TrueShield vs UBIKA WAAP
SiteLock TrueShield and UBIKA WAAP serve different market segments. Your organization's size, budget, and security requirements will determine which is the better fit.
Note: SiteLock TrueShield and UBIKA WAAP target different market segments. This comparison highlights the trade-offs between solutions designed for different organizational sizes.
Overview
SiteLock TrueShield and UBIKA WAAP are both popular web application firewall solutions. This comparison will help you understand the key differences and choose the right one for your needs.
Cloud-based WAF designed for small businesses and shared hosting, offering simple setup and affordable web application protection.
European sovereign WAF offering comprehensive application and API protection with EU data residency guarantees and flexible SaaS or cloud deployment options.
Quick Comparison
| Feature | SiteLock TrueShield | UBIKA WAAP |
|---|---|---|
| Overall Rating | 3.0/5 | 4.0/5 |
| Free Tier | No | No |
| Pricing Model | Monthly subscription | Subscription / Pay-as-you-go |
| Ease of Use | 4.2/5 | 3.7/5 |
| Value for Money | 3.0/5 | 4.0/5 |
| Support | 3.0/5 | 4.1/5 |
| Platforms | Any web application (DNS-based), cPanel, WordPress, Joomla | Any web application, AWS, Azure, on-premises, hybrid cloud |
| Compliance | PCI DSS scanning | ISO 27001, HDS (Health Data Hosting), SecNumCloud, GDPR, PCI DSS |
Pricing Comparison
SiteLock TrueShield
Model: Monthly subscription
Basic
From $19.99/month
Pro
From $29.99/month
Business
From $44.99/month
UBIKA WAAP
Model: Subscription / Pay-as-you-go
Cloud Protector SaaS
Subscription-based
WAAP Cloud
Pay-as-you-go / BYOL
Enterprise
Custom pricing
Features Comparison
SiteLock TrueShield
-
TrueShield WAF
Cloud-based WAF providing OWASP Top 10 protection via DNS redirect.
-
Malware Scanning
Daily website scanning for malware, backdoors, and suspicious files.
-
Hosting Provider Integration
Available directly through many hosting control panels.
UBIKA WAAP
-
EU Data Sovereignty
Hosted in OVHcloud European data centers, not subject to US Cloud Act or other extraterritorial laws.
-
Workflow Technology
Unique visual workflow design for security policies allows tailoring protection to specific application requirements.
-
API Protection
Advanced API security with JWT/OAuth support, JSON/XML filtering, and OpenAPI schema validation.
-
DDoS Protection
Network and application-layer DDoS mitigation with global caching and acceleration.
-
DevOps Integration
Infrastructure-as-Code support with REST API and gRPC (Appsecctl) for CI/CD pipeline integration.
-
Managed Security Services
Optional MSS with proactive monitoring, false positive management, and monthly security reporting.
Which One Is Right for You?
The best WAF depends on your specific requirements, infrastructure, and team expertise.
SiteLock TrueShield
- You need: Small businesses on shared hosting, non-technical website owners
- You're using: Any web application (DNS-based), cPanel, WordPress, Joomla
UBIKA WAAP
- You need: European enterprises, regulated industries (healthcare, finance), organizations requiring EU data residency, French public sector
- You're using: Any web application, AWS, Azure, on-premises, hybrid cloud
We recommend evaluating both options with a trial or free tier before committing. Consider your existing infrastructure, team expertise, compliance requirements, and budget.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which has better support: SiteLock TrueShield or UBIKA WAAP?
UBIKA WAAP has a higher support rating (4.1/5) compared to SiteLock TrueShield (3.0/5). However, support quality can vary based on your plan tier - enterprise customers typically receive more responsive support from both providers. Consider evaluating support during a trial period.
Which is easier to implement: SiteLock TrueShield or UBIKA WAAP?
SiteLock TrueShield scores higher for ease of use (4.2/5) versus UBIKA WAAP (3.7/5). The actual implementation effort depends on your existing infrastructure and team expertise.
Which is more cost-effective: SiteLock TrueShield or UBIKA WAAP?
Neither provider offers a completely free tier. UBIKA WAAP scores higher for value (4.0/5). Total cost depends on your traffic volume, required features, and support level needs.
Which works better with AWS: SiteLock TrueShield or UBIKA WAAP?
UBIKA WAAP explicitly supports AWS while SiteLock TrueShield's AWS integration may vary. Consider whether native AWS integration or cross-cloud portability matters more for your use case.
Which is better for WordPress: SiteLock TrueShield or UBIKA WAAP?
SiteLock TrueShield explicitly supports WordPress while UBIKA WAAP takes a more platform-agnostic approach. For WordPress-specific threats like plugin vulnerabilities and brute force attacks, look for providers with WordPress-specific rule sets.