Azure Web Application Firewall vs SiteLock TrueShield
Azure Web Application Firewall and SiteLock TrueShield serve different market segments. Your organization's size, budget, and security requirements will determine which is the better fit.
Note: Azure Web Application Firewall and SiteLock TrueShield target different market segments. This comparison highlights the trade-offs between solutions designed for different organizational sizes.
Overview
Azure Web Application Firewall and SiteLock TrueShield are both popular web application firewall solutions. This comparison will help you understand the key differences and choose the right one for your needs.
Microsoft's cloud-native WAF integrated with Azure Application Gateway and Front Door, offering enterprise-grade protection with deep Azure ecosystem integration.
Cloud-based WAF designed for small businesses and shared hosting, offering simple setup and affordable web application protection.
Quick Comparison
| Feature | Azure Web Application Firewall | SiteLock TrueShield |
|---|---|---|
| Overall Rating | 4.2/5 | 3.0/5 |
| Free Tier | No | No |
| Pricing Model | Pay-per-use (gateway hours + data processed) | Monthly subscription |
| Ease of Use | 3.5/5 | 4.2/5 |
| Value for Money | 3.8/5 | 3.0/5 |
| Support | 4.2/5 | 3.0/5 |
| Platforms | Azure Application Gateway, Azure Front Door, Azure CDN, Azure Spring Apps | Any web application (DNS-based), cPanel, WordPress, Joomla |
| Compliance | SOC 1/2/3, PCI DSS, HIPAA, FedRAMP High, ISO 27001, ISO 27018 | PCI DSS scanning |
Pricing Comparison
Azure Web Application Firewall
Model: Pay-per-use (gateway hours + data processed)
Application Gateway WAF v2
~$0.443/hour + $0.008/GB
Front Door Standard
$35/month base + usage
Front Door Premium
$330/month base + usage
SiteLock TrueShield
Model: Monthly subscription
Basic
From $19.99/month
Pro
From $29.99/month
Business
From $44.99/month
Features Comparison
Azure Web Application Firewall
-
OWASP Core Rule Set
Pre-configured protection against OWASP Top 10 vulnerabilities with regularly updated rule sets.
-
Custom Rules
Create custom rules based on geo-location, IP address, request attributes, and rate limiting.
-
Bot Protection
Managed bot protection ruleset to detect and mitigate malicious bot traffic (Premium tier).
-
Per-Site Policies
Apply different WAF policies to different sites behind the same gateway.
-
Exclusion Lists
Fine-tune rules by excluding specific request attributes to reduce false positives.
-
Geo-Filtering
Allow or block traffic based on country/region of origin.
SiteLock TrueShield
-
TrueShield WAF
Cloud-based WAF providing OWASP Top 10 protection via DNS redirect.
-
Malware Scanning
Daily website scanning for malware, backdoors, and suspicious files.
-
Hosting Provider Integration
Available directly through many hosting control panels.
Which One Is Right for You?
The best WAF depends on your specific requirements, infrastructure, and team expertise.
Azure Web Application Firewall
- You need: Azure-native applications, Microsoft enterprise customers, government and regulated industries, global applications needing edge protection
- You're using: Azure Application Gateway, Azure Front Door, Azure CDN, Azure Spring Apps
SiteLock TrueShield
- You need: Small businesses on shared hosting, non-technical website owners
- You're using: Any web application (DNS-based), cPanel, WordPress, Joomla
We recommend evaluating both options with a trial or free tier before committing. Consider your existing infrastructure, team expertise, compliance requirements, and budget.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which has better support: Azure Web Application Firewall or SiteLock TrueShield?
Azure Web Application Firewall has a higher support rating (4.2/5) compared to SiteLock TrueShield (3.0/5). However, support quality can vary based on your plan tier - enterprise customers typically receive more responsive support from both providers. Consider evaluating support during a trial period.
Which is easier to implement: Azure Web Application Firewall or SiteLock TrueShield?
SiteLock TrueShield scores higher for ease of use (4.2/5) versus Azure Web Application Firewall (3.5/5). The actual implementation effort depends on your existing infrastructure and team expertise.
Which is more cost-effective: Azure Web Application Firewall or SiteLock TrueShield?
Neither provider offers a completely free tier. Azure Web Application Firewall scores higher for value (3.8/5). Total cost depends on your traffic volume, required features, and support level needs.
Which is better for WordPress: Azure Web Application Firewall or SiteLock TrueShield?
SiteLock TrueShield explicitly supports WordPress while Azure Web Application Firewall takes a more platform-agnostic approach. For WordPress-specific threats like plugin vulnerabilities and brute force attacks, look for providers with WordPress-specific rule sets.
Which is better for enterprise: Azure Web Application Firewall or SiteLock TrueShield?
Azure Web Application Firewall is positioned for enterprise use cases, while SiteLock TrueShield may be more suited for small to mid-market organizations. Enterprise buyers should evaluate SLAs, support options, and integration capabilities.