AWS Web Application Firewall vs Cloudbric Web Application Firewall

Both AWS Web Application Firewall and Cloudbric Web Application Firewall are capable WAF solutions. The right choice depends on your specific infrastructure, budget, and feature requirements.

View AWS Web Application Firewall Review View Cloudbric Web Application Firewall Review

Overview

AWS Web Application Firewall and Cloudbric Web Application Firewall are both popular web application firewall solutions. This comparison will help you understand the key differences and choose the right one for your needs.

Native AWS WAF with pay-per-use pricing starting at $5/mo per Web ACL, $1/rule, and $0.60 per million requests. Protects CloudFront, ALB, and API Gateway workloads.

AI-powered cloud WAF from South Korea offering OWASP protection, DDoS mitigation, and SSL management with a focus on the APAC market.

Quick Comparison

Feature AWS Web Application Firewall Cloudbric Web Application Firewall
Overall Rating 4.3/5 3.5/5
Free Tier No Yes
Pricing Model Pay-per-use (rules + requests) Free tier; paid plans quoted by traffic volume
Ease of Use 3.5/5 4.0/5
Value for Money 4.0/5 3.8/5
Support 4.0/5 3.3/5
Platforms AWS CloudFront, ALB, API Gateway, AppSync, Cognito, App Runner, Verified Access Any web application (DNS-based)
Compliance SOC 1/2/3, PCI DSS, HIPAA, FedRAMP, ISO 27001 ISO 27001, ISO 27017, CSA STAR

Pricing Comparison

AWS Web Application Firewall

Model: Pay-per-use (rules + requests)

Small (1 ACL, 10 rules)

$15/month + $0.60/M requests

Medium (2 ACL, 25 rules)

$35/month + $0.60/M requests

Large (5 ACL, 50 rules)

$75/month + $0.60/M requests

View full pricing →

Cloudbric Web Application Firewall

Model: Free tier; paid plans quoted by traffic volume

Free Tier Available

Free

Free

Paid

Custom pricing

View full pricing →

Features Comparison

AWS Web Application Firewall

  • AWS Managed Rules

    Pre-configured rule groups maintained by AWS and AWS Marketplace sellers for common threats.

  • Custom Rules

    Build your own rules using conditions like IP addresses, HTTP headers, URI strings, and more.

  • Rate-Based Rules

    Automatically block IPs that exceed defined request thresholds.

  • Bot Control

    Managed rule group for detecting and managing bot traffic (additional cost).

  • Fraud Control

    Account takeover prevention and creation fraud detection for login/signup pages.

  • Firewall Manager Integration

    Centrally configure and manage WAF rules across multiple AWS accounts.

Cloudbric Web Application Firewall

  • Deep Learning Detection

    AI-powered threat detection using deep learning instead of pure signature matching.

  • DDoS Protection

    Layer 3/4/7 DDoS mitigation included with WAF service.

  • Free SSL Management

    Automatic SSL certificate provisioning and management.

Which One Is Right for You?

The best WAF depends on your specific requirements, infrastructure, and team expertise.

AWS Web Application Firewall

  • You need: AWS-native applications, organizations already invested in AWS ecosystem, variable traffic workloads, multi-account AWS environments
  • You're using: AWS CloudFront, ALB, API Gateway, AppSync, Cognito, App Runner, Verified Access
Learn more →

Cloudbric Web Application Firewall

  • You need: APAC-focused businesses, small to mid-size websites, budget-conscious organizations
  • You want to start with a free tier
  • You're using: Any web application (DNS-based)
Learn more →

We recommend evaluating both options with a trial or free tier before committing. Consider your existing infrastructure, team expertise, compliance requirements, and budget.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better for startups: AWS Web Application Firewall or Cloudbric Web Application Firewall?

Cloudbric Web Application Firewall offers a free tier while AWS Web Application Firewall does not, making Cloudbric Web Application Firewall more accessible for budget-conscious startups. Cloudbric Web Application Firewall scores higher for ease of use (4.0/5), which is valuable for smaller teams. Consider your immediate security needs and growth plans when choosing.

Which has better support: AWS Web Application Firewall or Cloudbric Web Application Firewall?

AWS Web Application Firewall has a higher support rating (4.0/5) compared to Cloudbric Web Application Firewall (3.3/5). However, support quality can vary based on your plan tier - enterprise customers typically receive more responsive support from both providers. Consider evaluating support during a trial period.

Which is easier to implement: AWS Web Application Firewall or Cloudbric Web Application Firewall?

Cloudbric Web Application Firewall scores higher for ease of use (4.0/5) versus AWS Web Application Firewall (3.5/5). The actual implementation effort depends on your existing infrastructure and team expertise.

Which is more cost-effective: AWS Web Application Firewall or Cloudbric Web Application Firewall?

Cloudbric Web Application Firewall offers a free tier while AWS Web Application Firewall requires a paid plan. AWS Web Application Firewall scores higher for value (4.0/5). Total cost depends on your traffic volume, required features, and support level needs.

Which works better with AWS: AWS Web Application Firewall or Cloudbric Web Application Firewall?

AWS Web Application Firewall is AWS's native WAF solution, offering the tightest integration with AWS services like CloudFront, ALB, and API Gateway. Cloudbric Web Application Firewall can also protect AWS workloads but requires additional configuration. Consider whether native AWS integration or cross-cloud portability matters more for your use case.