HUMAN Security vs StackPath Web Application Firewall

Both HUMAN Security and StackPath Web Application Firewall are capable WAF solutions. The right choice depends on your specific infrastructure, budget, and feature requirements.

Overview

HUMAN Security and StackPath Web Application Firewall are both popular web application firewall solutions. This comparison will help you understand the key differences and choose the right one for your needs.

Advanced bot management and fraud prevention platform combining technologies from HUMAN (formerly White Ops) and PerimeterX.

Edge-based WAF that was part of StackPath's CDN and edge computing platform. Discontinued in June 2024 when the company shut down operations.

Quick Comparison

Feature HUMAN Security StackPath Web Application Firewall
Overall Rating 4.2/5 1.0/5
Free Tier No No
Pricing Model Custom enterprise pricing Per site / Per bandwidth tier (discontinued)
Ease of Use 3.5/5 1.0/5
Value for Money 3.3/5 1.0/5
Support 4.0/5 1.0/5
Platforms Any web application, mobile apps, APIs Cloud (SaaS, discontinued)
Compliance SOC 2, ISO 27001, TAG Certified Against Fraud SOC 2, PCI DSS (historical)

Pricing Comparison

HUMAN Security

Model: Custom enterprise pricing

Enterprise

Custom pricing

View full pricing →

StackPath Web Application Firewall

Model: Per site / Per bandwidth tier (discontinued)

Edge Delivery 200

$27.50/month

Edge Delivery 2000

$275/month

View full pricing →

Features Comparison

HUMAN Security

  • Behavioral Analysis

    Advanced behavioral detection using client-side signals and server-side analysis.

  • Human Verification

    Proprietary technology to verify whether interactions are from humans or bots.

  • Account Protection

    Prevent account takeover, credential stuffing, and fake account creation.

StackPath Web Application Firewall

  • Edge WAF

    Application-layer firewall deployed at the edge, filtering traffic before it reached origin servers. Included OWASP Top 10 coverage and custom rule support.

  • DDoS Protection

    Volumetric and application-layer DDoS mitigation integrated with the CDN edge network.

  • Bot Management

    Bot detection and mitigation using behavioral analysis and challenge-based verification.

  • Real-time Analytics

    Dashboard showing traffic patterns, blocked requests, and attack trends across protected sites.

Which One Is Right for You?

The best WAF depends on your specific requirements, infrastructure, and team expertise.

HUMAN Security

  • You need: Large enterprises facing sophisticated bot threats, ad-tech companies, e-commerce platforms
  • You're using: Any web application, mobile apps, APIs
Learn more →

StackPath Web Application Firewall

  • You need: Historical reference only. StackPath is no longer available.
  • You're using: Cloud (SaaS, discontinued)
Learn more →

We recommend evaluating both options with a trial or free tier before committing. Consider your existing infrastructure, team expertise, compliance requirements, and budget.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which has better support: HUMAN Security or StackPath Web Application Firewall?

HUMAN Security has a higher support rating (4.0/5) compared to StackPath Web Application Firewall (1.0/5). However, support quality can vary based on your plan tier - enterprise customers typically receive more responsive support from both providers. Consider evaluating support during a trial period.

Which is easier to implement: HUMAN Security or StackPath Web Application Firewall?

HUMAN Security scores higher for ease of use (3.5/5) versus StackPath Web Application Firewall (1.0/5). The actual implementation effort depends on your existing infrastructure and team expertise.

Which is more cost-effective: HUMAN Security or StackPath Web Application Firewall?

Neither provider offers a completely free tier. HUMAN Security scores higher for value (3.3/5). Total cost depends on your traffic volume, required features, and support level needs.

Which is better for enterprise: HUMAN Security or StackPath Web Application Firewall?

HUMAN Security is positioned for enterprise use cases, while StackPath Web Application Firewall may be more suited for small to mid-market organizations. Both offer compliance certifications important for enterprise. Enterprise buyers should evaluate SLAs, support options, and integration capabilities.