Fortinet FortiWeb vs SiteLock TrueShield

Fortinet FortiWeb and SiteLock TrueShield serve different market segments. Your organization's size, budget, and security requirements will determine which is the better fit.

Note: Fortinet FortiWeb and SiteLock TrueShield target different market segments. This comparison highlights the trade-offs between solutions designed for different organizational sizes.

Overview

Fortinet FortiWeb and SiteLock TrueShield are both popular web application firewall solutions. This comparison will help you understand the key differences and choose the right one for your needs.

AI-powered web application firewall from Fortinet providing advanced threat detection, API protection, and bot mitigation for web applications and APIs, available as hardware appliance, VM, or cloud service.

Cloud-based WAF designed for small businesses and shared hosting, offering simple setup and affordable web application protection.

Quick Comparison

Feature Fortinet FortiWeb SiteLock TrueShield
Overall Rating 4.2/5 3.0/5
Free Tier No No
Pricing Model Appliance purchase + subscription, or SaaS subscription Monthly subscription
Ease of Use 3.5/5 4.2/5
Value for Money 3.8/5 3.0/5
Support 4.3/5 3.0/5
Platforms On-premises, AWS, Azure, GCP, Oracle Cloud, Kubernetes, VMware, Hyper-V, KVM Any web application (DNS-based), cPanel, WordPress, Joomla
Compliance PCI DSS, HIPAA, SOC 2, GDPR, FIPS 140-2 PCI DSS scanning

Pricing Comparison

Fortinet FortiWeb

Model: Appliance purchase + subscription, or SaaS subscription

FortiWeb Appliance

Starting ~$20,000

FortiWeb VM

Custom pricing

FortiWeb Cloud

Custom pricing (SaaS)

View full pricing →

SiteLock TrueShield

Model: Monthly subscription

Basic

From $19.99/month

Pro

From $29.99/month

Business

From $44.99/month

View full pricing →

Features Comparison

Fortinet FortiWeb

  • ML-Based Threat Detection

    Dual-layer machine learning engine that profiles application behavior and detects anomalies without manual rule tuning.

  • API Protection

    Automatic API discovery, schema validation, and protection against OWASP API Top 10 threats including parameter tampering and injection attacks.

  • Bot Mitigation

    Advanced bot detection using ML, browser fingerprinting, and behavioral analysis to distinguish legitimate users from malicious bots.

  • Virtual Patching

    Automatic virtual patches from FortiGuard Labs to protect against newly discovered vulnerabilities before application code can be updated.

  • DDoS Protection

    Layer 7 DDoS protection with rate limiting, IP reputation, and geographic blocking to prevent application-layer denial of service attacks.

  • Security Fabric Integration

    Deep integration with Fortinet Security Fabric for correlated threat intelligence, automated response, and unified security management.

SiteLock TrueShield

  • TrueShield WAF

    Cloud-based WAF providing OWASP Top 10 protection via DNS redirect.

  • Malware Scanning

    Daily website scanning for malware, backdoors, and suspicious files.

  • Hosting Provider Integration

    Available directly through many hosting control panels.

Which One Is Right for You?

The best WAF depends on your specific requirements, infrastructure, and team expertise.

Fortinet FortiWeb

  • You need: Mid-to-large enterprises, organizations using Fortinet Security Fabric, hybrid cloud deployments, regulated industries needing compliance certifications
  • You're using: On-premises, AWS, Azure, GCP, Oracle Cloud, Kubernetes, VMware, Hyper-V, KVM
Learn more →

SiteLock TrueShield

  • You need: Small businesses on shared hosting, non-technical website owners
  • You're using: Any web application (DNS-based), cPanel, WordPress, Joomla
Learn more →

We recommend evaluating both options with a trial or free tier before committing. Consider your existing infrastructure, team expertise, compliance requirements, and budget.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which has better support: Fortinet FortiWeb or SiteLock TrueShield?

Fortinet FortiWeb has a higher support rating (4.3/5) compared to SiteLock TrueShield (3.0/5). However, support quality can vary based on your plan tier - enterprise customers typically receive more responsive support from both providers. Consider evaluating support during a trial period.

Which is easier to implement: Fortinet FortiWeb or SiteLock TrueShield?

SiteLock TrueShield scores higher for ease of use (4.2/5) versus Fortinet FortiWeb (3.5/5). The actual implementation effort depends on your existing infrastructure and team expertise.

Which is more cost-effective: Fortinet FortiWeb or SiteLock TrueShield?

Neither provider offers a completely free tier. Fortinet FortiWeb scores higher for value (3.8/5). Total cost depends on your traffic volume, required features, and support level needs.

Which works better with AWS: Fortinet FortiWeb or SiteLock TrueShield?

Fortinet FortiWeb explicitly supports AWS while SiteLock TrueShield's AWS integration may vary. Consider whether native AWS integration or cross-cloud portability matters more for your use case.

Which is better for WordPress: Fortinet FortiWeb or SiteLock TrueShield?

SiteLock TrueShield explicitly supports WordPress while Fortinet FortiWeb takes a more platform-agnostic approach. For WordPress-specific threats like plugin vulnerabilities and brute force attacks, look for providers with WordPress-specific rule sets.