Fastly Next-Gen WAF (Signal Sciences) vs SiteLock TrueShield

Both Fastly Next-Gen WAF (Signal Sciences) and SiteLock TrueShield are capable WAF solutions. The right choice depends on your specific infrastructure, budget, and feature requirements.

View Fastly Next-Gen WAF (Signal Sciences) Review View SiteLock TrueShield Review

Overview

Fastly Next-Gen WAF (Signal Sciences) and SiteLock TrueShield are both popular web application firewall solutions. This comparison will help you understand the key differences and choose the right one for your needs.

Developer-friendly WAF using proprietary SmartParse technology, offering low false positives and seamless DevOps integration for modern application security.

Cloud-based WAF designed for small businesses and shared hosting, offering simple setup and affordable web application protection.

Quick Comparison

Feature Fastly Next-Gen WAF (Signal Sciences) SiteLock TrueShield
Overall Rating 4.5/5 3.0/5
Free Tier No No
Pricing Model Custom pricing based on requests and features Monthly subscription
Ease of Use 4.0/5 4.2/5
Value for Money 3.8/5 3.0/5
Support 4.5/5 3.0/5
Platforms Any web application, AWS, GCP, Azure, Kubernetes, Docker, Serverless, Nginx, Apache Any web application (DNS-based), cPanel, WordPress, Joomla
Compliance SOC 2 Type II, PCI DSS, ISO 27001, HIPAA, GDPR PCI DSS scanning

Pricing Comparison

Fastly Next-Gen WAF (Signal Sciences)

Model: Custom pricing based on requests and features

Essential

Custom pricing

Professional

Custom pricing

Premier

Custom pricing

View full pricing →

SiteLock TrueShield

Model: Monthly subscription

Basic

From $19.99/month

Pro

From $29.99/month

Business

From $44.99/month

View full pricing →

Features Comparison

Fastly Next-Gen WAF (Signal Sciences)

  • SmartParse Technology

    Intelligent parsing technology that understands application context to reduce false positives by 90%+.

  • Power Rules

    Flexible rule language for creating custom detection and response logic based on any request attribute.

  • API Discovery

    Automatic discovery and cataloging of API endpoints with security assessment.

  • DevOps Integration

    Native integrations with CI/CD tools, infrastructure as code support, and developer-friendly APIs.

  • Multi-Environment Deployment

    Deploy as cloud service, agent, or edge module across diverse infrastructure.

  • Real-Time Dashboards

    Live visibility into attacks, decisions, and application health without sampling.

SiteLock TrueShield

  • TrueShield WAF

    Cloud-based WAF providing OWASP Top 10 protection via DNS redirect.

  • Malware Scanning

    Daily website scanning for malware, backdoors, and suspicious files.

  • Hosting Provider Integration

    Available directly through many hosting control panels.

Which One Is Right for You?

The best WAF depends on your specific requirements, infrastructure, and team expertise.

Fastly Next-Gen WAF (Signal Sciences)

  • You need: Modern DevOps teams, API-heavy applications, organizations frustrated with false positives, companies needing flexible deployment options
  • You're using: Any web application, AWS, GCP, Azure, Kubernetes, Docker, Serverless, Nginx, Apache
Learn more →

SiteLock TrueShield

  • You need: Small businesses on shared hosting, non-technical website owners
  • You're using: Any web application (DNS-based), cPanel, WordPress, Joomla
Learn more →

We recommend evaluating both options with a trial or free tier before committing. Consider your existing infrastructure, team expertise, compliance requirements, and budget.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which has better support: Fastly Next-Gen WAF (Signal Sciences) or SiteLock TrueShield?

Fastly Next-Gen WAF (Signal Sciences) has a higher support rating (4.5/5) compared to SiteLock TrueShield (3.0/5). However, support quality can vary based on your plan tier - enterprise customers typically receive more responsive support from both providers. Consider evaluating support during a trial period.

Which is easier to implement: Fastly Next-Gen WAF (Signal Sciences) or SiteLock TrueShield?

SiteLock TrueShield scores higher for ease of use (4.2/5) versus Fastly Next-Gen WAF (Signal Sciences) (4.0/5). The actual implementation effort depends on your existing infrastructure and team expertise.

Which is more cost-effective: Fastly Next-Gen WAF (Signal Sciences) or SiteLock TrueShield?

Neither provider offers a completely free tier. Fastly Next-Gen WAF (Signal Sciences) scores higher for value (3.8/5). Total cost depends on your traffic volume, required features, and support level needs.

Which works better with AWS: Fastly Next-Gen WAF (Signal Sciences) or SiteLock TrueShield?

Fastly Next-Gen WAF (Signal Sciences) explicitly supports AWS while SiteLock TrueShield's AWS integration may vary. Consider whether native AWS integration or cross-cloud portability matters more for your use case.

Which is better for WordPress: Fastly Next-Gen WAF (Signal Sciences) or SiteLock TrueShield?

SiteLock TrueShield explicitly supports WordPress while Fastly Next-Gen WAF (Signal Sciences) takes a more platform-agnostic approach. For WordPress-specific threats like plugin vulnerabilities and brute force attacks, look for providers with WordPress-specific rule sets.