AWS Web Application Firewall vs ThreatX by A10 Networks
Both AWS Web Application Firewall and ThreatX by A10 Networks are capable WAF solutions. The right choice depends on your specific infrastructure, budget, and feature requirements.
Übersicht
AWS Web Application Firewall and ThreatX by A10 Networks are both popular web application firewall solutions. This comparison will help you understand the key differences and choose the right one for your needs.
Native AWS security service providing scalable WAF protection for applications hosted on AWS infrastructure with pay-per-use pricing.
Verwaltete WAAP-Lösung aus Next-Gen-WAF, API-Schutz, Bot-Abwehr und Layer-7-DDoS-Mitigation, mit verhaltensbasiertem Risiko-Scoring und einem 24/7-SOC im Abonnement.
Schnellvergleich
| Funktion | AWS Web Application Firewall | ThreatX by A10 Networks |
|---|---|---|
| Overall Rating | 4.3/5 | 4.2/5 |
| Free Tier | No | No |
| Pricing Model | Pay-per-use (rules + requests) | Abonnement gestaffelt nach monatlichem HTTP/HTTPS-Anfragevolumen, verwaltetes SOC inklusive |
| Ease of Use | 3.5/5 | 4.4/5 |
| Value for Money | 4.0/5 | 3.9/5 |
| Support | 4.0/5 | 4.6/5 |
| Platforms | AWS CloudFront, ALB, API Gateway, AppSync, Cognito, App Runner, Verified Access | AWS, Azure, GCP, Docker, on-premises data centers, virtual private cloud, hybrid environments |
| Compliance | SOC 1/2/3, PCI DSS, HIPAA, FedRAMP, ISO 27001 | SOC 2 Type 2 (Security and Availability), supports PCI DSS Requirement 6.6, GDPR |
Preisvergleich
AWS Web Application Firewall
Modell: Pay-per-use (rules + requests)
Small (1 ACL, 10 rules)
$15/month + $0.60/M requests
Medium (2 ACL, 25 rules)
$35/month + $0.60/M requests
Large (5 ACL, 50 rules)
$75/month + $0.60/M requests
ThreatX by A10 Networks
Modell: Abonnement gestaffelt nach monatlichem HTTP/HTTPS-Anfragevolumen, verwaltetes SOC inklusive
ThreatX Protect
Individuelles Angebot
Enterprise
Vertrieb kontaktieren
Funktionsvergleich
AWS Web Application Firewall
-
AWS Managed Rules
Pre-configured rule groups maintained by AWS and AWS Marketplace sellers for common threats.
-
Custom Rules
Build your own rules using conditions like IP addresses, HTTP headers, URI strings, and more.
-
Rate-Based Rules
Automatically block IPs that exceed defined request thresholds.
-
Bot Control
Managed rule group for detecting and managing bot traffic (additional cost).
-
Fraud Control
Account takeover prevention and creation fraud detection for login/signup pages.
-
Firewall Manager Integration
Centrally configure and manage WAF rules across multiple AWS accounts.
ThreatX by A10 Networks
-
Hacker-Mind-Risiko-Engine
Adaptives Risiko-Scoring, das Entitäten über Sitzungen und Angriffsvektoren hinweg verfolgt und Sondierungsverhalten über die Zeit korreliert, statt jede Anfrage einzeln zu bewerten.
-
Verwaltetes SOC
Analysten rund um die Uhr, im Abonnement enthalten, die Richtlinien tunen, Bedrohungen jagen, virtuelle Patches setzen und Alarme von Hand prüfen, bevor sie Ihr Team erreichen.
-
API-Schutz
Automatische API-Katalogisierung mit Verhaltensanalyse und Fingerprinting, um Missbrauch, Enumeration und Angriffe auf die Geschäftslogik im Nord-Süd-API-Verkehr zu erkennen.
-
Bot-Management
Blockiert Credential Stuffing, Scraping und Scalping, indem es den Angreifer profiliert statt gegen eine statische Liste von Bot-Signaturen abzugleichen.
-
Layer-7-DDoS-Abwehr
Verfolgung auf Entitäts- und Transaktionsebene, die multivektorielle Fluten auf Anwendungsebene abfängt, ohne echte Nutzer pauschal zu drosseln.
-
Schwärzung sensibler Daten
Automatisches Schwärzen von Zugangsdaten, Tokens, Kartennummern und Sozialversicherungsnummern im erfassten Verkehr, bei 90 Tagen Aufbewahrung.
Which One Is Right for You?
The best WAF depends on your specific requirements, infrastructure, and team expertise.
AWS Web Application Firewall
- You need: AWS-native applications, organizations already invested in AWS ecosystem, variable traffic workloads, multi-account AWS environments
- You're using: AWS CloudFront, ALB, API Gateway, AppSync, Cognito, App Runner, Verified Access
ThreatX by A10 Networks
- You need: Mittelstand und Konzerne ohne eigene AppSec-Funktion, API-lastige Anwendungen, Organisationen, die verwaltete Erkennung wollen statt eines weiteren Dashboards zum Nachjustieren
- You're using: AWS, Azure, GCP, Docker, on-premises data centers, virtual private cloud, hybrid environments
We recommend evaluating both options with a trial or free tier before committing. Consider your existing infrastructure, team expertise, compliance requirements, and budget.
Häufig gestellte Fragen
Which has better support: AWS Web Application Firewall or ThreatX by A10 Networks?
ThreatX by A10 Networks has a higher support rating (4.6/5) compared to AWS Web Application Firewall (4.0/5). However, support quality can vary based on your plan tier - enterprise customers typically receive more responsive support from both providers. Consider evaluating support during a trial period.
Which is easier to implement: AWS Web Application Firewall or ThreatX by A10 Networks?
ThreatX by A10 Networks scores higher for ease of use (4.4/5) versus AWS Web Application Firewall (3.5/5). The actual implementation effort depends on your existing infrastructure and team expertise.
Which is more cost-effective: AWS Web Application Firewall or ThreatX by A10 Networks?
Neither provider offers a completely free tier. AWS Web Application Firewall scores higher for value (4.0/5). Total cost depends on your traffic volume, required features, and support level needs.
Which works better with AWS: AWS Web Application Firewall or ThreatX by A10 Networks?
AWS Web Application Firewall is AWS's native WAF solution, offering the tightest integration with AWS services like CloudFront, ALB, and API Gateway. ThreatX by A10 Networks can also protect AWS workloads but requires additional configuration. Consider whether native AWS integration or cross-cloud portability matters more for your use case.