StackPath Web Application Firewall vs ThreatX by A10 Networks
Both StackPath Web Application Firewall and ThreatX by A10 Networks are capable WAF solutions. The right choice depends on your specific infrastructure, budget, and feature requirements.
Overview
StackPath Web Application Firewall and ThreatX by A10 Networks are both popular web application firewall solutions. This comparison will help you understand the key differences and choose the right one for your needs.
Edge-based WAF that was part of StackPath's CDN and edge computing platform. Discontinued in June 2024 when the company shut down operations.
Managed WAAP that combines a next-gen WAF, API protection, bot defense, and Layer 7 DDoS mitigation with behavioral risk scoring and a 24/7 SOC included in the subscription.
Quick Comparison
| Feature | StackPath Web Application Firewall | ThreatX by A10 Networks |
|---|---|---|
| Overall Rating | 1.0/5 | 4.2/5 |
| Free Tier | No | No |
| Pricing Model | Per site / Per bandwidth tier (discontinued) | Subscription tiered by monthly HTTP/HTTPS request volume, managed SOC included |
| Ease of Use | 1.0/5 | 4.4/5 |
| Value for Money | 1.0/5 | 3.9/5 |
| Support | 1.0/5 | 4.6/5 |
| Platforms | Cloud (SaaS, discontinued) | AWS, Azure, GCP, Docker, on-premises data centers, virtual private cloud, hybrid environments |
| Compliance | SOC 2, PCI DSS (historical) | SOC 2 Type 2 (Security and Availability), supports PCI DSS Requirement 6.6, GDPR |
Pricing Comparison
StackPath Web Application Firewall
Model: Per site / Per bandwidth tier (discontinued)
Edge Delivery 200
$27.50/month
Edge Delivery 2000
$275/month
ThreatX by A10 Networks
Model: Subscription tiered by monthly HTTP/HTTPS request volume, managed SOC included
ThreatX Protect
Custom quote
Enterprise
Contact Sales
Features Comparison
StackPath Web Application Firewall
-
Edge WAF
Application-layer firewall deployed at the edge, filtering traffic before it reached origin servers. Included OWASP Top 10 coverage and custom rule support.
-
DDoS Protection
Volumetric and application-layer DDoS mitigation integrated with the CDN edge network.
-
Bot Management
Bot detection and mitigation using behavioral analysis and challenge-based verification.
-
Real-time Analytics
Dashboard showing traffic patterns, blocked requests, and attack trends across protected sites.
ThreatX by A10 Networks
-
Hacker Mind Risk Engine
Adaptive risk scoring that tracks entities across sessions and attack vectors, correlating probing behavior over time instead of judging requests one at a time.
-
Managed SOC
24/7 analysts included in the subscription who tune policies, hunt threats, apply virtual patches, and hand-validate alerts before they reach your team.
-
API Protection
Automatic API cataloging with behavioral analysis and fingerprinting to catch abuse, enumeration, and business logic attacks against north-south API traffic.
-
Bot Management
Blocks credential stuffing, scraping, and scalping by profiling the attacker rather than matching a static bot signature list.
-
Layer 7 DDoS Defense
Entity and transaction based tracking that absorbs multi-vector application-layer floods without blanket rate limits on real users.
-
Sensitive Data Redaction
Automatic redaction of credentials, tokens, card numbers, and SSN patterns in captured traffic, with a 90-day retention policy.
Which One Is Right for You?
The best WAF depends on your specific requirements, infrastructure, and team expertise.
StackPath Web Application Firewall
- You need: Historical reference only. StackPath is no longer available.
- You're using: Cloud (SaaS, discontinued)
ThreatX by A10 Networks
- You need: Mid-market and enterprise teams without a dedicated appsec function, API-heavy applications, organizations that want managed detection rather than another dashboard to tune
- You're using: AWS, Azure, GCP, Docker, on-premises data centers, virtual private cloud, hybrid environments
We recommend evaluating both options with a trial or free tier before committing. Consider your existing infrastructure, team expertise, compliance requirements, and budget.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which has better support: StackPath Web Application Firewall or ThreatX by A10 Networks?
ThreatX by A10 Networks has a higher support rating (4.6/5) compared to StackPath Web Application Firewall (1.0/5). However, support quality can vary based on your plan tier - enterprise customers typically receive more responsive support from both providers. Consider evaluating support during a trial period.
Which is easier to implement: StackPath Web Application Firewall or ThreatX by A10 Networks?
ThreatX by A10 Networks scores higher for ease of use (4.4/5) versus StackPath Web Application Firewall (1.0/5). The actual implementation effort depends on your existing infrastructure and team expertise.
Which is more cost-effective: StackPath Web Application Firewall or ThreatX by A10 Networks?
Neither provider offers a completely free tier. ThreatX by A10 Networks scores higher for value (3.9/5). Total cost depends on your traffic volume, required features, and support level needs.
Which works better with AWS: StackPath Web Application Firewall or ThreatX by A10 Networks?
ThreatX by A10 Networks explicitly supports AWS while StackPath Web Application Firewall's AWS integration may vary. Consider whether native AWS integration or cross-cloud portability matters more for your use case.
Which is better for enterprise: StackPath Web Application Firewall or ThreatX by A10 Networks?
ThreatX by A10 Networks is positioned for enterprise use cases, while StackPath Web Application Firewall may be more suited for small to mid-market organizations. Both offer compliance certifications important for enterprise. Enterprise buyers should evaluate SLAs, support options, and integration capabilities.