Patchstack vs StackPath Web Application Firewall

Both Patchstack and StackPath Web Application Firewall are capable WAF solutions. The right choice depends on your specific infrastructure, budget, and feature requirements.

Overview

Patchstack and StackPath Web Application Firewall are both popular web application firewall solutions. This comparison will help you understand the key differences and choose the right one for your needs.

WordPress vulnerability intelligence and virtual patching platform. Runs the largest open source vulnerability database and deploys targeted mitigation rules before exploits hit your site.

Edge-based WAF that was part of StackPath's CDN and edge computing platform. Discontinued in June 2024 when the company shut down operations.

Quick Comparison

Feature Patchstack StackPath Web Application Firewall
Overall Rating 4.2/5 1.0/5
Free Tier No No
Pricing Model Subscription (per site, no free tier) Per site / Per bandwidth tier (discontinued)
Ease of Use - 1.0/5
Value for Money - 1.0/5
Support 4.5/5 1.0/5
Platforms WordPress (self-hosted) Cloud (SaaS, discontinued)
Compliance Contact vendor SOC 2, PCI DSS (historical)

Pricing Comparison

Patchstack

Model: Subscription (per site, no free tier)

Developer

$69/year (~$5.75/month)

Enterprise

Custom

Web Host

Custom

View full pricing →

StackPath Web Application Firewall

Model: Per site / Per bandwidth tier (discontinued)

Edge Delivery 200

$27.50/month

Edge Delivery 2000

$275/month

View full pricing →

Features Comparison

Patchstack

See provider page for full feature list.

StackPath Web Application Firewall

  • Edge WAF

    Application-layer firewall deployed at the edge, filtering traffic before it reached origin servers. Included OWASP Top 10 coverage and custom rule support.

  • DDoS Protection

    Volumetric and application-layer DDoS mitigation integrated with the CDN edge network.

  • Bot Management

    Bot detection and mitigation using behavioral analysis and challenge-based verification.

  • Real-time Analytics

    Dashboard showing traffic patterns, blocked requests, and attack trends across protected sites.

Which One Is Right for You?

The best WAF depends on your specific requirements, infrastructure, and team expertise.

Patchstack

  • You're using: WordPress (self-hosted)
Learn more →

StackPath Web Application Firewall

  • You need: Historical reference only. StackPath is no longer available.
  • You're using: Cloud (SaaS, discontinued)
Learn more →

We recommend evaluating both options with a trial or free tier before committing. Consider your existing infrastructure, team expertise, compliance requirements, and budget.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which has better support: Patchstack or StackPath Web Application Firewall?

Patchstack has a higher support rating (4.5/5) compared to StackPath Web Application Firewall (1.0/5). However, support quality can vary based on your plan tier - enterprise customers typically receive more responsive support from both providers. Consider evaluating support during a trial period.

Which is more cost-effective: Patchstack or StackPath Web Application Firewall?

Neither provider offers a completely free tier. Total cost depends on your traffic volume, required features, and support level needs.

Which is better for WordPress: Patchstack or StackPath Web Application Firewall?

Patchstack explicitly supports WordPress while StackPath Web Application Firewall takes a more platform-agnostic approach. For WordPress-specific threats like plugin vulnerabilities and brute force attacks, look for providers with WordPress-specific rule sets.