Myra Hyperscale WAF vs NAXSI
Myra Hyperscale WAF and NAXSI take different approaches to web application security. Consider your team's expertise and infrastructure preferences when evaluating these options.
Myra Hyperscale WAF and NAXSI take fundamentally different approaches to web application security. Understanding your infrastructure and team capabilities will help determine which approach fits your needs.
Overview
Myra Hyperscale WAF and NAXSI are both popular web application firewall solutions. This comparison will help you understand the key differences and choose the right one for your needs.
German-made, GDPR-compliant cloud WAF built for critical infrastructure and regulated industries. BSI-qualified, NIS-2 and DORA compliant. Managed WAF service available. Blocks 8M+ malicious L7 requests per customer per year. Data processing exclusively in Germany on request.
A lightweight, open source WAF module for NGINX that uses a scoring-based approach instead of signature matching, blocking attacks by detecting suspicious patterns rather than maintaining a vulnerability database.
Quick Comparison
| Feature | Myra Hyperscale WAF | NAXSI |
|---|---|---|
| Overall Rating | 3.7/5 | 3.4/5 |
| Free Tier | No | Yes |
| Pricing Model | Custom (quote-based) | Free (Open Source, GPLv3) |
| Ease of Use | 4.0/5 | 2.8/5 |
| Value for Money | 3.2/5 | 4.5/5 |
| Support | 4.5/5 | 2.5/5 |
| Open Source | No | Yes |
| Platforms | Any origin (own data center, cloud, hosting provider). Compatible with AWS, Azure, GCP, on-premises, and hybrid deployments via DNS-based integration. | NGINX, Linux (Debian, Ubuntu, CentOS), FreeBSD, OpenBSD, NetBSD, Docker |
| Compliance | BSI-qualified (C5 Type 2), ISO 27001, PCI DSS, NIS-2 compliant, DORA compliant, GDPR compliant, IT-Grundschutz, SOC 2 Type 2 | N/A (supports OWASP Top 10 protection patterns) |
Pricing Comparison
Myra Hyperscale WAF
Model: Custom (quote-based)
Myra WAF
Custom
Managed WAF Service
Custom (add-on)
Features Comparison
Myra Hyperscale WAF
-
OWASP Top 10 Protection
Blocks SQL injection, XSS, CSRF, and other OWASP Top 10 attacks. Blocks an average of 8 million malicious layer 7 requests per customer per year.
-
HTTP/S Request Filtering
Filters all HTTP and HTTPS requests with rules defined via simple comparisons or regular expressions. Near infinite scalability with no capacity constraints.
-
Managed WAF Service
Optional add-on where Myra security experts create tailored rule sets for your specific applications, provide ongoing optimization, and offer expert support on demand. Ideal for teams without dedicated WAF expertise.
-
Zero-Day Protection
Responds to newly discovered vulnerabilities with rapid rule updates. Proactive defense against zero-day exploits before patches are available.
-
Data Sovereignty (Germany)
On request, all data processing occurs exclusively in Germany. Full GDPR compliance and BSI-qualified infrastructure for organizations with strict European data sovereignty requirements.
-
NIS-2 and DORA Compliance
Designed for compliance with the EU Network and Information Systems Directive (NIS-2) and Digital Operational Resilience Act (DORA). Critical for financial institutions and essential service operators in the EU.
-
API Protection
Protects APIs against injection attacks, exploits, and data leaks. Detects faulty authentication and missing protection measures that could lead to service interruptions.
-
Intuitive Rule Management
Web-based UI for creating, editing, and managing WAF rules. Toggle rules on/off with a single click. Rules include parameters like name, log identifier, expiration date, conditions, and actions.
NAXSI
-
Scoring-Based Detection
Assigns scores to suspicious patterns in requests. Blocks when the cumulative score exceeds a threshold, rather than relying on exact signature matches.
-
Learning Mode
Monitors traffic and automatically generates whitelist rules for legitimate application behavior, reducing manual tuning effort during initial deployment.
-
Virtual Patching
Apply custom rules to block specific vulnerabilities without modifying application code. Rules target raw requests or specific fields like headers, args, and body.
-
Deny-by-Default
Operates like a DROP firewall. Common attack characters and patterns are blocked unless explicitly whitelisted for the target application.
-
Lightweight Footprint
Written in C with only libpcre as a dependency. Adds minimal overhead to NGINX request processing.
-
Dynamic Module Support
Can be compiled as a dynamic NGINX module, allowing it to be loaded without recompiling NGINX from source.
Which One Is Right for You?
The best WAF depends on your specific requirements, infrastructure, and team expertise.
Myra Hyperscale WAF
- You need: European organizations with strict data sovereignty requirements. Banks, insurance companies, and financial institutions needing NIS-2 and DORA compliance. German public sector and critical infrastructure operators requiring BSI-qualified solutions. Mid-sized enterprises wanting a managed WAF without in-house security expertise.
- You're using: Any origin (own data center, cloud, hosting provider). Compatible with AWS, Azure, GCP, on-premises, and hybrid deployments via DNS-based integration.
NAXSI
- You need: Teams already running NGINX who want lightweight inline WAF protection, budget-conscious deployments, applications with predictable request patterns, virtual patching use cases
- You want to start with a free tier
- You prefer open-source solutions
- You're using: NGINX, Linux (Debian, Ubuntu, CentOS), FreeBSD, OpenBSD, NetBSD, Docker
We recommend evaluating both options with a trial or free tier before committing. Consider your existing infrastructure, team expertise, compliance requirements, and budget.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is better for startups: Myra Hyperscale WAF or NAXSI?
NAXSI offers a free tier while Myra Hyperscale WAF does not, making NAXSI more accessible for budget-conscious startups. Myra Hyperscale WAF scores higher for ease of use (4.0/5), which is valuable for smaller teams. Consider your immediate security needs and growth plans when choosing.
Which has better support: Myra Hyperscale WAF or NAXSI?
Myra Hyperscale WAF has a higher support rating (4.5/5) compared to NAXSI (2.5/5). However, support quality can vary based on your plan tier - enterprise customers typically receive more responsive support from both providers. Consider evaluating support during a trial period.
Which is easier to implement: Myra Hyperscale WAF or NAXSI?
Myra Hyperscale WAF scores higher for ease of use (4.0/5) versus NAXSI (2.8/5). The actual implementation effort depends on your existing infrastructure and team expertise.
Which is more cost-effective: Myra Hyperscale WAF or NAXSI?
NAXSI offers a free tier while Myra Hyperscale WAF requires a paid plan. NAXSI scores higher for value (4.5/5). Total cost depends on your traffic volume, required features, and support level needs.
Which works better with AWS: Myra Hyperscale WAF or NAXSI?
Myra Hyperscale WAF explicitly supports AWS while NAXSI's AWS integration may vary. Consider whether native AWS integration or cross-cloud portability matters more for your use case.