BunkerWeb Open Source WAF vs Cloudbric Web Application Firewall

BunkerWeb Open Source WAF and Cloudbric Web Application Firewall take different approaches to web application security. Consider your team's expertise and infrastructure preferences when evaluating these options.

BunkerWeb Open Source WAF and Cloudbric Web Application Firewall take fundamentally different approaches to web application security. Understanding your infrastructure and team capabilities will help determine which approach fits your needs.

Overview

BunkerWeb Open Source WAF and Cloudbric Web Application Firewall are both popular web application firewall solutions. This comparison will help you understand the key differences and choose the right one for your needs.

Next-generation open source WAF built on NGINX with ModSecurity integration, offering comprehensive web security with an intuitive web UI and extensive plugin system.

AI-powered cloud WAF from South Korea offering OWASP protection, DDoS mitigation, and SSL management with a focus on the APAC market.

Quick Comparison

Feature BunkerWeb Open Source WAF Cloudbric Web Application Firewall
Overall Rating 4.0/5 3.5/5
Free Tier Yes Yes
Pricing Model Free (Open Source) / Pro Support Free tier; paid plans quoted by traffic volume
Ease of Use 3.8/5 4.0/5
Value for Money 4.9/5 3.8/5
Support 3.2/5 3.3/5
Open Source Yes No
Platforms Linux, Docker, Docker Swarm, Kubernetes, any NGINX-compatible environment Any web application (DNS-based)
Compliance N/A (self-hosted, compliance depends on implementation) ISO 27001, ISO 27017, CSA STAR

Pricing Comparison

BunkerWeb Open Source WAF

Model: Free (Open Source) / Pro Support

Free Tier Available

Community Edition

Free

Pro Support

Contact for pricing

View full pricing →

Cloudbric Web Application Firewall

Model: Free tier; paid plans quoted by traffic volume

Free Tier Available

Free

Free

Paid

Custom pricing

View full pricing →

Features Comparison

BunkerWeb Open Source WAF

  • ModSecurity Integration

    Built-in ModSecurity WAF with OWASP Core Rule Set for comprehensive protection against web application attacks.

  • Bot Protection

    Block malicious bots with challenge-based verification using cookies, JavaScript tests, captchas, or third-party services.

  • Rate Limiting & DDoS Protection

    Limit connections and requests from clients, automatically ban suspicious activities triggering abnormal HTTP status codes.

  • IP Reputation

    Block known bad IPs using external blacklists and DNSBL integration.

  • Web UI Management

    User-friendly graphical interface for configuration and monitoring without command-line expertise.

  • Plugin System

    Extend functionality with official and community plugins including ClamAV antivirus, Coraza WAF, and notification integrations.

Cloudbric Web Application Firewall

  • Deep Learning Detection

    AI-powered threat detection using deep learning instead of pure signature matching.

  • DDoS Protection

    Layer 3/4/7 DDoS mitigation included with WAF service.

  • Free SSL Management

    Automatic SSL certificate provisioning and management.

Which One Is Right for You?

The best WAF depends on your specific requirements, infrastructure, and team expertise.

BunkerWeb Open Source WAF

  • You need: Security-conscious organizations wanting data control, DevOps teams comfortable with self-hosting, budget-constrained projects, privacy-focused deployments
  • You want to start with a free tier
  • You prefer open-source solutions
  • You're using: Linux, Docker, Docker Swarm, Kubernetes, any NGINX-compatible environment
Learn more →

Cloudbric Web Application Firewall

  • You need: APAC-focused businesses, small to mid-size websites, budget-conscious organizations
  • You want to start with a free tier
  • You're using: Any web application (DNS-based)
Learn more →

We recommend evaluating both options with a trial or free tier before committing. Consider your existing infrastructure, team expertise, compliance requirements, and budget.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better for startups: BunkerWeb Open Source WAF or Cloudbric Web Application Firewall?

Both BunkerWeb Open Source WAF and Cloudbric Web Application Firewall offer free tiers, making them accessible for startups. Cloudbric Web Application Firewall scores higher for ease of use (4.0/5), which is valuable for smaller teams. Consider your immediate security needs and growth plans when choosing.

Which has better support: BunkerWeb Open Source WAF or Cloudbric Web Application Firewall?

Cloudbric Web Application Firewall has a higher support rating (3.3/5) compared to BunkerWeb Open Source WAF (3.2/5). However, support quality can vary based on your plan tier - enterprise customers typically receive more responsive support from both providers. Consider evaluating support during a trial period.

Which is easier to implement: BunkerWeb Open Source WAF or Cloudbric Web Application Firewall?

Cloudbric Web Application Firewall scores higher for ease of use (4.0/5) versus BunkerWeb Open Source WAF (3.8/5). The actual implementation effort depends on your existing infrastructure and team expertise.

Which is more cost-effective: BunkerWeb Open Source WAF or Cloudbric Web Application Firewall?

Both providers offer free tiers, making it easy to start without commitment. BunkerWeb Open Source WAF scores higher for value (4.9/5). Total cost depends on your traffic volume, required features, and support level needs.

What's the difference between BunkerWeb Open Source WAF (open source) and Cloudbric Web Application Firewall (commercial)?

BunkerWeb Open Source WAF is open source, which means you can inspect the code, customize it, and self-host without licensing fees. Cloudbric Web Application Firewall is a commercial solution with managed support and regular updates. Open source is ideal if you have in-house expertise and want full control. Commercial solutions are better if you prefer managed security with vendor support.