Barracuda Web Application Firewall vs Sophos Firewall (XGS)

Both Barracuda Web Application Firewall and Sophos Firewall (XGS) are capable WAF solutions. The right choice depends on your specific infrastructure, budget, and feature requirements.

Overview

Barracuda Web Application Firewall and Sophos Firewall (XGS) are both popular web application firewall solutions. This comparison will help you understand the key differences and choose the right one for your needs.

Comprehensive WAF with flexible deployment options from appliances to cloud, featuring strong bot defense, API protection, and deep DevOps integration.

Next-gen firewall (SFOS on XGS appliances) with a built-in reverse-proxy Web Application Firewall via its Web Server Protection module; the active successor to the end-of-life Sophos UTM.

Quick Comparison

Feature Barracuda Web Application Firewall Sophos Firewall (XGS)
Overall Rating 4.1/5 3.8/5
Free Tier No Yes
Pricing Model Appliance + subscription / WAF-as-a-Service Appliance plus subscription (varies by appliance and subscription bundle)
Ease of Use 3.5/5 3.9/5
Value for Money 4.2/5 4.0/5
Support 4.0/5 3.8/5
Platforms Any web application, AWS, Azure, GCP, VMware, Hyper-V, on-premises XGS Series hardware appliances, virtual (VMware, Hyper-V, KVM), software/Home Edition, and cloud (Firewall in AWS and Azure)
Compliance PCI DSS, HIPAA, SOC 2, FIPS 140-2 Common Criteria, FIPS-validated cryptography (model dependent)

Pricing Comparison

Barracuda Web Application Firewall

Model: Appliance + subscription / WAF-as-a-Service

WAF-as-a-Service Basic

Starting ~$99/month

WAF-as-a-Service Advanced

Starting ~$299/month

WAF Appliance

Contact for pricing

View full pricing →

Sophos Firewall (XGS)

Model: Appliance plus subscription (varies by appliance and subscription bundle)

Free Tier Available

Home Edition

Free

Xstream Protection (Commercial)

Custom pricing

View full pricing →

Features Comparison

Barracuda Web Application Firewall

  • Advanced Bot Protection

    Machine learning-powered detection distinguishes malicious bots from legitimate traffic and good bots.

  • API Discovery & Protection

    Automatically discover APIs and generate security rules from OpenAPI definition files.

  • JSON & XML Security

    Deep inspection of JSON payloads and XML protection against schema poisoning attacks.

  • SSL/TLS Offloading

    Hardware-accelerated SSL termination with support for modern TLS protocols and cipher suites.

  • DevOps Integration

    Full REST API with OpenAPI spec and native support for IaC tools like Terraform and Ansible.

  • Active Directory Integration

    Integrate with AD, LDAP, RADIUS for authentication with SAML SSO and two-factor authentication support.

Sophos Firewall (XGS)

  • Reverse-Proxy WAF

    Apache-based reverse proxy that protects published web servers against SQL injection, cross-site scripting, directory traversal, and other common web attacks.

  • Form Hardening

    Signs and validates form fields to prevent manipulation of submitted web forms.

  • URL Hardening

    Restricts accessible URLs based on the learned structure of the protected application.

  • Cookie Signing

    Cryptographically signs cookies to detect and block tampering.

  • Reverse-Proxy Authentication

    Adds basic or form-based authentication policies in front of published web servers via WAF rules.

  • Antivirus Scanning

    Scans uploads and traffic to protected web servers for malware as part of Web Server Protection.

Which One Is Right for You?

The best WAF depends on your specific requirements, infrastructure, and team expertise.

Barracuda Web Application Firewall

  • You need: Mid-market organizations, DevOps teams, hybrid deployments, organizations needing on-premises WAF options
  • You're using: Any web application, AWS, Azure, GCP, VMware, Hyper-V, on-premises
Learn more →

Sophos Firewall (XGS)

  • You need: Organizations already running Sophos Firewall, businesses wanting WAF and network security in one appliance, home labs and educational users via the free Home Edition
  • You want to start with a free tier
  • You're using: XGS Series hardware appliances, virtual (VMware, Hyper-V, KVM), software/Home Edition, and cloud (Firewall in AWS and Azure)
Learn more →

We recommend evaluating both options with a trial or free tier before committing. Consider your existing infrastructure, team expertise, compliance requirements, and budget.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better for startups: Barracuda Web Application Firewall or Sophos Firewall (XGS)?

Sophos Firewall (XGS) offers a free tier while Barracuda Web Application Firewall does not, making Sophos Firewall (XGS) more accessible for budget-conscious startups. Sophos Firewall (XGS) scores higher for ease of use (3.9/5), which is valuable for smaller teams. Consider your immediate security needs and growth plans when choosing.

Which has better support: Barracuda Web Application Firewall or Sophos Firewall (XGS)?

Barracuda Web Application Firewall has a higher support rating (4.0/5) compared to Sophos Firewall (XGS) (3.8/5). However, support quality can vary based on your plan tier - enterprise customers typically receive more responsive support from both providers. Consider evaluating support during a trial period.

Which is easier to implement: Barracuda Web Application Firewall or Sophos Firewall (XGS)?

Sophos Firewall (XGS) scores higher for ease of use (3.9/5) versus Barracuda Web Application Firewall (3.5/5). The actual implementation effort depends on your existing infrastructure and team expertise.

Which is more cost-effective: Barracuda Web Application Firewall or Sophos Firewall (XGS)?

Sophos Firewall (XGS) offers a free tier while Barracuda Web Application Firewall requires a paid plan. Barracuda Web Application Firewall scores higher for value (4.2/5). Total cost depends on your traffic volume, required features, and support level needs.

Which works better with AWS: Barracuda Web Application Firewall or Sophos Firewall (XGS)?

Both Barracuda Web Application Firewall and Sophos Firewall (XGS) support AWS deployments. Consider whether native AWS integration or cross-cloud portability matters more for your use case.