WAF Comparisons
Compare 231+ WAF providers head-to-head.
Compare Any Two WAFs
231+ comparisons available. Pick any two providers:
Popular Comparisons
GCP-native WAF vs Palo Alto's container-first WAAS. Both protect cloud workloads, but Cloud Armor is built into GCP's load balancer while Prisma runs as a sidecar in your clusters.
Two CNAPP giants with WAF capabilities. Check Point brings decades of firewall expertise to the cloud; Palo Alto leads in runtime container protection. Which security platform fits your stack?
The old guard vs the new challenger in open-source WAFs. ModSecurity has 20 years of CRS rules; BunkerWeb wraps it in a modern web UI with Docker-native deployment.
CDN-integrated edge WAF vs dedicated application security. Akamai protects at 4,200+ edge locations; Radware focuses on behavioral-based bot detection and DDoS mitigation.
Enterprise container security vs WordPress-friendly cloud WAF. Completely different markets: Prisma protects Kubernetes workloads, Sucuri protects websites with a simple DNS change.
The two most-compared enterprise WAFs. Akamai wins on CDN-integrated edge security; Imperva wins on hybrid multi-cloud deployment and advanced bot classification.
Australian performance-focused WAF vs Palo Alto's container security platform. Peakhour combines CDN + WAF for speed-sensitive sites; Prisma secures cloud-native applications.
Pay-per-rule cloud-native WAF vs dedicated security appliance. AWS WAF is cheapest if you're already on AWS; Radware offers more sophisticated bot and DDoS protection.
Cloud edge WAF vs inline software WAF. Akamai is a managed reverse proxy; NGINX App Protect (now F5 WAF for NGINX) runs inside your NGINX instances for zero-latency inspection.
Microsoft's cloud-native WAF vs an independent website security service. Azure WAF integrates with Application Gateway and Front Door; Sucuri works with any hosting provider.
E-commerce security specialist vs WordPress security leader. Sansec focuses on Magento/Adobe Commerce skimming attacks; Wordfence protects WordPress with endpoint firewall rules.
Established enterprise WAF vs API-first security platform. Imperva has broader WAF features; Wallarm specializes in API discovery and protection for modern architectures.
AWS-native pay-per-use WAF vs all-in-one website security. AWS WAF needs you to write rules; Sucuri includes managed rules, CDN, and malware cleanup in one package.
Managed cloud WAF vs self-hosted open-source WAF. Cloud Armor is zero-maintenance but GCP-only; ModSecurity runs anywhere with full OWASP CRS and unlimited customization.
Free Docker-native WAF vs commercial API security. BunkerWeb is open-source with a web UI; Wallarm offers AI-powered API discovery and automatic rule generation.
Commercial appliance WAF vs free open-source alternative. Barracuda offers hardware/virtual appliances with vendor support; BunkerWeb gives you similar protection for free.
Two CDN giants with built-in WAF. Akamai has the largest edge network; Fastly's Signal Sciences WAF is developer-friendly with real-time visibility and no tuning required.
Commercial WAF appliance vs free open-source WAF engine. Barracuda gives you a managed box with support; ModSecurity gives you unlimited flexibility and zero licensing cost.
AWS-native WAF vs European cloud WAF provider. AWS WAF is cheapest on AWS infrastructure; UBIKA (Rohde & Schwarz) offers GDPR-focused European data sovereignty.
The open-source standard vs the AI-powered challenger. ModSecurity relies on regex rules you maintain; Wallarm uses machine learning to auto-discover and protect APIs.
Self-hosted WAF engine vs managed website security. ModSecurity is free but you handle everything; Sucuri manages WAF rules, CDN, monitoring, and malware cleanup for you.
Enterprise CDN+WAF vs website security for small/medium businesses. Akamai starts at $30K+/year; Sucuri starts at $199/year. Very different price points, overlapping features.
Looking for individual reviews?
Browse our detailed WAF provider reviews with ratings, features, and pricing.