WAFPlanet

AWS Web Application Firewall vs Imperva Web Application Firewall

Both AWS Web Application Firewall and Imperva Web Application Firewall are capable WAF solutions. The right choice depends on your specific infrastructure, budget, and feature requirements.

Übersicht

AWS Web Application Firewall and Imperva Web Application Firewall are both popular web application firewall solutions. This comparison will help you understand the key differences and choose the right one for your needs.

Native AWS security service providing scalable WAF protection for applications hosted on AWS infrastructure with pay-per-use pricing.

Enterprise-Cloud-WAF mit branchenführender Bedrohungsforschung, die umfassende Anwendungssicherheit mit fortschrittlichem Bot-Schutz und API-Sicherheit bietet.

Schnellvergleich

Funktion AWS Web Application Firewall Imperva Web Application Firewall
Overall Rating 4.3/5 4.4/5
Free Tier No No
Pricing Model Pay-per-use (rules + requests) Individuelle Enterprise-Preise
Ease of Use 3.5/5 3.5/5
Value for Money 4.0/5 3.7/5
Support 4.0/5 4.5/5
Platforms AWS CloudFront, ALB, API Gateway, AppSync, Cognito, App Runner, Verified Access Jede Webanwendung, AWS, Azure, GCP, Kubernetes, On-Premise
Compliance SOC 1/2/3, PCI DSS, HIPAA, FedRAMP, ISO 27001 SOC 2, PCI DSS, HIPAA, ISO 27001, ISO 27017, ISO 27018

Preisvergleich

AWS Web Application Firewall

Modell: Pay-per-use (rules + requests)

Small (1 ACL, 10 rules)

$15/month + $0.60/M requests

Medium (2 ACL, 25 rules)

$35/month + $0.60/M requests

Large (5 ACL, 50 rules)

$75/month + $0.60/M requests

Vollständige Preise anzeigen →

Imperva Web Application Firewall

Modell: Individuelle Enterprise-Preise

Pro

Ab ca. 59$/Monat

Business

Ab ca. 299$/Monat

Enterprise

Individuelle Preise

Vollständige Preise anzeigen →

Funktionsvergleich

AWS Web Application Firewall

  • AWS Managed Rules

    Pre-configured rule groups maintained by AWS and AWS Marketplace sellers for common threats.

  • Custom Rules

    Build your own rules using conditions like IP addresses, HTTP headers, URI strings, and more.

  • Rate-Based Rules

    Automatically block IPs that exceed defined request thresholds.

  • Bot Control

    Managed rule group for detecting and managing bot traffic (additional cost).

  • Fraud Control

    Account takeover prevention and creation fraud detection for login/signup pages.

  • Firewall Manager Integration

    Centrally configure and manage WAF rules across multiple AWS accounts.

Imperva Web Application Firewall

  • Erweiterter Bot-Schutz

    ML-gestützte Bot-Erkennung, die zwischen legitimen Benutzern, guten Bots und bösartiger Automatisierung unterscheidet.

  • API-Sicherheit

    Erkennung, Klassifizierung und Schutz von APIs mit Schema-Validierung, Anomalie-Erkennung und positivem Sicherheitsmodell.

  • Account-Übernahme-Schutz

    Erkennung und Verhinderung von Credential Stuffing und Account-Übernahme-Angriffen durch Verhaltensanalyse.

  • Client-Side Protection

    Überwachung und Schutz vor clientseitigen Angriffen wie Magecart, Formjacking und Supply-Chain-Kompromittierungen.

  • Attack Analytics

    KI-gestützte Analyse von Sicherheitsereignissen zur Identifizierung von Angriffskampagnen und Reduzierung der Alert-Müdigkeit.

  • Virtual Patching

    Sofortiger Schutz gegen bekannte Schwachstellen, während Sie an permanenten Fixes arbeiten.

Which One Is Right for You?

The best WAF depends on your specific requirements, infrastructure, and team expertise.

AWS Web Application Firewall

  • You need: AWS-native applications, organizations already invested in AWS ecosystem, variable traffic workloads, multi-account AWS environments
  • You're using: AWS CloudFront, ALB, API Gateway, AppSync, Cognito, App Runner, Verified Access
Mehr erfahren →

Imperva Web Application Firewall

  • You need: Große Unternehmen, Organisationen mit anspruchsvollen Sicherheitsanforderungen, Unternehmen, die fortschrittliches Bot-Management benötigen, regulierte Branchen
  • You're using: Jede Webanwendung, AWS, Azure, GCP, Kubernetes, On-Premise
Mehr erfahren →

We recommend evaluating both options with a trial or free tier before committing. Consider your existing infrastructure, team expertise, compliance requirements, and budget.

Häufig gestellte Fragen

Which has better support: AWS Web Application Firewall or Imperva Web Application Firewall?

Imperva Web Application Firewall has a higher support rating (4.5/5) compared to AWS Web Application Firewall (4.0/5). However, support quality can vary based on your plan tier - enterprise customers typically receive more responsive support from both providers. Consider evaluating support during a trial period.

Which is easier to implement: AWS Web Application Firewall or Imperva Web Application Firewall?

Imperva Web Application Firewall scores higher for ease of use (3.5/5) versus AWS Web Application Firewall (3.5/5). The actual implementation effort depends on your existing infrastructure and team expertise.

Which is more cost-effective: AWS Web Application Firewall or Imperva Web Application Firewall?

Neither provider offers a completely free tier. AWS Web Application Firewall scores higher for value (4.0/5). Total cost depends on your traffic volume, required features, and support level needs.

Which works better with AWS: AWS Web Application Firewall or Imperva Web Application Firewall?

AWS Web Application Firewall is AWS's native WAF solution, offering the tightest integration with AWS services like CloudFront, ALB, and API Gateway. Imperva Web Application Firewall can also protect AWS workloads but requires additional configuration. Consider whether native AWS integration or cross-cloud portability matters more for your use case.