WAFPlanet

Tempesta FW vs UBIKA WAAP

Tempesta FW and UBIKA WAAP take different approaches to web application security. Consider your team's expertise and infrastructure preferences when evaluating these options.

View Tempesta FW Review View UBIKA WAAP Review

Tempesta FW and UBIKA WAAP take fundamentally different approaches to web application security. Understanding your infrastructure and team capabilities will help determine which approach fits your needs.

Overview

Tempesta FW and UBIKA WAAP are both popular web application firewall solutions. This comparison will help you understand the key differences and choose the right one for your needs.

High-performance open-source WAF and web accelerator built directly into the Linux kernel, delivering up to 1.8M requests per second with integrated L3-L7 DDoS protection and automated bot mitigation via WebShield.

European sovereign WAF offering comprehensive application and API protection with EU data residency guarantees and flexible SaaS or cloud deployment options.

Quick Comparison

Feature Tempesta FW UBIKA WAAP
Overall Rating 4.0/5 4.0/5
Free Tier Yes No
Pricing Model Free (open source) + professional services Subscription / Pay-as-you-go
Ease of Use 2.5/5 3.7/5
Value for Money 4.8/5 4.0/5
Support 3.0/5 4.1/5
Open Source Yes No
Platforms Linux (kernel-level integration), bare metal, cloud VMs Any web application, AWS, Azure, on-premises, hybrid cloud
Compliance Contact vendor ISO 27001, HDS (Health Data Hosting), SecNumCloud, GDPR, PCI DSS

Pricing Comparison

Tempesta FW

Model: Free (open source) + professional services

Free Tier Available

Open Source

Free

Professional Services

Contact for pricing

View full pricing →

UBIKA WAAP

Model: Subscription / Pay-as-you-go

Cloud Protector SaaS

Subscription-based

WAAP Cloud

Pay-as-you-go / BYOL

Enterprise

Custom pricing

View full pricing →

Features Comparison

Tempesta FW

  • Kernel-Level Performance

    Built directly into Linux TCP/IP stack, processing up to 1.8M HTTP requests per second - 3x faster than Nginx or HAProxy.

  • Multi-Layer DDoS Protection

    Integrated protection against volumetric and application-layer DDoS attacks with rate limiting, JavaScript challenges, and adaptive QoS.

  • HTTP Tables

    Extends Linux iptables/nftables for application-layer filtering, enabling rules that combine IP addresses with HTTP headers and content.

  • Intelligent Load Balancing

    Machine learning-powered load balancing with persistent sessions, weighted round-robin, and rendezvous hashing strategies.

  • Web Acceleration

    Built-in caching using Tempesta DB, an ultra-fast in-memory database with NUMA-aware distribution and SIMD optimizations.

  • High-Performance TLS

    Tempesta TLS is 40-80% faster than Nginx/OpenSSL with 4x lower latency for TLS handshakes.

  • Bot Protection (WebShield)

    Open-source automated bot protection via WebShield — detects and blocks DDoS bots, scrapers, shopping bots, and booking bots using TLS and HTTP fingerprint analysis on access logs stored in ClickHouse.

  • Volumetric DDoS Protection

    Upcoming open-source volumetric DDoS protection solution, completing a full L3-L7 DDoS and bot mitigation stack when combined with Tempesta FW's application-layer defences and WebShield.

  • Native XDP Integration

    Uses Linux XDP (eXpress Data Path) for early packet dropping, enabling efficient mitigation of volumetric attacks.

UBIKA WAAP

  • EU Data Sovereignty

    Hosted in OVHcloud European data centers, not subject to US Cloud Act or other extraterritorial laws.

  • Workflow Technology

    Unique visual workflow design for security policies allows tailoring protection to specific application requirements.

  • API Protection

    Advanced API security with JWT/OAuth support, JSON/XML filtering, and OpenAPI schema validation.

  • DDoS Protection

    Network and application-layer DDoS mitigation with global caching and acceleration.

  • DevOps Integration

    Infrastructure-as-Code support with REST API and gRPC (Appsecctl) for CI/CD pipeline integration.

  • Managed Security Services

    Optional MSS with proactive monitoring, false positive management, and monthly security reporting.

Which One Is Right for You?

The best WAF depends on your specific requirements, infrastructure, and team expertise.

Tempesta FW

  • You need: High-traffic sites requiring maximum performance, organizations with Linux expertise, teams wanting to replace multiple infrastructure components, performance-critical applications
  • You want to start with a free tier
  • You prefer open-source solutions
  • You're using: Linux (kernel-level integration), bare metal, cloud VMs
Learn more →

UBIKA WAAP

  • You need: European enterprises, regulated industries (healthcare, finance), organizations requiring EU data residency, French public sector
  • You're using: Any web application, AWS, Azure, on-premises, hybrid cloud
Learn more →

We recommend evaluating both options with a trial or free tier before committing. Consider your existing infrastructure, team expertise, compliance requirements, and budget.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better for startups: Tempesta FW or UBIKA WAAP?

Tempesta FW offers a free tier while UBIKA WAAP does not, which may be important for early-stage startups. UBIKA WAAP scores higher for ease of use (3.7/5), which is valuable for smaller teams. Consider your immediate security needs and growth plans when choosing.

Which has better support: Tempesta FW or UBIKA WAAP?

UBIKA WAAP has a higher support rating (4.1/5) compared to Tempesta FW (3.0/5). However, support quality can vary based on your plan tier - enterprise customers typically receive more responsive support from both providers. Consider evaluating support during a trial period.

Which is easier to implement: Tempesta FW or UBIKA WAAP?

UBIKA WAAP scores higher for ease of use (3.7/5) versus Tempesta FW (2.5/5). The actual implementation effort depends on your existing infrastructure and team expertise.

Which is more cost-effective: Tempesta FW or UBIKA WAAP?

Tempesta FW offers a free tier while UBIKA WAAP requires a paid plan. Tempesta FW scores higher for value (4.8/5). Total cost depends on your traffic volume, required features, and support level needs.

Which works better with AWS: Tempesta FW or UBIKA WAAP?

UBIKA WAAP explicitly supports AWS while Tempesta FW's AWS integration may vary. Consider whether native AWS integration or cross-cloud portability matters more for your use case.