Solid Security (formerly iThemes Security) vs UBIKA WAAP
Solid Security (formerly iThemes Security) and UBIKA WAAP take different approaches to web application security. Consider your team's expertise and infrastructure preferences when evaluating these options.
Solid Security (formerly iThemes Security) and UBIKA WAAP take fundamentally different approaches to web application security. Understanding your infrastructure and team capabilities will help determine which approach fits your needs.
Overview
Solid Security (formerly iThemes Security) and UBIKA WAAP are both popular web application firewall solutions. This comparison will help you understand the key differences and choose the right one for your needs.
Comprehensive WordPress security plugin with Patchstack-powered firewall rules, virtual patching, two-factor authentication, and site scanning for proactive protection.
European sovereign WAF offering comprehensive application and API protection with EU data residency guarantees and flexible SaaS or cloud deployment options.
Quick Comparison
| Feature | Solid Security (formerly iThemes Security) | UBIKA WAAP |
|---|---|---|
| Overall Rating | 4.1/5 | 4.0/5 |
| Free Tier | Yes | No |
| Pricing Model | Freemium (Free tier + annual Pro license) | Subscription / Pay-as-you-go |
| Ease of Use | 4.3/5 | 3.7/5 |
| Value for Money | 4.2/5 | 4.0/5 |
| Support | 4.0/5 | 4.1/5 |
| Open Source | Yes | No |
| Platforms | WordPress (self-hosted) | Any web application, AWS, Azure, on-premises, hybrid cloud |
| Compliance | Contact vendor | ISO 27001, HDS (Health Data Hosting), SecNumCloud, GDPR, PCI DSS |
Pricing Comparison
Solid Security (formerly iThemes Security)
Model: Freemium (Free tier + annual Pro license)
Free Tier AvailableFree
$0
Pro (1 site)
$99/year (~$8.25/month)
Pro (multi-site)
From $199/year
UBIKA WAAP
Model: Subscription / Pay-as-you-go
Cloud Protector SaaS
Subscription-based
WAAP Cloud
Pay-as-you-go / BYOL
Enterprise
Custom pricing
Features Comparison
Solid Security (formerly iThemes Security)
-
Patchstack Firewall
Virtual patching rules powered by Patchstack that protect against known plugin and theme vulnerabilities automatically.
-
Two-Factor Authentication
Multiple 2FA methods including authenticator apps, email codes, and backup codes for all user roles.
-
Passwordless Login
Login via passkeys and biometrics, eliminating password-based attacks entirely (Pro feature).
-
Site Scanner
Checks for known malware, vulnerabilities in plugins and themes, and blocklist status.
-
File Change Detection
Monitors WordPress core files and alerts when unexpected changes are detected.
-
Security Dashboard
Unified dashboard showing security status, recent events, and actionable recommendations.
-
Trusted Devices
Recognizes trusted devices and restricts admin access from unknown devices (Pro feature).
UBIKA WAAP
-
EU Data Sovereignty
Hosted in OVHcloud European data centers, not subject to US Cloud Act or other extraterritorial laws.
-
Workflow Technology
Unique visual workflow design for security policies allows tailoring protection to specific application requirements.
-
API Protection
Advanced API security with JWT/OAuth support, JSON/XML filtering, and OpenAPI schema validation.
-
DDoS Protection
Network and application-layer DDoS mitigation with global caching and acceleration.
-
DevOps Integration
Infrastructure-as-Code support with REST API and gRPC (Appsecctl) for CI/CD pipeline integration.
-
Managed Security Services
Optional MSS with proactive monitoring, false positive management, and monthly security reporting.
Which One Is Right for You?
The best WAF depends on your specific requirements, infrastructure, and team expertise.
Solid Security (formerly iThemes Security)
- You need: WordPress agencies managing multiple sites, users wanting modern authentication features like passkeys, sites needing automatic virtual patching for plugin vulnerabilities
- You want to start with a free tier
- You prefer open-source solutions
- You're using: WordPress (self-hosted)
UBIKA WAAP
- You need: European enterprises, regulated industries (healthcare, finance), organizations requiring EU data residency, French public sector
- You're using: Any web application, AWS, Azure, on-premises, hybrid cloud
We recommend evaluating both options with a trial or free tier before committing. Consider your existing infrastructure, team expertise, compliance requirements, and budget.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is better for startups: Solid Security (formerly iThemes Security) or UBIKA WAAP?
Solid Security (formerly iThemes Security) offers a free tier while UBIKA WAAP does not, which may be important for early-stage startups. Solid Security (formerly iThemes Security) scores higher for ease of use (4.3/5), which is valuable for smaller teams. Consider your immediate security needs and growth plans when choosing.
Which has better support: Solid Security (formerly iThemes Security) or UBIKA WAAP?
UBIKA WAAP has a higher support rating (4.1/5) compared to Solid Security (formerly iThemes Security) (4.0/5). However, support quality can vary based on your plan tier - enterprise customers typically receive more responsive support from both providers. Consider evaluating support during a trial period.
Which is easier to implement: Solid Security (formerly iThemes Security) or UBIKA WAAP?
Solid Security (formerly iThemes Security) scores higher for ease of use (4.3/5) versus UBIKA WAAP (3.7/5). The actual implementation effort depends on your existing infrastructure and team expertise.
Which is more cost-effective: Solid Security (formerly iThemes Security) or UBIKA WAAP?
Solid Security (formerly iThemes Security) offers a free tier while UBIKA WAAP requires a paid plan. Solid Security (formerly iThemes Security) scores higher for value (4.2/5). Total cost depends on your traffic volume, required features, and support level needs.
Which works better with AWS: Solid Security (formerly iThemes Security) or UBIKA WAAP?
UBIKA WAAP explicitly supports AWS while Solid Security (formerly iThemes Security)'s AWS integration may vary. Consider whether native AWS integration or cross-cloud portability matters more for your use case.