WAFPlanet

Reblaze (Link11) Web Security vs Tempesta FW

Reblaze (Link11) Web Security and Tempesta FW take different approaches to web application security. Consider your team's expertise and infrastructure preferences when evaluating these options.

Reblaze (Link11) Web Security and Tempesta FW take fundamentally different approaches to web application security. Understanding your infrastructure and team capabilities will help determine which approach fits your needs.

Overview

Reblaze (Link11) Web Security and Tempesta FW are both popular web application firewall solutions. This comparison will help you understand the key differences and choose the right one for your needs.

Cloud-native WAAP platform offering fully managed WAF, bot management, and DDoS protection with private cloud deployment options for enhanced data privacy.

High-performance open-source WAF and web accelerator built directly into the Linux kernel, delivering up to 1.8M requests per second with integrated L3-L7 DDoS protection and automated bot mitigation via WebShield.

Quick Comparison

Feature Reblaze (Link11) Web Security Tempesta FW
Overall Rating 4.1/5 4.0/5
Free Tier No Yes
Pricing Model Custom enterprise pricing Free (open source) + professional services
Ease of Use 4.0/5 2.5/5
Value for Money 3.6/5 4.8/5
Support 4.4/5 3.0/5
Open Source No Yes
Platforms Any web application, AWS, Azure, GCP, private cloud Linux (kernel-level integration), bare metal, cloud VMs
Compliance SOC 2, ISO 27001, GDPR, PCI DSS Contact vendor

Pricing Comparison

Reblaze (Link11) Web Security

Model: Custom enterprise pricing

Standard

Custom pricing

Enterprise

Custom pricing

View full pricing →

Tempesta FW

Model: Free (open source) + professional services

Free Tier Available

Open Source

Free

Professional Services

Contact for pricing

View full pricing →

Features Comparison

Reblaze (Link11) Web Security

  • Private Cloud Deployment

    Dedicated virtual private cloud per customer eliminates multi-tenant security concerns and enhances data privacy.

  • Machine Learning Detection

    ML-powered traffic analysis automatically identifies and blocks malicious requests while allowing legitimate traffic.

  • Bot Management

    Advanced bot detection distinguishing between legitimate users, good bots (search engines), and malicious automation.

  • DDoS Protection

    Integrated Link11 DDoS mitigation with global scrubbing network for volumetric and application-layer attacks.

  • API Security

    Protection for REST and GraphQL APIs with schema validation and anomaly detection.

  • Managed SOC

    24/7 Security Operations Center monitoring with expert incident response and threat hunting.

Tempesta FW

  • Kernel-Level Performance

    Built directly into Linux TCP/IP stack, processing up to 1.8M HTTP requests per second - 3x faster than Nginx or HAProxy.

  • Multi-Layer DDoS Protection

    Integrated protection against volumetric and application-layer DDoS attacks with rate limiting, JavaScript challenges, and adaptive QoS.

  • HTTP Tables

    Extends Linux iptables/nftables for application-layer filtering, enabling rules that combine IP addresses with HTTP headers and content.

  • Intelligent Load Balancing

    Machine learning-powered load balancing with persistent sessions, weighted round-robin, and rendezvous hashing strategies.

  • Web Acceleration

    Built-in caching using Tempesta DB, an ultra-fast in-memory database with NUMA-aware distribution and SIMD optimizations.

  • High-Performance TLS

    Tempesta TLS is 40-80% faster than Nginx/OpenSSL with 4x lower latency for TLS handshakes.

  • Bot Protection (WebShield)

    Open-source automated bot protection via WebShield — detects and blocks DDoS bots, scrapers, shopping bots, and booking bots using TLS and HTTP fingerprint analysis on access logs stored in ClickHouse.

  • Volumetric DDoS Protection

    Upcoming open-source volumetric DDoS protection solution, completing a full L3-L7 DDoS and bot mitigation stack when combined with Tempesta FW's application-layer defences and WebShield.

  • Native XDP Integration

    Uses Linux XDP (eXpress Data Path) for early packet dropping, enabling efficient mitigation of volumetric attacks.

Which One Is Right for You?

The best WAF depends on your specific requirements, infrastructure, and team expertise.

Reblaze (Link11) Web Security

  • You need: European enterprises requiring data sovereignty, organizations wanting managed security services, privacy-conscious deployments
  • You're using: Any web application, AWS, Azure, GCP, private cloud
Learn more →

Tempesta FW

  • You need: High-traffic sites requiring maximum performance, organizations with Linux expertise, teams wanting to replace multiple infrastructure components, performance-critical applications
  • You want to start with a free tier
  • You prefer open-source solutions
  • You're using: Linux (kernel-level integration), bare metal, cloud VMs
Learn more →

We recommend evaluating both options with a trial or free tier before committing. Consider your existing infrastructure, team expertise, compliance requirements, and budget.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better for startups: Reblaze (Link11) Web Security or Tempesta FW?

Tempesta FW offers a free tier while Reblaze (Link11) Web Security does not, making Tempesta FW more accessible for budget-conscious startups. Reblaze (Link11) Web Security scores higher for ease of use (4.0/5), which is valuable for smaller teams. Consider your immediate security needs and growth plans when choosing.

Which has better support: Reblaze (Link11) Web Security or Tempesta FW?

Reblaze (Link11) Web Security has a higher support rating (4.4/5) compared to Tempesta FW (3.0/5). However, support quality can vary based on your plan tier - enterprise customers typically receive more responsive support from both providers. Consider evaluating support during a trial period.

Which is easier to implement: Reblaze (Link11) Web Security or Tempesta FW?

Reblaze (Link11) Web Security scores higher for ease of use (4.0/5) versus Tempesta FW (2.5/5). The actual implementation effort depends on your existing infrastructure and team expertise.

Which is more cost-effective: Reblaze (Link11) Web Security or Tempesta FW?

Tempesta FW offers a free tier while Reblaze (Link11) Web Security requires a paid plan. Tempesta FW scores higher for value (4.8/5). Total cost depends on your traffic volume, required features, and support level needs.

Which works better with AWS: Reblaze (Link11) Web Security or Tempesta FW?

Reblaze (Link11) Web Security explicitly supports AWS while Tempesta FW's AWS integration may vary. Consider whether native AWS integration or cross-cloud portability matters more for your use case.