WAFPlanet

NinjaFirewall (WP Edition) vs StackPath Web Application Firewall

Both NinjaFirewall (WP Edition) and StackPath Web Application Firewall are capable WAF solutions. The right choice depends on your specific infrastructure, budget, and feature requirements.

Overview

NinjaFirewall (WP Edition) and StackPath Web Application Firewall are both popular web application firewall solutions. This comparison will help you understand the key differences and choose the right one for your needs.

PHP-based WordPress firewall that hooks into WordPress before core loads, providing stand-alone WAF protection with file integrity monitoring and real-time detection without cloud dependency.

Edge-based WAF that was part of StackPath's CDN and edge computing platform. Discontinued in June 2024 when the company shut down operations.

Quick Comparison

Feature NinjaFirewall (WP Edition) StackPath Web Application Firewall
Overall Rating 4.3/5 1.0/5
Free Tier Yes No
Pricing Model Free edition + annual license for premium Per site / Per bandwidth tier (discontinued)
Ease of Use 4.0/5 1.0/5
Value for Money 4.8/5 1.0/5
Support 4.0/5 1.0/5
Platforms WordPress (self-hosted) Cloud (SaaS, discontinued)
Compliance Contact vendor SOC 2, PCI DSS (historical)

Pricing Comparison

NinjaFirewall (WP Edition)

Model: Free edition + annual license for premium

Free Tier Available

WP Edition (Free)

Free

WP+ Edition (1 site)

$34.90/year

WP+ Edition (multi-site)

From $59.90/year

View full pricing →

StackPath Web Application Firewall

Model: Per site / Per bandwidth tier (discontinued)

Edge Delivery 200

$27.50/month

Edge Delivery 2000

$275/month

View full pricing →

Features Comparison

NinjaFirewall (WP Edition)

  • Pre-WordPress Filtering

    Hooks into PHP before WordPress core loads, filtering malicious requests before they reach any WordPress code.

  • File Integrity Monitoring

    Detect unauthorized file changes with scheduled or real-time monitoring of WordPress core, plugins, and themes.

  • Brute Force Protection

    Rate-limit and block brute force attacks against wp-login.php and xmlrpc.php with configurable thresholds.

  • Real-Time Detection

    Immediate alerts for suspicious activity including file modifications, PHP shell uploads, and admin account changes.

  • Event Notifications

    Email alerts for security events including plugin/theme installations, user account changes, and PHP errors.

  • Live Log

    Real-time log viewer showing all HTTP/HTTPS requests processed by the firewall with detailed request data.

StackPath Web Application Firewall

  • Edge WAF

    Application-layer firewall deployed at the edge, filtering traffic before it reached origin servers. Included OWASP Top 10 coverage and custom rule support.

  • DDoS Protection

    Volumetric and application-layer DDoS mitigation integrated with the CDN edge network.

  • Bot Management

    Bot detection and mitigation using behavioral analysis and challenge-based verification.

  • Real-time Analytics

    Dashboard showing traffic patterns, blocked requests, and attack trends across protected sites.

Which One Is Right for You?

The best WAF depends on your specific requirements, infrastructure, and team expertise.

NinjaFirewall (WP Edition)

  • You need: WordPress site owners wanting affordable server-level WAF protection, developers preferring local security without cloud dependencies
  • You want to start with a free tier
  • You're using: WordPress (self-hosted)
Learn more →

StackPath Web Application Firewall

  • You need: Historical reference only. StackPath is no longer available.
  • You're using: Cloud (SaaS, discontinued)
Learn more →

We recommend evaluating both options with a trial or free tier before committing. Consider your existing infrastructure, team expertise, compliance requirements, and budget.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better for startups: NinjaFirewall (WP Edition) or StackPath Web Application Firewall?

NinjaFirewall (WP Edition) offers a free tier while StackPath Web Application Firewall does not, which may be important for early-stage startups. NinjaFirewall (WP Edition) scores higher for ease of use (4.0/5), which is valuable for smaller teams. Consider your immediate security needs and growth plans when choosing.

Which has better support: NinjaFirewall (WP Edition) or StackPath Web Application Firewall?

NinjaFirewall (WP Edition) has a higher support rating (4.0/5) compared to StackPath Web Application Firewall (1.0/5). However, support quality can vary based on your plan tier - enterprise customers typically receive more responsive support from both providers. Consider evaluating support during a trial period.

Which is easier to implement: NinjaFirewall (WP Edition) or StackPath Web Application Firewall?

NinjaFirewall (WP Edition) scores higher for ease of use (4.0/5) versus StackPath Web Application Firewall (1.0/5). The actual implementation effort depends on your existing infrastructure and team expertise.

Which is more cost-effective: NinjaFirewall (WP Edition) or StackPath Web Application Firewall?

NinjaFirewall (WP Edition) offers a free tier while StackPath Web Application Firewall requires a paid plan. NinjaFirewall (WP Edition) scores higher for value (4.8/5). Total cost depends on your traffic volume, required features, and support level needs.

Which is better for WordPress: NinjaFirewall (WP Edition) or StackPath Web Application Firewall?

NinjaFirewall (WP Edition) explicitly supports WordPress while StackPath Web Application Firewall takes a more platform-agnostic approach. For WordPress-specific threats like plugin vulnerabilities and brute force attacks, look for providers with WordPress-specific rule sets.