Kong Gateway WAF vs Tempesta FW
Kong Gateway WAF and Tempesta FW take different approaches to web application security. Consider your team's expertise and infrastructure preferences when evaluating these options.
Kong Gateway WAF and Tempesta FW take fundamentally different approaches to web application security. Understanding your infrastructure and team capabilities will help determine which approach fits your needs.
Overview
Kong Gateway WAF and Tempesta FW are both popular web application firewall solutions. This comparison will help you understand the key differences and choose the right one for your needs.
API gateway with built-in WAF plugin for enterprise customers. Kong is the most popular open source API gateway (35K+ GitHub stars, 312M+ downloads) built on NGINX, processing 400B+ API calls daily. The WAF plugin is an Enterprise-only add-on that protects API endpoints at the gateway layer.
High-performance open-source WAF and web accelerator built directly into the Linux kernel, delivering up to 1.8M requests per second with integrated L3-L7 DDoS protection and automated bot mitigation via WebShield.
Quick Comparison
| Feature | Kong Gateway WAF | Tempesta FW |
|---|---|---|
| Overall Rating | 3.8/5 | 4.0/5 |
| Free Tier | No | Yes |
| Pricing Model | Tiered (Plus per-gateway + Enterprise custom) | Free (open source) + professional services |
| Ease of Use | 3.2/5 | 2.5/5 |
| Value for Money | 3.0/5 | 4.8/5 |
| Support | 4.2/5 | 3.0/5 |
| Open Source | No | Yes |
| Platforms | Linux (Ubuntu, RHEL, Debian, Amazon Linux, Alpine), Docker, Kubernetes (via Ingress Controller and Operator), AWS, Azure, GCP, ARM64, macOS (dev) | Linux (kernel-level integration), bare metal, cloud VMs |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type II, FIPS 140-2 (Enterprise data planes), supports PCI DSS and HIPAA compliance | Contact vendor |
Pricing Comparison
Kong Gateway WAF
Model: Tiered (Plus per-gateway + Enterprise custom)
Kong Gateway OSS
Free
Kong Konnect Plus
From $225/mo
Kong Konnect Enterprise
Custom (annual)
Dedicated Cloud Gateway
$500/mo per control plane + $0.15/GB
Tempesta FW
Model: Free (open source) + professional services
Free Tier AvailableOpen Source
Free
Professional Services
Contact for pricing
Features Comparison
Kong Gateway WAF
-
Gateway-Embedded WAF
WAF runs as a plugin inside the Kong Gateway process, inspecting API traffic at the same layer where routing, authentication, and rate limiting occur. No separate WAF appliance or additional proxy hop needed.
-
OWASP Top 10 Protection
Built-in protection against common web application attacks including SQL injection, cross-site scripting, command injection, and path traversal at the API gateway layer.
-
Plugin Ecosystem
Over 100 plugins for security, traffic control, authentication, and observability. WAF works alongside bot detection, IP restriction, CORS, ACL, and rate limiting plugins in a configurable execution chain.
-
Third-Party WAF Integrations
Open plugin architecture supports third-party WAF engines including open-appsec (ML-driven detection) and Wallarm (API security). Teams can choose the WAF engine that fits their threat model.
-
Kubernetes-Native Deployment
Kong Ingress Controller and Kong Kubernetes Operator provide native Kubernetes integration. WAF policies can be managed declaratively through Kubernetes CRDs alongside gateway configuration.
-
Hybrid Mode
Cloud-managed control plane with self-hosted data planes. WAF policies are centrally managed and distributed to data planes running in any environment, including air-gapped networks.
-
AI Gateway
Dedicated AI gateway capabilities including LLM proxy, token-based rate limiting, semantic caching, PII sanitization, prompt guardrails, and MCP server proxy. WAF protects AI endpoints alongside traditional APIs.
-
Declarative Configuration
Gateway and WAF configuration can be managed as code through declarative YAML/JSON, enabling GitOps workflows and CI/CD pipeline integration for security policy changes.
-
Advanced Rate Limiting
Enterprise-grade rate limiting with sliding window counters, consumer groups, and cluster-wide synchronization. Works in conjunction with WAF to prevent both application-layer attacks and abuse.
Tempesta FW
-
Kernel-Level Performance
Built directly into Linux TCP/IP stack, processing up to 1.8M HTTP requests per second - 3x faster than Nginx or HAProxy.
-
Multi-Layer DDoS Protection
Integrated protection against volumetric and application-layer DDoS attacks with rate limiting, JavaScript challenges, and adaptive QoS.
-
HTTP Tables
Extends Linux iptables/nftables for application-layer filtering, enabling rules that combine IP addresses with HTTP headers and content.
-
Intelligent Load Balancing
Machine learning-powered load balancing with persistent sessions, weighted round-robin, and rendezvous hashing strategies.
-
Web Acceleration
Built-in caching using Tempesta DB, an ultra-fast in-memory database with NUMA-aware distribution and SIMD optimizations.
-
High-Performance TLS
Tempesta TLS is 40-80% faster than Nginx/OpenSSL with 4x lower latency for TLS handshakes.
-
Bot Protection (WebShield)
Open-source automated bot protection via WebShield — detects and blocks DDoS bots, scrapers, shopping bots, and booking bots using TLS and HTTP fingerprint analysis on access logs stored in ClickHouse.
-
Volumetric DDoS Protection
Upcoming open-source volumetric DDoS protection solution, completing a full L3-L7 DDoS and bot mitigation stack when combined with Tempesta FW's application-layer defences and WebShield.
-
Native XDP Integration
Uses Linux XDP (eXpress Data Path) for early packet dropping, enabling efficient mitigation of volumetric attacks.
Which One Is Right for You?
The best WAF depends on your specific requirements, infrastructure, and team expertise.
Kong Gateway WAF
- You need: Organizations already using Kong as their API gateway, Kubernetes-native architectures needing gateway-level WAF, teams wanting unified API management and security in one platform, enterprises with microservices architectures routing all traffic through an API gateway
- You're using: Linux (Ubuntu, RHEL, Debian, Amazon Linux, Alpine), Docker, Kubernetes (via Ingress Controller and Operator), AWS, Azure, GCP, ARM64, macOS (dev)
Tempesta FW
- You need: High-traffic sites requiring maximum performance, organizations with Linux expertise, teams wanting to replace multiple infrastructure components, performance-critical applications
- You want to start with a free tier
- You prefer open-source solutions
- You're using: Linux (kernel-level integration), bare metal, cloud VMs
We recommend evaluating both options with a trial or free tier before committing. Consider your existing infrastructure, team expertise, compliance requirements, and budget.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is better for startups: Kong Gateway WAF or Tempesta FW?
Tempesta FW offers a free tier while Kong Gateway WAF does not, making Tempesta FW more accessible for budget-conscious startups. Kong Gateway WAF scores higher for ease of use (3.2/5), which is valuable for smaller teams. Consider your immediate security needs and growth plans when choosing.
Which has better support: Kong Gateway WAF or Tempesta FW?
Kong Gateway WAF has a higher support rating (4.2/5) compared to Tempesta FW (3.0/5). However, support quality can vary based on your plan tier - enterprise customers typically receive more responsive support from both providers. Consider evaluating support during a trial period.
Which is easier to implement: Kong Gateway WAF or Tempesta FW?
Kong Gateway WAF scores higher for ease of use (3.2/5) versus Tempesta FW (2.5/5). The actual implementation effort depends on your existing infrastructure and team expertise.
Which is more cost-effective: Kong Gateway WAF or Tempesta FW?
Tempesta FW offers a free tier while Kong Gateway WAF requires a paid plan. Tempesta FW scores higher for value (4.8/5). Total cost depends on your traffic volume, required features, and support level needs.
Which works better with AWS: Kong Gateway WAF or Tempesta FW?
Kong Gateway WAF explicitly supports AWS while Tempesta FW's AWS integration may vary. Consider whether native AWS integration or cross-cloud portability matters more for your use case.