WAFPlanet

Kong Gateway WAF vs Patchstack

Both Kong Gateway WAF and Patchstack are capable WAF solutions. The right choice depends on your specific infrastructure, budget, and feature requirements.

Overview

Kong Gateway WAF and Patchstack are both popular web application firewall solutions. This comparison will help you understand the key differences and choose the right one for your needs.

API gateway with built-in WAF plugin for enterprise customers. Kong is the most popular open source API gateway (35K+ GitHub stars, 312M+ downloads) built on NGINX, processing 400B+ API calls daily. The WAF plugin is an Enterprise-only add-on that protects API endpoints at the gateway layer.

WordPress-specific vulnerability mitigation platform with virtual patching (vPatching). Not a traditional WAF but deploys targeted mitigation rules for known WordPress vulnerabilities. Claims 74% more exploits blocked than leading WAFs. Number 1 WordPress vulnerability intelligence handler with 12K+ mitigation rules and 4.1K vulnerabilities disclosed in 2024. Free monitoring mode with no time limit.

Quick Comparison

Feature Kong Gateway WAF Patchstack
Overall Rating 3.8/5 4.2/5
Free Tier No Yes
Pricing Model Tiered (Plus per-gateway + Enterprise custom) Per site/month (billed annually)
Ease of Use 3.2/5 4.7/5
Value for Money 3.0/5 4.0/5
Support 4.2/5 4.0/5
Platforms Linux (Ubuntu, RHEL, Debian, Amazon Linux, Alpine), Docker, Kubernetes (via Ingress Controller and Operator), AWS, Azure, GCP, ARM64, macOS (dev) WordPress only. Compatible with any hosting environment that runs WordPress (shared hosting, VPS, dedicated servers, managed WordPress hosting, AWS, Azure, GCP).
Compliance SOC 2 Type II, FIPS 140-2 (Enterprise data planes), supports PCI DSS and HIPAA compliance PCI-DSS 4.0 compliance support for eCommerce sites

Pricing Comparison

Kong Gateway WAF

Model: Tiered (Plus per-gateway + Enterprise custom)

Kong Gateway OSS

Free

Kong Konnect Plus

From $225/mo

Kong Konnect Enterprise

Custom (annual)

Dedicated Cloud Gateway

$500/mo per control plane + $0.15/GB

View full pricing →

Patchstack

Model: Per site/month (billed annually)

Free Tier Available

Community (Free)

Free

Developer

$69/mo (billed annually)

Enterprise

Custom

Web Host

Custom

View full pricing →

Features Comparison

Kong Gateway WAF

  • Gateway-Embedded WAF

    WAF runs as a plugin inside the Kong Gateway process, inspecting API traffic at the same layer where routing, authentication, and rate limiting occur. No separate WAF appliance or additional proxy hop needed.

  • OWASP Top 10 Protection

    Built-in protection against common web application attacks including SQL injection, cross-site scripting, command injection, and path traversal at the API gateway layer.

  • Plugin Ecosystem

    Over 100 plugins for security, traffic control, authentication, and observability. WAF works alongside bot detection, IP restriction, CORS, ACL, and rate limiting plugins in a configurable execution chain.

  • Third-Party WAF Integrations

    Open plugin architecture supports third-party WAF engines including open-appsec (ML-driven detection) and Wallarm (API security). Teams can choose the WAF engine that fits their threat model.

  • Kubernetes-Native Deployment

    Kong Ingress Controller and Kong Kubernetes Operator provide native Kubernetes integration. WAF policies can be managed declaratively through Kubernetes CRDs alongside gateway configuration.

  • Hybrid Mode

    Cloud-managed control plane with self-hosted data planes. WAF policies are centrally managed and distributed to data planes running in any environment, including air-gapped networks.

  • AI Gateway

    Dedicated AI gateway capabilities including LLM proxy, token-based rate limiting, semantic caching, PII sanitization, prompt guardrails, and MCP server proxy. WAF protects AI endpoints alongside traditional APIs.

  • Declarative Configuration

    Gateway and WAF configuration can be managed as code through declarative YAML/JSON, enabling GitOps workflows and CI/CD pipeline integration for security policy changes.

  • Advanced Rate Limiting

    Enterprise-grade rate limiting with sliding window counters, consumer groups, and cluster-wide synchronization. Works in conjunction with WAF to prevent both application-layer attacks and abuse.

Patchstack

  • RapidMitigate (Virtual Patching)

    Automatically deploys targeted mitigation rules within hours of vulnerability disclosure. Rules block only the specific exploit vector, not broad traffic patterns. Claims 74% more exploits blocked compared to leading generic WAFs.

  • WordPress Vulnerability Database

    The largest WordPress vulnerability database in the world. 12,000+ active mitigation rules. 4,100+ vulnerabilities disclosed in 2024 alone. Operates as the

  • Patchstack Alliance Bug Bounty

    Bug bounty program that pays security researchers to discover vulnerabilities in popular WordPress plugins. Sources vulnerability intelligence from a global community of researchers, ensuring rapid discovery and disclosure.

  • Free Monitoring Mode

    The Community plan provides free vulnerability detection and monitoring with no time limit. See which plugins and themes have known vulnerabilities without deploying patches. Useful for awareness and audit.

  • PCI-DSS 4.0 Compliance

    Helps WordPress eCommerce sites meet PCI-DSS 4.0 requirement 6.4.2, which requires automated detection and prevention of web-based attacks. Virtual patching specifically addresses this requirement for known vulnerabilities.

  • Hardening Recommendations

    Provides security hardening recommendations specific to your WordPress installation. Identifies misconfigured settings, unnecessary file permissions, and security headers.

  • Plugin Priority Alerts

    Prioritized alerts based on vulnerability severity and the popularity of affected plugins. Focuses attention on the vulnerabilities most likely to be exploited in the wild.

  • Multi-site Management

    Dashboard for managing vulnerability status and virtual patches across multiple WordPress sites. Bulk actions and centralized reporting for agencies and hosting providers.

Which One Is Right for You?

The best WAF depends on your specific requirements, infrastructure, and team expertise.

Kong Gateway WAF

  • You need: Organizations already using Kong as their API gateway, Kubernetes-native architectures needing gateway-level WAF, teams wanting unified API management and security in one platform, enterprises with microservices architectures routing all traffic through an API gateway
  • You're using: Linux (Ubuntu, RHEL, Debian, Amazon Linux, Alpine), Docker, Kubernetes (via Ingress Controller and Operator), AWS, Azure, GCP, ARM64, macOS (dev)
Learn more →

Patchstack

  • You need: WordPress agencies and developers managing multiple sites. WooCommerce stores needing PCI-DSS 4.0 compliance. Managed WordPress hosting providers wanting to bundle vulnerability protection. Organizations where unpatched WordPress plugins are the primary security risk.
  • You want to start with a free tier
  • You're using: WordPress only. Compatible with any hosting environment that runs WordPress (shared hosting, VPS, dedicated servers, managed WordPress hosting, AWS, Azure, GCP).
Learn more →

We recommend evaluating both options with a trial or free tier before committing. Consider your existing infrastructure, team expertise, compliance requirements, and budget.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better for startups: Kong Gateway WAF or Patchstack?

Patchstack offers a free tier while Kong Gateway WAF does not, making Patchstack more accessible for budget-conscious startups. Patchstack scores higher for ease of use (4.7/5), which is valuable for smaller teams. Consider your immediate security needs and growth plans when choosing.

Which has better support: Kong Gateway WAF or Patchstack?

Kong Gateway WAF has a higher support rating (4.2/5) compared to Patchstack (4.0/5). However, support quality can vary based on your plan tier - enterprise customers typically receive more responsive support from both providers. Consider evaluating support during a trial period.

Which is easier to implement: Kong Gateway WAF or Patchstack?

Patchstack scores higher for ease of use (4.7/5) versus Kong Gateway WAF (3.2/5). The actual implementation effort depends on your existing infrastructure and team expertise.

Which is more cost-effective: Kong Gateway WAF or Patchstack?

Patchstack offers a free tier while Kong Gateway WAF requires a paid plan. Patchstack scores higher for value (4.0/5). Total cost depends on your traffic volume, required features, and support level needs.

Which works better with AWS: Kong Gateway WAF or Patchstack?

Both Kong Gateway WAF and Patchstack support AWS deployments. Consider whether native AWS integration or cross-cloud portability matters more for your use case.