WAFPlanet

Jetpack Protect / Jetpack WAF vs Reblaze (Link11) Web Security

Jetpack Protect / Jetpack WAF and Reblaze (Link11) Web Security take different approaches to web application security. Consider your team's expertise and infrastructure preferences when evaluating these options.

Jetpack Protect / Jetpack WAF and Reblaze (Link11) Web Security take fundamentally different approaches to web application security. Understanding your infrastructure and team capabilities will help determine which approach fits your needs.

Overview

Jetpack Protect / Jetpack WAF and Reblaze (Link11) Web Security are both popular web application firewall solutions. This comparison will help you understand the key differences and choose the right one for your needs.

WordPress security plugin by Automattic with built-in WAF, brute force protection, malware scanning, and downtime monitoring backed by WordPress.com infrastructure.

Cloud-native WAAP platform offering fully managed WAF, bot management, and DDoS protection with private cloud deployment options for enhanced data privacy.

Quick Comparison

Feature Jetpack Protect / Jetpack WAF Reblaze (Link11) Web Security
Overall Rating 4.0/5 4.1/5
Free Tier Yes No
Pricing Model Freemium (Free tier + paid subscriptions) Custom enterprise pricing
Ease of Use 4.6/5 4.0/5
Value for Money 3.8/5 3.6/5
Support 4.0/5 4.4/5
Open Source Yes No
Platforms WordPress (self-hosted) Any web application, AWS, Azure, GCP, private cloud
Compliance Contact vendor SOC 2, ISO 27001, GDPR, PCI DSS

Pricing Comparison

Jetpack Protect / Jetpack WAF

Model: Freemium (Free tier + paid subscriptions)

Free Tier Available

Free

$0

Security

$9.95/month (billed yearly)

Complete

$24.95/month (billed yearly)

View full pricing →

Reblaze (Link11) Web Security

Model: Custom enterprise pricing

Standard

Custom pricing

Enterprise

Custom pricing

View full pricing →

Features Comparison

Jetpack Protect / Jetpack WAF

  • Web Application Firewall

    Endpoint firewall with automatically updated rules based on WordPress.com threat intelligence.

  • Brute Force Protection

    Blocks distributed brute force login attacks using data from millions of WordPress.com sites.

  • Malware Scanning

    Automated scanning for malware, suspicious code, and known vulnerabilities in plugins and themes.

  • Real-Time Backups

    Cloud-based backups with every change saved, enabling one-click restore if your site is compromised.

  • Downtime Monitoring

    Monitors site availability and sends instant alerts when your site goes offline.

  • Activity Log

    Detailed log of all site changes, logins, and security events for auditing and troubleshooting.

Reblaze (Link11) Web Security

  • Private Cloud Deployment

    Dedicated virtual private cloud per customer eliminates multi-tenant security concerns and enhances data privacy.

  • Machine Learning Detection

    ML-powered traffic analysis automatically identifies and blocks malicious requests while allowing legitimate traffic.

  • Bot Management

    Advanced bot detection distinguishing between legitimate users, good bots (search engines), and malicious automation.

  • DDoS Protection

    Integrated Link11 DDoS mitigation with global scrubbing network for volumetric and application-layer attacks.

  • API Security

    Protection for REST and GraphQL APIs with schema validation and anomaly detection.

  • Managed SOC

    24/7 Security Operations Center monitoring with expert incident response and threat hunting.

Which One Is Right for You?

The best WAF depends on your specific requirements, infrastructure, and team expertise.

Jetpack Protect / Jetpack WAF

  • You need: WordPress site owners wanting an all-in-one solution from Automattic, sites already using Jetpack for other features, users who value simplicity and unified management
  • You want to start with a free tier
  • You prefer open-source solutions
  • You're using: WordPress (self-hosted)
Learn more →

Reblaze (Link11) Web Security

  • You need: European enterprises requiring data sovereignty, organizations wanting managed security services, privacy-conscious deployments
  • You're using: Any web application, AWS, Azure, GCP, private cloud
Learn more →

We recommend evaluating both options with a trial or free tier before committing. Consider your existing infrastructure, team expertise, compliance requirements, and budget.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better for startups: Jetpack Protect / Jetpack WAF or Reblaze (Link11) Web Security?

Jetpack Protect / Jetpack WAF offers a free tier while Reblaze (Link11) Web Security does not, which may be important for early-stage startups. Jetpack Protect / Jetpack WAF scores higher for ease of use (4.6/5), which is valuable for smaller teams. Consider your immediate security needs and growth plans when choosing.

Which has better support: Jetpack Protect / Jetpack WAF or Reblaze (Link11) Web Security?

Reblaze (Link11) Web Security has a higher support rating (4.4/5) compared to Jetpack Protect / Jetpack WAF (4.0/5). However, support quality can vary based on your plan tier - enterprise customers typically receive more responsive support from both providers. Consider evaluating support during a trial period.

Which is easier to implement: Jetpack Protect / Jetpack WAF or Reblaze (Link11) Web Security?

Jetpack Protect / Jetpack WAF scores higher for ease of use (4.6/5) versus Reblaze (Link11) Web Security (4.0/5). The actual implementation effort depends on your existing infrastructure and team expertise.

Which is more cost-effective: Jetpack Protect / Jetpack WAF or Reblaze (Link11) Web Security?

Jetpack Protect / Jetpack WAF offers a free tier while Reblaze (Link11) Web Security requires a paid plan. Jetpack Protect / Jetpack WAF scores higher for value (3.8/5). Total cost depends on your traffic volume, required features, and support level needs.

Which works better with AWS: Jetpack Protect / Jetpack WAF or Reblaze (Link11) Web Security?

Reblaze (Link11) Web Security explicitly supports AWS while Jetpack Protect / Jetpack WAF's AWS integration may vary. Consider whether native AWS integration or cross-cloud portability matters more for your use case.