Invicti vs UBIKA WAAP
Both Invicti and UBIKA WAAP are capable WAF solutions. The right choice depends on your specific infrastructure, budget, and feature requirements.
Overview
Invicti and UBIKA WAAP are both popular web application firewall solutions. This comparison will help you understand the key differences and choose the right one for your needs.
Application security testing platform offering DAST and IAST scanning. Formerly Netsparker. Products include Invicti (enterprise DAST) and Acunetix (SMB DAST). Not a WAF, but a vulnerability scanner that finds the vulnerabilities WAFs protect against. OWASP Gold sponsor. Proof-based scanning reduces false positives. Custom enterprise pricing.
European sovereign WAF offering comprehensive application and API protection with EU data residency guarantees and flexible SaaS or cloud deployment options.
Quick Comparison
| Feature | Invicti | UBIKA WAAP |
|---|---|---|
| Overall Rating | 3.8/5 | 4.0/5 |
| Free Tier | No | No |
| Pricing Model | Custom (enterprise, annual contract) | Subscription / Pay-as-you-go |
| Ease of Use | 3.5/5 | 3.7/5 |
| Value for Money | 3.3/5 | 4.0/5 |
| Support | 4.0/5 | 4.1/5 |
| Platforms | Scans any web application accessible via HTTP/HTTPS. Supports REST APIs, GraphQL, SOAP, single-page applications (React, Angular, Vue), and traditional server-rendered applications. On-premises scanner available for internal applications. | Any web application, AWS, Azure, on-premises, hybrid cloud |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type 2, helps with PCI DSS, HIPAA, ISO 27001, GDPR compliance scanning | ISO 27001, HDS (Health Data Hosting), SecNumCloud, GDPR, PCI DSS |
Pricing Comparison
Invicti
Model: Custom (enterprise, annual contract)
Acunetix (SMB)
Custom (starts ~$4,500/year)
Invicti (Enterprise)
Custom (annual contract)
UBIKA WAAP
Model: Subscription / Pay-as-you-go
Cloud Protector SaaS
Subscription-based
WAAP Cloud
Pay-as-you-go / BYOL
Enterprise
Custom pricing
Features Comparison
Invicti
-
Proof-Based Scanning
When a vulnerability is found, Invicti attempts to safely exploit it and provides concrete proof. For SQL injection, it extracts actual data. For file inclusion, it reads a specific file. This eliminates the false positive problem that plagues most security scanners.
-
DAST (Dynamic Application Security Testing)
Tests running web applications by sending crafted HTTP requests and analyzing responses. Finds SQL injection, XSS, CSRF, file inclusion, authentication flaws, and other OWASP Top 10 vulnerabilities in production or staging environments.
-
IAST (Interactive Application Security Testing)
Instruments the application at runtime to provide deeper vulnerability detection. Combines external scanning with internal application visibility. Finds vulnerabilities that pure DAST scanning might miss, such as insecure deserialization or business logic flaws.
-
API Security Testing
Scans REST APIs, GraphQL endpoints, and SOAP services. Imports API definitions (OpenAPI/Swagger, WSDL, GraphQL schemas) and tests all endpoints for vulnerabilities. Critical for modern applications where APIs are the primary attack surface.
-
CI/CD Pipeline Integration
Integrates with Jenkins, Azure DevOps, GitHub Actions, GitLab CI, and other CI/CD platforms. Automatically scans applications as part of the deployment pipeline. Fails builds if critical vulnerabilities are found.
-
WAF Rule Export
Exports discovered vulnerabilities as WAF rules that can be imported into WAF products. Creates targeted virtual patches for specific vulnerabilities found during scanning. Bridges the gap between vulnerability discovery and runtime mitigation.
-
Compliance Reporting
Generates compliance reports mapped to PCI DSS, HIPAA, ISO 27001, and OWASP Top 10 requirements. Useful for demonstrating due diligence during audits and regulatory reviews.
-
Single-Page Application Support
Full support for scanning modern JavaScript applications built with React, Angular, or Vue. Invicti executes JavaScript, interacts with dynamic page elements, and discovers application states that traditional crawlers miss.
UBIKA WAAP
-
EU Data Sovereignty
Hosted in OVHcloud European data centers, not subject to US Cloud Act or other extraterritorial laws.
-
Workflow Technology
Unique visual workflow design for security policies allows tailoring protection to specific application requirements.
-
API Protection
Advanced API security with JWT/OAuth support, JSON/XML filtering, and OpenAPI schema validation.
-
DDoS Protection
Network and application-layer DDoS mitigation with global caching and acceleration.
-
DevOps Integration
Infrastructure-as-Code support with REST API and gRPC (Appsecctl) for CI/CD pipeline integration.
-
Managed Security Services
Optional MSS with proactive monitoring, false positive management, and monthly security reporting.
Which One Is Right for You?
The best WAF depends on your specific requirements, infrastructure, and team expertise.
Invicti
- You need: Enterprise security teams evaluating WAF effectiveness against actual application vulnerabilities. DevSecOps teams wanting automated vulnerability scanning in CI/CD pipelines. Organizations needing compliance scanning for PCI DSS, HIPAA, or ISO 27001. Security consultants performing application security assessments.
- You're using: Scans any web application accessible via HTTP/HTTPS. Supports REST APIs, GraphQL, SOAP, single-page applications (React, Angular, Vue), and traditional server-rendered applications. On-premises scanner available for internal applications.
UBIKA WAAP
- You need: European enterprises, regulated industries (healthcare, finance), organizations requiring EU data residency, French public sector
- You're using: Any web application, AWS, Azure, on-premises, hybrid cloud
We recommend evaluating both options with a trial or free tier before committing. Consider your existing infrastructure, team expertise, compliance requirements, and budget.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which has better support: Invicti or UBIKA WAAP?
UBIKA WAAP has a higher support rating (4.1/5) compared to Invicti (4.0/5). However, support quality can vary based on your plan tier - enterprise customers typically receive more responsive support from both providers. Consider evaluating support during a trial period.
Which is easier to implement: Invicti or UBIKA WAAP?
UBIKA WAAP scores higher for ease of use (3.7/5) versus Invicti (3.5/5). The actual implementation effort depends on your existing infrastructure and team expertise.
Which is more cost-effective: Invicti or UBIKA WAAP?
Neither provider offers a completely free tier. UBIKA WAAP scores higher for value (4.0/5). Total cost depends on your traffic volume, required features, and support level needs.
Which works better with AWS: Invicti or UBIKA WAAP?
UBIKA WAAP explicitly supports AWS while Invicti's AWS integration may vary. Consider whether native AWS integration or cross-cloud portability matters more for your use case.
Which is better for enterprise: Invicti or UBIKA WAAP?
Both Invicti and UBIKA WAAP are well-suited for enterprise deployments. Both offer compliance certifications important for enterprise. Enterprise buyers should evaluate SLAs, support options, and integration capabilities.