Invicti vs Patchstack
Invicti and Patchstack take different approaches to web application security. Consider your team's expertise and infrastructure preferences when evaluating these options.
Invicti and Patchstack take fundamentally different approaches to web application security. Understanding your infrastructure and team capabilities will help determine which approach fits your needs.
Overview
Invicti and Patchstack are both popular web application firewall solutions. This comparison will help you understand the key differences and choose the right one for your needs.
Application security testing platform offering DAST and IAST scanning. Formerly Netsparker. Products include Invicti (enterprise DAST) and Acunetix (SMB DAST). Not a WAF, but a vulnerability scanner that finds the vulnerabilities WAFs protect against. OWASP Gold sponsor. Proof-based scanning reduces false positives. Custom enterprise pricing.
WordPress-specific vulnerability mitigation platform with virtual patching (vPatching). Not a traditional WAF but deploys targeted mitigation rules for known WordPress vulnerabilities. Claims 74% more exploits blocked than leading WAFs. Number 1 WordPress vulnerability intelligence handler with 12K+ mitigation rules and 4.1K vulnerabilities disclosed in 2024. Free monitoring mode with no time limit.
Quick Comparison
| Feature | Invicti | Patchstack |
|---|---|---|
| Overall Rating | 3.8/5 | 4.2/5 |
| Free Tier | No | Yes |
| Pricing Model | Custom (enterprise, annual contract) | Per site/month (billed annually) |
| Ease of Use | 3.5/5 | 4.7/5 |
| Value for Money | 3.3/5 | 4.0/5 |
| Support | 4.0/5 | 4.0/5 |
| Platforms | Scans any web application accessible via HTTP/HTTPS. Supports REST APIs, GraphQL, SOAP, single-page applications (React, Angular, Vue), and traditional server-rendered applications. On-premises scanner available for internal applications. | WordPress only. Compatible with any hosting environment that runs WordPress (shared hosting, VPS, dedicated servers, managed WordPress hosting, AWS, Azure, GCP). |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type 2, helps with PCI DSS, HIPAA, ISO 27001, GDPR compliance scanning | PCI-DSS 4.0 compliance support for eCommerce sites |
Pricing Comparison
Invicti
Model: Custom (enterprise, annual contract)
Acunetix (SMB)
Custom (starts ~$4,500/year)
Invicti (Enterprise)
Custom (annual contract)
Patchstack
Model: Per site/month (billed annually)
Free Tier AvailableCommunity (Free)
Free
Developer
$69/mo (billed annually)
Enterprise
Custom
Web Host
Custom
Features Comparison
Invicti
-
Proof-Based Scanning
When a vulnerability is found, Invicti attempts to safely exploit it and provides concrete proof. For SQL injection, it extracts actual data. For file inclusion, it reads a specific file. This eliminates the false positive problem that plagues most security scanners.
-
DAST (Dynamic Application Security Testing)
Tests running web applications by sending crafted HTTP requests and analyzing responses. Finds SQL injection, XSS, CSRF, file inclusion, authentication flaws, and other OWASP Top 10 vulnerabilities in production or staging environments.
-
IAST (Interactive Application Security Testing)
Instruments the application at runtime to provide deeper vulnerability detection. Combines external scanning with internal application visibility. Finds vulnerabilities that pure DAST scanning might miss, such as insecure deserialization or business logic flaws.
-
API Security Testing
Scans REST APIs, GraphQL endpoints, and SOAP services. Imports API definitions (OpenAPI/Swagger, WSDL, GraphQL schemas) and tests all endpoints for vulnerabilities. Critical for modern applications where APIs are the primary attack surface.
-
CI/CD Pipeline Integration
Integrates with Jenkins, Azure DevOps, GitHub Actions, GitLab CI, and other CI/CD platforms. Automatically scans applications as part of the deployment pipeline. Fails builds if critical vulnerabilities are found.
-
WAF Rule Export
Exports discovered vulnerabilities as WAF rules that can be imported into WAF products. Creates targeted virtual patches for specific vulnerabilities found during scanning. Bridges the gap between vulnerability discovery and runtime mitigation.
-
Compliance Reporting
Generates compliance reports mapped to PCI DSS, HIPAA, ISO 27001, and OWASP Top 10 requirements. Useful for demonstrating due diligence during audits and regulatory reviews.
-
Single-Page Application Support
Full support for scanning modern JavaScript applications built with React, Angular, or Vue. Invicti executes JavaScript, interacts with dynamic page elements, and discovers application states that traditional crawlers miss.
Patchstack
-
RapidMitigate (Virtual Patching)
Automatically deploys targeted mitigation rules within hours of vulnerability disclosure. Rules block only the specific exploit vector, not broad traffic patterns. Claims 74% more exploits blocked compared to leading generic WAFs.
-
WordPress Vulnerability Database
The largest WordPress vulnerability database in the world. 12,000+ active mitigation rules. 4,100+ vulnerabilities disclosed in 2024 alone. Operates as the
-
Patchstack Alliance Bug Bounty
Bug bounty program that pays security researchers to discover vulnerabilities in popular WordPress plugins. Sources vulnerability intelligence from a global community of researchers, ensuring rapid discovery and disclosure.
-
Free Monitoring Mode
The Community plan provides free vulnerability detection and monitoring with no time limit. See which plugins and themes have known vulnerabilities without deploying patches. Useful for awareness and audit.
-
PCI-DSS 4.0 Compliance
Helps WordPress eCommerce sites meet PCI-DSS 4.0 requirement 6.4.2, which requires automated detection and prevention of web-based attacks. Virtual patching specifically addresses this requirement for known vulnerabilities.
-
Hardening Recommendations
Provides security hardening recommendations specific to your WordPress installation. Identifies misconfigured settings, unnecessary file permissions, and security headers.
-
Plugin Priority Alerts
Prioritized alerts based on vulnerability severity and the popularity of affected plugins. Focuses attention on the vulnerabilities most likely to be exploited in the wild.
-
Multi-site Management
Dashboard for managing vulnerability status and virtual patches across multiple WordPress sites. Bulk actions and centralized reporting for agencies and hosting providers.
Which One Is Right for You?
The best WAF depends on your specific requirements, infrastructure, and team expertise.
Invicti
- You need: Enterprise security teams evaluating WAF effectiveness against actual application vulnerabilities. DevSecOps teams wanting automated vulnerability scanning in CI/CD pipelines. Organizations needing compliance scanning for PCI DSS, HIPAA, or ISO 27001. Security consultants performing application security assessments.
- You're using: Scans any web application accessible via HTTP/HTTPS. Supports REST APIs, GraphQL, SOAP, single-page applications (React, Angular, Vue), and traditional server-rendered applications. On-premises scanner available for internal applications.
Patchstack
- You need: WordPress agencies and developers managing multiple sites. WooCommerce stores needing PCI-DSS 4.0 compliance. Managed WordPress hosting providers wanting to bundle vulnerability protection. Organizations where unpatched WordPress plugins are the primary security risk.
- You want to start with a free tier
- You're using: WordPress only. Compatible with any hosting environment that runs WordPress (shared hosting, VPS, dedicated servers, managed WordPress hosting, AWS, Azure, GCP).
We recommend evaluating both options with a trial or free tier before committing. Consider your existing infrastructure, team expertise, compliance requirements, and budget.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is better for startups: Invicti or Patchstack?
Patchstack offers a free tier while Invicti does not, making Patchstack more accessible for budget-conscious startups. Patchstack scores higher for ease of use (4.7/5), which is valuable for smaller teams. Consider your immediate security needs and growth plans when choosing.
Which has better support: Invicti or Patchstack?
Patchstack has a higher support rating (4.0/5) compared to Invicti (4.0/5). However, support quality can vary based on your plan tier - enterprise customers typically receive more responsive support from both providers. Consider evaluating support during a trial period.
Which is easier to implement: Invicti or Patchstack?
Patchstack scores higher for ease of use (4.7/5) versus Invicti (3.5/5). The actual implementation effort depends on your existing infrastructure and team expertise.
Which is more cost-effective: Invicti or Patchstack?
Patchstack offers a free tier while Invicti requires a paid plan. Patchstack scores higher for value (4.0/5). Total cost depends on your traffic volume, required features, and support level needs.
Which works better with AWS: Invicti or Patchstack?
Patchstack explicitly supports AWS while Invicti's AWS integration may vary. Consider whether native AWS integration or cross-cloud portability matters more for your use case.