WAFPlanet

Invicti vs NinjaFirewall (WP Edition)

Both Invicti and NinjaFirewall (WP Edition) are capable WAF solutions. The right choice depends on your specific infrastructure, budget, and feature requirements.

Overview

Invicti and NinjaFirewall (WP Edition) are both popular web application firewall solutions. This comparison will help you understand the key differences and choose the right one for your needs.

Application security testing platform offering DAST and IAST scanning. Formerly Netsparker. Products include Invicti (enterprise DAST) and Acunetix (SMB DAST). Not a WAF, but a vulnerability scanner that finds the vulnerabilities WAFs protect against. OWASP Gold sponsor. Proof-based scanning reduces false positives. Custom enterprise pricing.

PHP-based WordPress firewall that hooks into WordPress before core loads, providing stand-alone WAF protection with file integrity monitoring and real-time detection without cloud dependency.

Quick Comparison

Feature Invicti NinjaFirewall (WP Edition)
Overall Rating 3.8/5 4.3/5
Free Tier No Yes
Pricing Model Custom (enterprise, annual contract) Free edition + annual license for premium
Ease of Use 3.5/5 4.0/5
Value for Money 3.3/5 4.8/5
Support 4.0/5 4.0/5
Platforms Scans any web application accessible via HTTP/HTTPS. Supports REST APIs, GraphQL, SOAP, single-page applications (React, Angular, Vue), and traditional server-rendered applications. On-premises scanner available for internal applications. WordPress (self-hosted)
Compliance SOC 2 Type 2, helps with PCI DSS, HIPAA, ISO 27001, GDPR compliance scanning Contact vendor

Pricing Comparison

Invicti

Model: Custom (enterprise, annual contract)

Acunetix (SMB)

Custom (starts ~$4,500/year)

Invicti (Enterprise)

Custom (annual contract)

View full pricing →

NinjaFirewall (WP Edition)

Model: Free edition + annual license for premium

Free Tier Available

WP Edition (Free)

Free

WP+ Edition (1 site)

$34.90/year

WP+ Edition (multi-site)

From $59.90/year

View full pricing →

Features Comparison

Invicti

  • Proof-Based Scanning

    When a vulnerability is found, Invicti attempts to safely exploit it and provides concrete proof. For SQL injection, it extracts actual data. For file inclusion, it reads a specific file. This eliminates the false positive problem that plagues most security scanners.

  • DAST (Dynamic Application Security Testing)

    Tests running web applications by sending crafted HTTP requests and analyzing responses. Finds SQL injection, XSS, CSRF, file inclusion, authentication flaws, and other OWASP Top 10 vulnerabilities in production or staging environments.

  • IAST (Interactive Application Security Testing)

    Instruments the application at runtime to provide deeper vulnerability detection. Combines external scanning with internal application visibility. Finds vulnerabilities that pure DAST scanning might miss, such as insecure deserialization or business logic flaws.

  • API Security Testing

    Scans REST APIs, GraphQL endpoints, and SOAP services. Imports API definitions (OpenAPI/Swagger, WSDL, GraphQL schemas) and tests all endpoints for vulnerabilities. Critical for modern applications where APIs are the primary attack surface.

  • CI/CD Pipeline Integration

    Integrates with Jenkins, Azure DevOps, GitHub Actions, GitLab CI, and other CI/CD platforms. Automatically scans applications as part of the deployment pipeline. Fails builds if critical vulnerabilities are found.

  • WAF Rule Export

    Exports discovered vulnerabilities as WAF rules that can be imported into WAF products. Creates targeted virtual patches for specific vulnerabilities found during scanning. Bridges the gap between vulnerability discovery and runtime mitigation.

  • Compliance Reporting

    Generates compliance reports mapped to PCI DSS, HIPAA, ISO 27001, and OWASP Top 10 requirements. Useful for demonstrating due diligence during audits and regulatory reviews.

  • Single-Page Application Support

    Full support for scanning modern JavaScript applications built with React, Angular, or Vue. Invicti executes JavaScript, interacts with dynamic page elements, and discovers application states that traditional crawlers miss.

NinjaFirewall (WP Edition)

  • Pre-WordPress Filtering

    Hooks into PHP before WordPress core loads, filtering malicious requests before they reach any WordPress code.

  • File Integrity Monitoring

    Detect unauthorized file changes with scheduled or real-time monitoring of WordPress core, plugins, and themes.

  • Brute Force Protection

    Rate-limit and block brute force attacks against wp-login.php and xmlrpc.php with configurable thresholds.

  • Real-Time Detection

    Immediate alerts for suspicious activity including file modifications, PHP shell uploads, and admin account changes.

  • Event Notifications

    Email alerts for security events including plugin/theme installations, user account changes, and PHP errors.

  • Live Log

    Real-time log viewer showing all HTTP/HTTPS requests processed by the firewall with detailed request data.

Which One Is Right for You?

The best WAF depends on your specific requirements, infrastructure, and team expertise.

Invicti

  • You need: Enterprise security teams evaluating WAF effectiveness against actual application vulnerabilities. DevSecOps teams wanting automated vulnerability scanning in CI/CD pipelines. Organizations needing compliance scanning for PCI DSS, HIPAA, or ISO 27001. Security consultants performing application security assessments.
  • You're using: Scans any web application accessible via HTTP/HTTPS. Supports REST APIs, GraphQL, SOAP, single-page applications (React, Angular, Vue), and traditional server-rendered applications. On-premises scanner available for internal applications.
Learn more →

NinjaFirewall (WP Edition)

  • You need: WordPress site owners wanting affordable server-level WAF protection, developers preferring local security without cloud dependencies
  • You want to start with a free tier
  • You're using: WordPress (self-hosted)
Learn more →

We recommend evaluating both options with a trial or free tier before committing. Consider your existing infrastructure, team expertise, compliance requirements, and budget.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better for startups: Invicti or NinjaFirewall (WP Edition)?

NinjaFirewall (WP Edition) offers a free tier while Invicti does not, making NinjaFirewall (WP Edition) more accessible for budget-conscious startups. NinjaFirewall (WP Edition) scores higher for ease of use (4.0/5), which is valuable for smaller teams. Consider your immediate security needs and growth plans when choosing.

Which has better support: Invicti or NinjaFirewall (WP Edition)?

NinjaFirewall (WP Edition) has a higher support rating (4.0/5) compared to Invicti (4.0/5). However, support quality can vary based on your plan tier - enterprise customers typically receive more responsive support from both providers. Consider evaluating support during a trial period.

Which is easier to implement: Invicti or NinjaFirewall (WP Edition)?

NinjaFirewall (WP Edition) scores higher for ease of use (4.0/5) versus Invicti (3.5/5). The actual implementation effort depends on your existing infrastructure and team expertise.

Which is more cost-effective: Invicti or NinjaFirewall (WP Edition)?

NinjaFirewall (WP Edition) offers a free tier while Invicti requires a paid plan. NinjaFirewall (WP Edition) scores higher for value (4.8/5). Total cost depends on your traffic volume, required features, and support level needs.

Which is better for WordPress: Invicti or NinjaFirewall (WP Edition)?

NinjaFirewall (WP Edition) explicitly supports WordPress while Invicti takes a more platform-agnostic approach. For WordPress-specific threats like plugin vulnerabilities and brute force attacks, look for providers with WordPress-specific rule sets.