Imperva Web Application Firewall vs StackPath Web Application Firewall
Both Imperva Web Application Firewall and StackPath Web Application Firewall are capable WAF solutions. The right choice depends on your specific infrastructure, budget, and feature requirements.
Overview
Imperva Web Application Firewall and StackPath Web Application Firewall are both popular web application firewall solutions. This comparison will help you understand the key differences and choose the right one for your needs.
Enterprise-grade cloud WAF with industry-leading threat research, offering comprehensive application security with advanced bot protection and API security.
Edge-based WAF that was part of StackPath's CDN and edge computing platform. Discontinued in June 2024 when the company shut down operations.
Quick Comparison
| Feature | Imperva Web Application Firewall | StackPath Web Application Firewall |
|---|---|---|
| Overall Rating | 4.4/5 | 1.0/5 |
| Free Tier | No | No |
| Pricing Model | Custom enterprise pricing | Per site / Per bandwidth tier (discontinued) |
| Ease of Use | 3.5/5 | 1.0/5 |
| Value for Money | 3.7/5 | 1.0/5 |
| Support | 4.5/5 | 1.0/5 |
| Platforms | Any web application, AWS, Azure, GCP, Kubernetes, on-premise | Cloud (SaaS, discontinued) |
| Compliance | SOC 2, PCI DSS, HIPAA, ISO 27001, ISO 27017, ISO 27018 | SOC 2, PCI DSS (historical) |
Pricing Comparison
Imperva Web Application Firewall
Model: Custom enterprise pricing
Pro
Starting ~$59/month
Business
Starting ~$299/month
Enterprise
Custom pricing
StackPath Web Application Firewall
Model: Per site / Per bandwidth tier (discontinued)
Edge Delivery 200
$27.50/month
Edge Delivery 2000
$275/month
Features Comparison
Imperva Web Application Firewall
-
Advanced Bot Protection
Machine learning-powered bot detection that distinguishes between legitimate users, good bots, and malicious automation.
-
API Security
Discover, classify, and protect APIs with schema validation, anomaly detection, and positive security model.
-
Account Takeover Protection
Detect and prevent credential stuffing and account takeover attacks using behavioral analysis.
-
Client-Side Protection
Monitor and protect against client-side attacks like Magecart, formjacking, and supply chain compromises.
-
Attack Analytics
AI-powered analysis of security events to identify attack campaigns and reduce alert fatigue.
-
Virtual Patching
Immediate protection against known vulnerabilities while you work on permanent fixes.
StackPath Web Application Firewall
-
Edge WAF
Application-layer firewall deployed at the edge, filtering traffic before it reached origin servers. Included OWASP Top 10 coverage and custom rule support.
-
DDoS Protection
Volumetric and application-layer DDoS mitigation integrated with the CDN edge network.
-
Bot Management
Bot detection and mitigation using behavioral analysis and challenge-based verification.
-
Real-time Analytics
Dashboard showing traffic patterns, blocked requests, and attack trends across protected sites.
Which One Is Right for You?
The best WAF depends on your specific requirements, infrastructure, and team expertise.
Imperva Web Application Firewall
- You need: Large enterprises, organizations with sophisticated security requirements, companies needing advanced bot management, regulated industries
- You're using: Any web application, AWS, Azure, GCP, Kubernetes, on-premise
StackPath Web Application Firewall
- You need: Historical reference only. StackPath is no longer available.
- You're using: Cloud (SaaS, discontinued)
We recommend evaluating both options with a trial or free tier before committing. Consider your existing infrastructure, team expertise, compliance requirements, and budget.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which has better support: Imperva Web Application Firewall or StackPath Web Application Firewall?
Imperva Web Application Firewall has a higher support rating (4.5/5) compared to StackPath Web Application Firewall (1.0/5). However, support quality can vary based on your plan tier - enterprise customers typically receive more responsive support from both providers. Consider evaluating support during a trial period.
Which is easier to implement: Imperva Web Application Firewall or StackPath Web Application Firewall?
Imperva Web Application Firewall scores higher for ease of use (3.5/5) versus StackPath Web Application Firewall (1.0/5). The actual implementation effort depends on your existing infrastructure and team expertise.
Which is more cost-effective: Imperva Web Application Firewall or StackPath Web Application Firewall?
Neither provider offers a completely free tier. Imperva Web Application Firewall scores higher for value (3.7/5). Total cost depends on your traffic volume, required features, and support level needs.
Which works better with AWS: Imperva Web Application Firewall or StackPath Web Application Firewall?
Imperva Web Application Firewall explicitly supports AWS while StackPath Web Application Firewall's AWS integration may vary. Consider whether native AWS integration or cross-cloud portability matters more for your use case.
Which is better for enterprise: Imperva Web Application Firewall or StackPath Web Application Firewall?
Imperva Web Application Firewall is positioned for enterprise use cases, while StackPath Web Application Firewall may be more suited for small to mid-market organizations. Both offer compliance certifications important for enterprise. Enterprise buyers should evaluate SLAs, support options, and integration capabilities.