WAFPlanet

Google Cloud Armor vs StackPath Web Application Firewall

Both Google Cloud Armor and StackPath Web Application Firewall are capable WAF solutions. The right choice depends on your specific infrastructure, budget, and feature requirements.

Overview

Google Cloud Armor and StackPath Web Application Firewall are both popular web application firewall solutions. This comparison will help you understand the key differences and choose the right one for your needs.

Google Cloud's edge security service combining WAF, DDoS protection, and adaptive protection with the scale and intelligence of Google's global network.

Edge-based WAF that was part of StackPath's CDN and edge computing platform. Discontinued in June 2024 when the company shut down operations.

Quick Comparison

Feature Google Cloud Armor StackPath Web Application Firewall
Overall Rating 4.2/5 1.0/5
Free Tier No No
Pricing Model Pay-per-use (policies + rules + requests) Per site / Per bandwidth tier (discontinued)
Ease of Use 3.8/5 1.0/5
Value for Money 4.0/5 1.0/5
Support 4.0/5 1.0/5
Platforms Google Cloud Load Balancer (HTTP/S, TCP/SSL Proxy), Cloud CDN, Cloud Run, GKE Cloud (SaaS, discontinued)
Compliance SOC 1/2/3, PCI DSS, ISO 27001, ISO 27017, ISO 27018, FedRAMP, HIPAA SOC 2, PCI DSS (historical)

Pricing Comparison

Google Cloud Armor

Model: Pay-per-use (policies + rules + requests)

Standard (Small)

~$20/mo + $0.75/M requests

Standard (Medium)

~$55/mo + $0.75/M requests

Plus (Managed Protection)

$3,000/month

Enterprise

Custom pricing

View full pricing →

StackPath Web Application Firewall

Model: Per site / Per bandwidth tier (discontinued)

Edge Delivery 200

$27.50/month

Edge Delivery 2000

$275/month

View full pricing →

Features Comparison

Google Cloud Armor

  • Pre-configured WAF Rules

    Ready-to-use rule sets for OWASP Top 10, SQLi, XSS, and other common attacks.

  • Adaptive Protection

    ML-powered automatic detection and mitigation of sophisticated L7 DDoS attacks.

  • Bot Management

    Integration with reCAPTCHA Enterprise for advanced bot detection and challenge pages.

  • Rate Limiting

    Flexible rate limiting based on IP, headers, or other request attributes.

  • Geo-Based Access Control

    Allow or deny traffic based on geographic location of the request origin.

  • Named IP Lists

    Block known malicious IPs using Google's threat intelligence or custom lists.

StackPath Web Application Firewall

  • Edge WAF

    Application-layer firewall deployed at the edge, filtering traffic before it reached origin servers. Included OWASP Top 10 coverage and custom rule support.

  • DDoS Protection

    Volumetric and application-layer DDoS mitigation integrated with the CDN edge network.

  • Bot Management

    Bot detection and mitigation using behavioral analysis and challenge-based verification.

  • Real-time Analytics

    Dashboard showing traffic patterns, blocked requests, and attack trends across protected sites.

Which One Is Right for You?

The best WAF depends on your specific requirements, infrastructure, and team expertise.

Google Cloud Armor

  • You need: GCP-native applications, organizations using Google Cloud, applications needing reCAPTCHA integration, multi-cloud with GCP component
  • You're using: Google Cloud Load Balancer (HTTP/S, TCP/SSL Proxy), Cloud CDN, Cloud Run, GKE
Learn more →

StackPath Web Application Firewall

  • You need: Historical reference only. StackPath is no longer available.
  • You're using: Cloud (SaaS, discontinued)
Learn more →

We recommend evaluating both options with a trial or free tier before committing. Consider your existing infrastructure, team expertise, compliance requirements, and budget.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which has better support: Google Cloud Armor or StackPath Web Application Firewall?

Google Cloud Armor has a higher support rating (4.0/5) compared to StackPath Web Application Firewall (1.0/5). However, support quality can vary based on your plan tier - enterprise customers typically receive more responsive support from both providers. Consider evaluating support during a trial period.

Which is easier to implement: Google Cloud Armor or StackPath Web Application Firewall?

Google Cloud Armor scores higher for ease of use (3.8/5) versus StackPath Web Application Firewall (1.0/5). The actual implementation effort depends on your existing infrastructure and team expertise.

Which is more cost-effective: Google Cloud Armor or StackPath Web Application Firewall?

Neither provider offers a completely free tier. Google Cloud Armor scores higher for value (4.0/5). Total cost depends on your traffic volume, required features, and support level needs.