WAFPlanet

CrowdSec Web Application Firewall vs Kong Gateway WAF

Both CrowdSec Web Application Firewall and Kong Gateway WAF are capable WAF solutions. The right choice depends on your specific infrastructure, budget, and feature requirements.

Overview

CrowdSec Web Application Firewall and Kong Gateway WAF are both popular web application firewall solutions. This comparison will help you understand the key differences and choose the right one for your needs.

Open-source, crowd-powered WAF that combines traditional rule-based filtering with community-driven threat intelligence. Integrates with Nginx, Traefik, HAProxy, and Kubernetes. Compatible with ModSecurity SecLang rules.

API gateway with built-in WAF plugin for enterprise customers. Kong is the most popular open source API gateway (35K+ GitHub stars, 312M+ downloads) built on NGINX, processing 400B+ API calls daily. The WAF plugin is an Enterprise-only add-on that protects API endpoints at the gateway layer.

Quick Comparison

Feature CrowdSec Web Application Firewall Kong Gateway WAF
Overall Rating 4.3/5 3.8/5
Free Tier Yes No
Pricing Model Open source (MIT) + commercial blocklists and CTI Tiered (Plus per-gateway + Enterprise custom)
Ease of Use - 3.2/5
Value for Money 4.7/5 3.0/5
Support - 4.2/5
Platforms Linux, Docker, Kubernetes, FreeBSD, Windows (beta) Linux (Ubuntu, RHEL, Debian, Amazon Linux, Alpine), Docker, Kubernetes (via Ingress Controller and Operator), AWS, Azure, GCP, ARM64, macOS (dev)
Compliance Supports PCI DSS compliance, SOC 2 workflows SOC 2 Type II, FIPS 140-2 (Enterprise data planes), supports PCI DSS and HIPAA compliance

Pricing Comparison

CrowdSec Web Application Firewall

Model: Open source (MIT) + commercial blocklists and CTI

Free Tier Available

Community

Free

Premium Blocklists

From $900/month

CTI

Custom

View full pricing →

Kong Gateway WAF

Model: Tiered (Plus per-gateway + Enterprise custom)

Kong Gateway OSS

Free

Kong Konnect Plus

From $225/mo

Kong Konnect Enterprise

Custom (annual)

Dedicated Cloud Gateway

$500/mo per control plane + $0.15/GB

View full pricing →

Features Comparison

CrowdSec Web Application Firewall

  • Crowd-Sourced Threat Intelligence

    Network of 200,000+ installations sharing attack signals in real-time. Blocks malicious IPs 7-60 days before other vendors detect them.

  • ModSecurity Rule Compatibility

    Load existing ModSecurity SecLang rules directly. Teams migrating from ModSecurity can reuse their rule sets without rewriting.

  • Virtual Patching

    Block exploitation attempts at the WAF layer before application patches are deployed. Protect against known CVEs without code changes.

  • Advanced Behavior Detection

    Goes beyond single-request analysis. Generates internal events to build complex multi-request scenarios before triggering blocks.

  • Proxy Integration

    Native integration with Nginx, Traefik, HAProxy, Apache, and Envoy. No separate appliance needed.

  • Kubernetes Ready

    Runs as a sidecar or within ingress controllers. Fits containerized and microservice architectures.

  • Console Dashboard

    Web-based management console for monitoring alerts, managing blocklists, and configuring the security engine.

  • Community Blocklists

    Free access to crowd-sourced IP blocklists updated in real-time from the CrowdSec network.

Kong Gateway WAF

  • Gateway-Embedded WAF

    WAF runs as a plugin inside the Kong Gateway process, inspecting API traffic at the same layer where routing, authentication, and rate limiting occur. No separate WAF appliance or additional proxy hop needed.

  • OWASP Top 10 Protection

    Built-in protection against common web application attacks including SQL injection, cross-site scripting, command injection, and path traversal at the API gateway layer.

  • Plugin Ecosystem

    Over 100 plugins for security, traffic control, authentication, and observability. WAF works alongside bot detection, IP restriction, CORS, ACL, and rate limiting plugins in a configurable execution chain.

  • Third-Party WAF Integrations

    Open plugin architecture supports third-party WAF engines including open-appsec (ML-driven detection) and Wallarm (API security). Teams can choose the WAF engine that fits their threat model.

  • Kubernetes-Native Deployment

    Kong Ingress Controller and Kong Kubernetes Operator provide native Kubernetes integration. WAF policies can be managed declaratively through Kubernetes CRDs alongside gateway configuration.

  • Hybrid Mode

    Cloud-managed control plane with self-hosted data planes. WAF policies are centrally managed and distributed to data planes running in any environment, including air-gapped networks.

  • AI Gateway

    Dedicated AI gateway capabilities including LLM proxy, token-based rate limiting, semantic caching, PII sanitization, prompt guardrails, and MCP server proxy. WAF protects AI endpoints alongside traditional APIs.

  • Declarative Configuration

    Gateway and WAF configuration can be managed as code through declarative YAML/JSON, enabling GitOps workflows and CI/CD pipeline integration for security policy changes.

  • Advanced Rate Limiting

    Enterprise-grade rate limiting with sliding window counters, consumer groups, and cluster-wide synchronization. Works in conjunction with WAF to prevent both application-layer attacks and abuse.

Which One Is Right for You?

The best WAF depends on your specific requirements, infrastructure, and team expertise.

CrowdSec Web Application Firewall

  • You want to start with a free tier
  • You're using: Linux, Docker, Kubernetes, FreeBSD, Windows (beta)
Learn more →

Kong Gateway WAF

  • You need: Organizations already using Kong as their API gateway, Kubernetes-native architectures needing gateway-level WAF, teams wanting unified API management and security in one platform, enterprises with microservices architectures routing all traffic through an API gateway
  • You're using: Linux (Ubuntu, RHEL, Debian, Amazon Linux, Alpine), Docker, Kubernetes (via Ingress Controller and Operator), AWS, Azure, GCP, ARM64, macOS (dev)
Learn more →

We recommend evaluating both options with a trial or free tier before committing. Consider your existing infrastructure, team expertise, compliance requirements, and budget.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better for startups: CrowdSec Web Application Firewall or Kong Gateway WAF?

CrowdSec Web Application Firewall offers a free tier while Kong Gateway WAF does not, which may be important for early-stage startups. Consider your immediate security needs and growth plans when choosing.

Which is more cost-effective: CrowdSec Web Application Firewall or Kong Gateway WAF?

CrowdSec Web Application Firewall offers a free tier while Kong Gateway WAF requires a paid plan. CrowdSec Web Application Firewall scores higher for value (4.7/5). Total cost depends on your traffic volume, required features, and support level needs.

Which works better with AWS: CrowdSec Web Application Firewall or Kong Gateway WAF?

Kong Gateway WAF explicitly supports AWS while CrowdSec Web Application Firewall's AWS integration may vary. Consider whether native AWS integration or cross-cloud portability matters more for your use case.

Which is better for enterprise: CrowdSec Web Application Firewall or Kong Gateway WAF?

Kong Gateway WAF is positioned for enterprise use cases, while CrowdSec Web Application Firewall may be more suited for small to mid-market organizations. Both offer compliance certifications important for enterprise. Enterprise buyers should evaluate SLAs, support options, and integration capabilities.