Coraza Web Application Firewall vs Myra Hyperscale WAF
Coraza Web Application Firewall and Myra Hyperscale WAF take different approaches to web application security. Consider your team's expertise and infrastructure preferences when evaluating these options.
Coraza Web Application Firewall and Myra Hyperscale WAF take fundamentally different approaches to web application security. Understanding your infrastructure and team capabilities will help determine which approach fits your needs.
Overview
Coraza Web Application Firewall and Myra Hyperscale WAF are both popular web application firewall solutions. This comparison will help you understand the key differences and choose the right one for your needs.
OWASP open source WAF written in Go, fully compatible with ModSecurity rules and OWASP Core Rule Set, designed as a modern alternative to ModSecurity with native support for Caddy, Traefik, and HAProxy.
German-made, GDPR-compliant cloud WAF built for critical infrastructure and regulated industries. BSI-qualified, NIS-2 and DORA compliant. Managed WAF service available. Blocks 8M+ malicious L7 requests per customer per year. Data processing exclusively in Germany on request.
Quick Comparison
| Feature | Coraza Web Application Firewall | Myra Hyperscale WAF |
|---|---|---|
| Overall Rating | 4.2/5 | 3.7/5 |
| Free Tier | Yes | No |
| Pricing Model | Free and open source (Apache 2.0) | Custom (quote-based) |
| Ease of Use | 3.8/5 | 4.0/5 |
| Value for Money | 4.8/5 | 3.2/5 |
| Support | 3.5/5 | 4.5/5 |
| Open Source | Yes | No |
| Platforms | Any platform running Go, Docker, Kubernetes, Linux, macOS, Windows | Any origin (own data center, cloud, hosting provider). Compatible with AWS, Azure, GCP, on-premises, and hybrid deployments via DNS-based integration. |
| Compliance | Supports PCI DSS compliance when configured with OWASP CRS | BSI-qualified (C5 Type 2), ISO 27001, PCI DSS, NIS-2 compliant, DORA compliant, GDPR compliant, IT-Grundschutz, SOC 2 Type 2 |
Pricing Comparison
Coraza Web Application Firewall
Model: Free and open source (Apache 2.0)
Free Tier AvailableOpen Source
Free
Myra Hyperscale WAF
Model: Custom (quote-based)
Myra WAF
Custom
Managed WAF Service
Custom (add-on)
Features Comparison
Coraza Web Application Firewall
-
ModSecurity Compatibility
Full compatibility with ModSecurity SecLang rule language. Existing ModSecurity rules and rule sets work without modification.
-
OWASP CRS Support
Native support for the OWASP Core Rule Set, providing protection against SQL injection, XSS, RCE, and other OWASP Top 10 threats.
-
Go Native
Pure Go implementation with no C dependencies. Embeddable as a library, usable as middleware, or deployable as a plugin for modern proxies.
-
Proxy Plugins
Official plugins for Caddy (coraza-caddy), Traefik, and HAProxy allow adding WAF protection with minimal configuration.
-
Kubernetes Ready
Lightweight enough to run as a sidecar or embedded in ingress controllers. Works with any Go-based K8s tooling.
-
Audit Logging
Detailed audit logging of blocked and flagged requests for security analysis and compliance reporting.
Myra Hyperscale WAF
-
OWASP Top 10 Protection
Blocks SQL injection, XSS, CSRF, and other OWASP Top 10 attacks. Blocks an average of 8 million malicious layer 7 requests per customer per year.
-
HTTP/S Request Filtering
Filters all HTTP and HTTPS requests with rules defined via simple comparisons or regular expressions. Near infinite scalability with no capacity constraints.
-
Managed WAF Service
Optional add-on where Myra security experts create tailored rule sets for your specific applications, provide ongoing optimization, and offer expert support on demand. Ideal for teams without dedicated WAF expertise.
-
Zero-Day Protection
Responds to newly discovered vulnerabilities with rapid rule updates. Proactive defense against zero-day exploits before patches are available.
-
Data Sovereignty (Germany)
On request, all data processing occurs exclusively in Germany. Full GDPR compliance and BSI-qualified infrastructure for organizations with strict European data sovereignty requirements.
-
NIS-2 and DORA Compliance
Designed for compliance with the EU Network and Information Systems Directive (NIS-2) and Digital Operational Resilience Act (DORA). Critical for financial institutions and essential service operators in the EU.
-
API Protection
Protects APIs against injection attacks, exploits, and data leaks. Detects faulty authentication and missing protection measures that could lead to service interruptions.
-
Intuitive Rule Management
Web-based UI for creating, editing, and managing WAF rules. Toggle rules on/off with a single click. Rules include parameters like name, log identifier, expiration date, conditions, and actions.
Which One Is Right for You?
The best WAF depends on your specific requirements, infrastructure, and team expertise.
Coraza Web Application Firewall
- You need: Teams migrating from ModSecurity, Kubernetes environments, Go-based applications, organizations using Caddy or Traefik, developers wanting embeddable WAF
- You want to start with a free tier
- You prefer open-source solutions
- You're using: Any platform running Go, Docker, Kubernetes, Linux, macOS, Windows
Myra Hyperscale WAF
- You need: European organizations with strict data sovereignty requirements. Banks, insurance companies, and financial institutions needing NIS-2 and DORA compliance. German public sector and critical infrastructure operators requiring BSI-qualified solutions. Mid-sized enterprises wanting a managed WAF without in-house security expertise.
- You're using: Any origin (own data center, cloud, hosting provider). Compatible with AWS, Azure, GCP, on-premises, and hybrid deployments via DNS-based integration.
We recommend evaluating both options with a trial or free tier before committing. Consider your existing infrastructure, team expertise, compliance requirements, and budget.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is better for startups: Coraza Web Application Firewall or Myra Hyperscale WAF?
Coraza Web Application Firewall offers a free tier while Myra Hyperscale WAF does not, which may be important for early-stage startups. Myra Hyperscale WAF scores higher for ease of use (4.0/5), which is valuable for smaller teams. Consider your immediate security needs and growth plans when choosing.
Which has better support: Coraza Web Application Firewall or Myra Hyperscale WAF?
Myra Hyperscale WAF has a higher support rating (4.5/5) compared to Coraza Web Application Firewall (3.5/5). However, support quality can vary based on your plan tier - enterprise customers typically receive more responsive support from both providers. Consider evaluating support during a trial period.
Which is easier to implement: Coraza Web Application Firewall or Myra Hyperscale WAF?
Myra Hyperscale WAF scores higher for ease of use (4.0/5) versus Coraza Web Application Firewall (3.8/5). The actual implementation effort depends on your existing infrastructure and team expertise.
Which is more cost-effective: Coraza Web Application Firewall or Myra Hyperscale WAF?
Coraza Web Application Firewall offers a free tier while Myra Hyperscale WAF requires a paid plan. Coraza Web Application Firewall scores higher for value (4.8/5). Total cost depends on your traffic volume, required features, and support level needs.
Which works better with AWS: Coraza Web Application Firewall or Myra Hyperscale WAF?
Myra Hyperscale WAF explicitly supports AWS while Coraza Web Application Firewall's AWS integration may vary. Consider whether native AWS integration or cross-cloud portability matters more for your use case.