WAFPlanet

Coraza Web Application Firewall vs Invicti

Coraza Web Application Firewall and Invicti take different approaches to web application security. Consider your team's expertise and infrastructure preferences when evaluating these options.

Coraza Web Application Firewall and Invicti take fundamentally different approaches to web application security. Understanding your infrastructure and team capabilities will help determine which approach fits your needs.

Overview

Coraza Web Application Firewall and Invicti are both popular web application firewall solutions. This comparison will help you understand the key differences and choose the right one for your needs.

OWASP open source WAF written in Go, fully compatible with ModSecurity rules and OWASP Core Rule Set, designed as a modern alternative to ModSecurity with native support for Caddy, Traefik, and HAProxy.

Application security testing platform offering DAST and IAST scanning. Formerly Netsparker. Products include Invicti (enterprise DAST) and Acunetix (SMB DAST). Not a WAF, but a vulnerability scanner that finds the vulnerabilities WAFs protect against. OWASP Gold sponsor. Proof-based scanning reduces false positives. Custom enterprise pricing.

Quick Comparison

Feature Coraza Web Application Firewall Invicti
Overall Rating 4.2/5 3.8/5
Free Tier Yes No
Pricing Model Free and open source (Apache 2.0) Custom (enterprise, annual contract)
Ease of Use 3.8/5 3.5/5
Value for Money 4.8/5 3.3/5
Support 3.5/5 4.0/5
Open Source Yes No
Platforms Any platform running Go, Docker, Kubernetes, Linux, macOS, Windows Scans any web application accessible via HTTP/HTTPS. Supports REST APIs, GraphQL, SOAP, single-page applications (React, Angular, Vue), and traditional server-rendered applications. On-premises scanner available for internal applications.
Compliance Supports PCI DSS compliance when configured with OWASP CRS SOC 2 Type 2, helps with PCI DSS, HIPAA, ISO 27001, GDPR compliance scanning

Pricing Comparison

Coraza Web Application Firewall

Model: Free and open source (Apache 2.0)

Free Tier Available

Open Source

Free

View full pricing →

Invicti

Model: Custom (enterprise, annual contract)

Acunetix (SMB)

Custom (starts ~$4,500/year)

Invicti (Enterprise)

Custom (annual contract)

View full pricing →

Features Comparison

Coraza Web Application Firewall

  • ModSecurity Compatibility

    Full compatibility with ModSecurity SecLang rule language. Existing ModSecurity rules and rule sets work without modification.

  • OWASP CRS Support

    Native support for the OWASP Core Rule Set, providing protection against SQL injection, XSS, RCE, and other OWASP Top 10 threats.

  • Go Native

    Pure Go implementation with no C dependencies. Embeddable as a library, usable as middleware, or deployable as a plugin for modern proxies.

  • Proxy Plugins

    Official plugins for Caddy (coraza-caddy), Traefik, and HAProxy allow adding WAF protection with minimal configuration.

  • Kubernetes Ready

    Lightweight enough to run as a sidecar or embedded in ingress controllers. Works with any Go-based K8s tooling.

  • Audit Logging

    Detailed audit logging of blocked and flagged requests for security analysis and compliance reporting.

Invicti

  • Proof-Based Scanning

    When a vulnerability is found, Invicti attempts to safely exploit it and provides concrete proof. For SQL injection, it extracts actual data. For file inclusion, it reads a specific file. This eliminates the false positive problem that plagues most security scanners.

  • DAST (Dynamic Application Security Testing)

    Tests running web applications by sending crafted HTTP requests and analyzing responses. Finds SQL injection, XSS, CSRF, file inclusion, authentication flaws, and other OWASP Top 10 vulnerabilities in production or staging environments.

  • IAST (Interactive Application Security Testing)

    Instruments the application at runtime to provide deeper vulnerability detection. Combines external scanning with internal application visibility. Finds vulnerabilities that pure DAST scanning might miss, such as insecure deserialization or business logic flaws.

  • API Security Testing

    Scans REST APIs, GraphQL endpoints, and SOAP services. Imports API definitions (OpenAPI/Swagger, WSDL, GraphQL schemas) and tests all endpoints for vulnerabilities. Critical for modern applications where APIs are the primary attack surface.

  • CI/CD Pipeline Integration

    Integrates with Jenkins, Azure DevOps, GitHub Actions, GitLab CI, and other CI/CD platforms. Automatically scans applications as part of the deployment pipeline. Fails builds if critical vulnerabilities are found.

  • WAF Rule Export

    Exports discovered vulnerabilities as WAF rules that can be imported into WAF products. Creates targeted virtual patches for specific vulnerabilities found during scanning. Bridges the gap between vulnerability discovery and runtime mitigation.

  • Compliance Reporting

    Generates compliance reports mapped to PCI DSS, HIPAA, ISO 27001, and OWASP Top 10 requirements. Useful for demonstrating due diligence during audits and regulatory reviews.

  • Single-Page Application Support

    Full support for scanning modern JavaScript applications built with React, Angular, or Vue. Invicti executes JavaScript, interacts with dynamic page elements, and discovers application states that traditional crawlers miss.

Which One Is Right for You?

The best WAF depends on your specific requirements, infrastructure, and team expertise.

Coraza Web Application Firewall

  • You need: Teams migrating from ModSecurity, Kubernetes environments, Go-based applications, organizations using Caddy or Traefik, developers wanting embeddable WAF
  • You want to start with a free tier
  • You prefer open-source solutions
  • You're using: Any platform running Go, Docker, Kubernetes, Linux, macOS, Windows
Learn more →

Invicti

  • You need: Enterprise security teams evaluating WAF effectiveness against actual application vulnerabilities. DevSecOps teams wanting automated vulnerability scanning in CI/CD pipelines. Organizations needing compliance scanning for PCI DSS, HIPAA, or ISO 27001. Security consultants performing application security assessments.
  • You're using: Scans any web application accessible via HTTP/HTTPS. Supports REST APIs, GraphQL, SOAP, single-page applications (React, Angular, Vue), and traditional server-rendered applications. On-premises scanner available for internal applications.
Learn more →

We recommend evaluating both options with a trial or free tier before committing. Consider your existing infrastructure, team expertise, compliance requirements, and budget.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better for startups: Coraza Web Application Firewall or Invicti?

Coraza Web Application Firewall offers a free tier while Invicti does not, which may be important for early-stage startups. Coraza Web Application Firewall scores higher for ease of use (3.8/5), which is valuable for smaller teams. Consider your immediate security needs and growth plans when choosing.

Which has better support: Coraza Web Application Firewall or Invicti?

Invicti has a higher support rating (4.0/5) compared to Coraza Web Application Firewall (3.5/5). However, support quality can vary based on your plan tier - enterprise customers typically receive more responsive support from both providers. Consider evaluating support during a trial period.

Which is easier to implement: Coraza Web Application Firewall or Invicti?

Coraza Web Application Firewall scores higher for ease of use (3.8/5) versus Invicti (3.5/5). The actual implementation effort depends on your existing infrastructure and team expertise.

Which is more cost-effective: Coraza Web Application Firewall or Invicti?

Coraza Web Application Firewall offers a free tier while Invicti requires a paid plan. Coraza Web Application Firewall scores higher for value (4.8/5). Total cost depends on your traffic volume, required features, and support level needs.

Which is better for enterprise: Coraza Web Application Firewall or Invicti?

Invicti is positioned for enterprise use cases, while Coraza Web Application Firewall may be more suited for small to mid-market organizations. Both offer compliance certifications important for enterprise. Enterprise buyers should evaluate SLAs, support options, and integration capabilities.