CDNetworks Application Shield vs Shield Security
CDNetworks Application Shield and Shield Security take different approaches to web application security. Consider your team's expertise and infrastructure preferences when evaluating these options.
CDNetworks Application Shield and Shield Security take fundamentally different approaches to web application security. Understanding your infrastructure and team capabilities will help determine which approach fits your needs.
Overview
CDNetworks Application Shield and Shield Security are both popular web application firewall solutions. This comparison will help you understand the key differences and choose the right one for your needs.
Cloud-based WAF integrated with CDNetworks' global CDN, offering signature-based threat detection, DDoS protection, and bot management across 1,500+ points of presence worldwide.
WordPress security plugin with SilentCAPTCHA bot detection, automatic IP blocking, firewall rules, and activity logging designed for hands-off, automated protection.
Quick Comparison
| Feature | CDNetworks Application Shield | Shield Security |
|---|---|---|
| Overall Rating | 3.7/5 | 3.8/5 |
| Free Tier | No | Yes |
| Pricing Model | Custom pricing, usage-based | Freemium (Free tier + annual ShieldPRO license) |
| Ease of Use | 3.5/5 | 4.0/5 |
| Value for Money | 3.5/5 | 4.0/5 |
| Support | 3.8/5 | 3.8/5 |
| Open Source | No | Yes |
| Platforms | Any web application, cloud-hosted sites, on-premises origins | WordPress (self-hosted) |
| Compliance | PCI DSS, ISO 27001, SOC 2 | Contact vendor |
Pricing Comparison
CDNetworks Application Shield
Model: Custom pricing, usage-based
Application Shield Standard
Custom pricing
Application Shield Advanced
Custom pricing
Shield Security
Model: Freemium (Free tier + annual ShieldPRO license)
Free Tier AvailableFree
$0
ShieldPRO (1 site)
$99/year (~$8.25/month)
ShieldPRO (agency)
From $249/year
Features Comparison
CDNetworks Application Shield
-
Edge-Based WAF
WAF filtering at 1,500+ global edge locations for low-latency protection close to end users.
-
DDoS Protection
Multi-layer DDoS mitigation covering network (L3/L4) and application (L7) layer attacks.
-
Bot Management
Identify and manage automated traffic including scrapers, credential stuffers, and inventory hoarders.
-
API Protection
Secure APIs against abuse, injection attacks, and unauthorized access with dedicated API security rules.
-
Virtual Patching
Quickly mitigate known vulnerabilities without modifying application code.
-
Real-Time Analytics
Comprehensive dashboards showing attack trends, blocked requests, and traffic patterns.
Shield Security
-
SilentCAPTCHA
Proprietary invisible bot detection that identifies automated threats without showing challenges to visitors.
-
AntiBot Detection Engine
Behavioral analysis engine that identifies and blocks malicious bots based on activity patterns.
-
Automatic IP Blocking
Builds reputation scores for visitors and automatically blocks IPs that exhibit malicious behavior patterns.
-
Firewall Rules
Protection against SQL injection, XSS, directory traversal, and other common WordPress attack vectors.
-
Activity Log
Comprehensive log of all security events, user actions, and blocked threats for auditing.
-
Traffic Rate Limiting
Controls request rates to prevent brute force attacks and resource exhaustion (ShieldPRO feature).
Which One Is Right for You?
The best WAF depends on your specific requirements, infrastructure, and team expertise.
CDNetworks Application Shield
- You need: Businesses with significant Asian traffic, organizations needing combined CDN and WAF, enterprises targeting China market
- You're using: Any web application, cloud-hosted sites, on-premises origins
Shield Security
- You need: WordPress site owners wanting automated hands-off security, sites plagued by bot traffic and automated attacks, agencies using MainWP for site management
- You want to start with a free tier
- You prefer open-source solutions
- You're using: WordPress (self-hosted)
We recommend evaluating both options with a trial or free tier before committing. Consider your existing infrastructure, team expertise, compliance requirements, and budget.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is better for startups: CDNetworks Application Shield or Shield Security?
Shield Security offers a free tier while CDNetworks Application Shield does not, making Shield Security more accessible for budget-conscious startups. Shield Security scores higher for ease of use (4.0/5), which is valuable for smaller teams. Consider your immediate security needs and growth plans when choosing.
Which has better support: CDNetworks Application Shield or Shield Security?
Shield Security has a higher support rating (3.8/5) compared to CDNetworks Application Shield (3.8/5). However, support quality can vary based on your plan tier - enterprise customers typically receive more responsive support from both providers. Consider evaluating support during a trial period.
Which is easier to implement: CDNetworks Application Shield or Shield Security?
Shield Security scores higher for ease of use (4.0/5) versus CDNetworks Application Shield (3.5/5). The actual implementation effort depends on your existing infrastructure and team expertise.
Which is more cost-effective: CDNetworks Application Shield or Shield Security?
Shield Security offers a free tier while CDNetworks Application Shield requires a paid plan. Shield Security scores higher for value (4.0/5). Total cost depends on your traffic volume, required features, and support level needs.
Which is better for WordPress: CDNetworks Application Shield or Shield Security?
Shield Security explicitly supports WordPress while CDNetworks Application Shield takes a more platform-agnostic approach. For WordPress-specific threats like plugin vulnerabilities and brute force attacks, look for providers with WordPress-specific rule sets.