CDNetworks Application Shield vs Radware Cloud WAF Service
Both CDNetworks Application Shield and Radware Cloud WAF Service are capable WAF solutions. The right choice depends on your specific infrastructure, budget, and feature requirements.
Overview
CDNetworks Application Shield and Radware Cloud WAF Service are both popular web application firewall solutions. This comparison will help you understand the key differences and choose the right one for your needs.
Cloud-based WAF integrated with CDNetworks' global CDN, offering signature-based threat detection, DDoS protection, and bot management across 1,500+ points of presence worldwide.
Fully managed cloud WAF combining automatic policy generation, advanced bot mitigation, and 24/7 expert support with industry-leading DDoS protection.
Quick Comparison
| Feature | CDNetworks Application Shield | Radware Cloud WAF Service |
|---|---|---|
| Overall Rating | 3.7/5 | 4.4/5 |
| Free Tier | No | No |
| Pricing Model | Custom pricing, usage-based | OPEX-based subscription |
| Ease of Use | 3.5/5 | 3.6/5 |
| Value for Money | 3.5/5 | 3.8/5 |
| Support | 3.8/5 | 4.6/5 |
| Platforms | Any web application, cloud-hosted sites, on-premises origins | Any web application, AWS, Azure, GCP, Kubernetes, on-premises |
| Compliance | PCI DSS, ISO 27001, SOC 2 | SOC 2, PCI DSS, ISO 27001, HIPAA |
Pricing Comparison
CDNetworks Application Shield
Model: Custom pricing, usage-based
Application Shield Standard
Custom pricing
Application Shield Advanced
Custom pricing
Radware Cloud WAF Service
Model: OPEX-based subscription
Standard
Custom pricing
Advanced
Custom pricing
Premium
Custom pricing
Features Comparison
CDNetworks Application Shield
-
Edge-Based WAF
WAF filtering at 1,500+ global edge locations for low-latency protection close to end users.
-
DDoS Protection
Multi-layer DDoS mitigation covering network (L3/L4) and application (L7) layer attacks.
-
Bot Management
Identify and manage automated traffic including scrapers, credential stuffers, and inventory hoarders.
-
API Protection
Secure APIs against abuse, injection attacks, and unauthorized access with dedicated API security rules.
-
Virtual Patching
Quickly mitigate known vulnerabilities without modifying application code.
-
Real-Time Analytics
Comprehensive dashboards showing attack trends, blocked requests, and traffic patterns.
Radware Cloud WAF Service
-
Automatic Policy Generation
Patented technology automatically creates and optimizes security policies for new applications.
-
Positive and Negative Security
Combines signature-based detection with positive security model for comprehensive protection.
-
Bot Manager
Advanced bot detection using behavioral analysis, device fingerprinting, and CAPTCHA challenges.
-
API Protection
Discover and protect APIs with schema validation, rate limiting, and anomaly detection.
-
DDoS Protection
Integrated network and application layer DDoS mitigation backed by Radware''s global scrubbing network.
-
Geo-Fencing
Block or allow traffic based on geographic location with granular country-level controls.
Which One Is Right for You?
The best WAF depends on your specific requirements, infrastructure, and team expertise.
CDNetworks Application Shield
- You need: Businesses with significant Asian traffic, organizations needing combined CDN and WAF, enterprises targeting China market
- You're using: Any web application, cloud-hosted sites, on-premises origins
Radware Cloud WAF Service
- You need: Mid-market to enterprise organizations, companies needing integrated WAF and DDoS, hybrid cloud environments, organizations valuing managed services
- You're using: Any web application, AWS, Azure, GCP, Kubernetes, on-premises
We recommend evaluating both options with a trial or free tier before committing. Consider your existing infrastructure, team expertise, compliance requirements, and budget.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which has better support: CDNetworks Application Shield or Radware Cloud WAF Service?
Radware Cloud WAF Service has a higher support rating (4.6/5) compared to CDNetworks Application Shield (3.8/5). However, support quality can vary based on your plan tier - enterprise customers typically receive more responsive support from both providers. Consider evaluating support during a trial period.
Which is easier to implement: CDNetworks Application Shield or Radware Cloud WAF Service?
Radware Cloud WAF Service scores higher for ease of use (3.6/5) versus CDNetworks Application Shield (3.5/5). The actual implementation effort depends on your existing infrastructure and team expertise.
Which is more cost-effective: CDNetworks Application Shield or Radware Cloud WAF Service?
Neither provider offers a completely free tier. Radware Cloud WAF Service scores higher for value (3.8/5). Total cost depends on your traffic volume, required features, and support level needs.
Which works better with AWS: CDNetworks Application Shield or Radware Cloud WAF Service?
Radware Cloud WAF Service explicitly supports AWS while CDNetworks Application Shield's AWS integration may vary. Consider whether native AWS integration or cross-cloud portability matters more for your use case.
Which is better for enterprise: CDNetworks Application Shield or Radware Cloud WAF Service?
Both CDNetworks Application Shield and Radware Cloud WAF Service are well-suited for enterprise deployments. Both offer compliance certifications important for enterprise. Enterprise buyers should evaluate SLAs, support options, and integration capabilities.