CDNetworks Application Shield vs Coraza Web Application Firewall
CDNetworks Application Shield and Coraza Web Application Firewall take different approaches to web application security. Consider your team's expertise and infrastructure preferences when evaluating these options.
CDNetworks Application Shield and Coraza Web Application Firewall take fundamentally different approaches to web application security. Understanding your infrastructure and team capabilities will help determine which approach fits your needs.
Overview
CDNetworks Application Shield and Coraza Web Application Firewall are both popular web application firewall solutions. This comparison will help you understand the key differences and choose the right one for your needs.
Cloud-based WAF integrated with CDNetworks' global CDN, offering signature-based threat detection, DDoS protection, and bot management across 1,500+ points of presence worldwide.
OWASP open source WAF written in Go, fully compatible with ModSecurity rules and OWASP Core Rule Set, designed as a modern alternative to ModSecurity with native support for Caddy, Traefik, and HAProxy.
Quick Comparison
| Feature | CDNetworks Application Shield | Coraza Web Application Firewall |
|---|---|---|
| Overall Rating | 3.7/5 | 4.2/5 |
| Free Tier | No | Yes |
| Pricing Model | Custom pricing, usage-based | Free and open source (Apache 2.0) |
| Ease of Use | 3.5/5 | 3.8/5 |
| Value for Money | 3.5/5 | 4.8/5 |
| Support | 3.8/5 | 3.5/5 |
| Open Source | No | Yes |
| Platforms | Any web application, cloud-hosted sites, on-premises origins | Any platform running Go, Docker, Kubernetes, Linux, macOS, Windows |
| Compliance | PCI DSS, ISO 27001, SOC 2 | Supports PCI DSS compliance when configured with OWASP CRS |
Pricing Comparison
CDNetworks Application Shield
Model: Custom pricing, usage-based
Application Shield Standard
Custom pricing
Application Shield Advanced
Custom pricing
Coraza Web Application Firewall
Model: Free and open source (Apache 2.0)
Free Tier AvailableOpen Source
Free
Features Comparison
CDNetworks Application Shield
-
Edge-Based WAF
WAF filtering at 1,500+ global edge locations for low-latency protection close to end users.
-
DDoS Protection
Multi-layer DDoS mitigation covering network (L3/L4) and application (L7) layer attacks.
-
Bot Management
Identify and manage automated traffic including scrapers, credential stuffers, and inventory hoarders.
-
API Protection
Secure APIs against abuse, injection attacks, and unauthorized access with dedicated API security rules.
-
Virtual Patching
Quickly mitigate known vulnerabilities without modifying application code.
-
Real-Time Analytics
Comprehensive dashboards showing attack trends, blocked requests, and traffic patterns.
Coraza Web Application Firewall
-
ModSecurity Compatibility
Full compatibility with ModSecurity SecLang rule language. Existing ModSecurity rules and rule sets work without modification.
-
OWASP CRS Support
Native support for the OWASP Core Rule Set, providing protection against SQL injection, XSS, RCE, and other OWASP Top 10 threats.
-
Go Native
Pure Go implementation with no C dependencies. Embeddable as a library, usable as middleware, or deployable as a plugin for modern proxies.
-
Proxy Plugins
Official plugins for Caddy (coraza-caddy), Traefik, and HAProxy allow adding WAF protection with minimal configuration.
-
Kubernetes Ready
Lightweight enough to run as a sidecar or embedded in ingress controllers. Works with any Go-based K8s tooling.
-
Audit Logging
Detailed audit logging of blocked and flagged requests for security analysis and compliance reporting.
Which One Is Right for You?
The best WAF depends on your specific requirements, infrastructure, and team expertise.
CDNetworks Application Shield
- You need: Businesses with significant Asian traffic, organizations needing combined CDN and WAF, enterprises targeting China market
- You're using: Any web application, cloud-hosted sites, on-premises origins
Coraza Web Application Firewall
- You need: Teams migrating from ModSecurity, Kubernetes environments, Go-based applications, organizations using Caddy or Traefik, developers wanting embeddable WAF
- You want to start with a free tier
- You prefer open-source solutions
- You're using: Any platform running Go, Docker, Kubernetes, Linux, macOS, Windows
We recommend evaluating both options with a trial or free tier before committing. Consider your existing infrastructure, team expertise, compliance requirements, and budget.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is better for startups: CDNetworks Application Shield or Coraza Web Application Firewall?
Coraza Web Application Firewall offers a free tier while CDNetworks Application Shield does not, making Coraza Web Application Firewall more accessible for budget-conscious startups. Coraza Web Application Firewall scores higher for ease of use (3.8/5), which is valuable for smaller teams. Consider your immediate security needs and growth plans when choosing.
Which has better support: CDNetworks Application Shield or Coraza Web Application Firewall?
CDNetworks Application Shield has a higher support rating (3.8/5) compared to Coraza Web Application Firewall (3.5/5). However, support quality can vary based on your plan tier - enterprise customers typically receive more responsive support from both providers. Consider evaluating support during a trial period.
Which is easier to implement: CDNetworks Application Shield or Coraza Web Application Firewall?
Coraza Web Application Firewall scores higher for ease of use (3.8/5) versus CDNetworks Application Shield (3.5/5). The actual implementation effort depends on your existing infrastructure and team expertise.
Which is more cost-effective: CDNetworks Application Shield or Coraza Web Application Firewall?
Coraza Web Application Firewall offers a free tier while CDNetworks Application Shield requires a paid plan. Coraza Web Application Firewall scores higher for value (4.8/5). Total cost depends on your traffic volume, required features, and support level needs.
Which is better for enterprise: CDNetworks Application Shield or Coraza Web Application Firewall?
CDNetworks Application Shield is positioned for enterprise use cases, while Coraza Web Application Firewall may be more suited for small to mid-market organizations. Both offer compliance certifications important for enterprise. Enterprise buyers should evaluate SLAs, support options, and integration capabilities.