WAFPlanet

Bunny Shield vs Coraza Web Application Firewall

Bunny Shield and Coraza Web Application Firewall take different approaches to web application security. Consider your team's expertise and infrastructure preferences when evaluating these options.

Bunny Shield and Coraza Web Application Firewall take fundamentally different approaches to web application security. Understanding your infrastructure and team capabilities will help determine which approach fits your needs.

Overview

Bunny Shield and Coraza Web Application Firewall are both popular web application firewall solutions. This comparison will help you understand the key differences and choose the right one for your needs.

Affordable all-in-one web security from bunny.net, combining AI-powered WAF, DDoS protection, bot mitigation, and upload scanning with a generous free tier and simple pricing.

OWASP open source WAF written in Go, fully compatible with ModSecurity rules and OWASP Core Rule Set, designed as a modern alternative to ModSecurity with native support for Caddy, Traefik, and HAProxy.

Quick Comparison

Feature Bunny Shield Coraza Web Application Firewall
Overall Rating 4.1/5 4.2/5
Free Tier Yes Yes
Pricing Model Per feature tier + overage Free and open source (Apache 2.0)
Ease of Use 4.6/5 3.8/5
Value for Money 4.7/5 4.8/5
Support 4.2/5 3.5/5
Open Source No Yes
Platforms Any web application, WordPress, static sites, APIs Any platform running Go, Docker, Kubernetes, Linux, macOS, Windows
Compliance Contact vendor Supports PCI DSS compliance when configured with OWASP CRS

Pricing Comparison

Bunny Shield

Model: Per feature tier + overage

Free Tier Available

Basic

$0/month

Advanced

$9.50/month

Business

$99/month

Enterprise

Contact Sales

View full pricing →

Coraza Web Application Firewall

Model: Free and open source (Apache 2.0)

Free Tier Available

Open Source

Free

View full pricing →

Features Comparison

Bunny Shield

  • AI-Powered WAF

    Next-gen WAF engine that blocks zero-day exploits, OWASP Top 10, and emerging risks with AI recommendations and real-time logs.

  • DDoS Protection

    Volumetric and application-layer DDoS mitigation backed by 250+ Tbps network capacity across 119 global scrubbing centers.

  • Global Rate Limiting

    Set precise rate limits per IP, user, or path globally across your entire infrastructure to control abuse.

  • Bot Mitigation

    Detect, block, and neutralize malicious bots in real time using behavioral fingerprinting without impacting legitimate users.

  • Access Lists

    Block traffic using curated threat lists for VPNs, Tor nodes, and other threat sources, or create custom access controls.

  • Upload Scanning

    Automatically scan uploaded files for viruses, malware, and CSAM to prevent harmful content from reaching your platform.

Coraza Web Application Firewall

  • ModSecurity Compatibility

    Full compatibility with ModSecurity SecLang rule language. Existing ModSecurity rules and rule sets work without modification.

  • OWASP CRS Support

    Native support for the OWASP Core Rule Set, providing protection against SQL injection, XSS, RCE, and other OWASP Top 10 threats.

  • Go Native

    Pure Go implementation with no C dependencies. Embeddable as a library, usable as middleware, or deployable as a plugin for modern proxies.

  • Proxy Plugins

    Official plugins for Caddy (coraza-caddy), Traefik, and HAProxy allow adding WAF protection with minimal configuration.

  • Kubernetes Ready

    Lightweight enough to run as a sidecar or embedded in ingress controllers. Works with any Go-based K8s tooling.

  • Audit Logging

    Detailed audit logging of blocked and flagged requests for security analysis and compliance reporting.

Which One Is Right for You?

The best WAF depends on your specific requirements, infrastructure, and team expertise.

Bunny Shield

  • You need: Small to medium businesses, startups, developers, cost-conscious organizations wanting comprehensive security, sites already using bunny.net CDN
  • You want to start with a free tier
  • You're using: Any web application, WordPress, static sites, APIs
Learn more →

Coraza Web Application Firewall

  • You need: Teams migrating from ModSecurity, Kubernetes environments, Go-based applications, organizations using Caddy or Traefik, developers wanting embeddable WAF
  • You want to start with a free tier
  • You prefer open-source solutions
  • You're using: Any platform running Go, Docker, Kubernetes, Linux, macOS, Windows
Learn more →

We recommend evaluating both options with a trial or free tier before committing. Consider your existing infrastructure, team expertise, compliance requirements, and budget.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better for startups: Bunny Shield or Coraza Web Application Firewall?

Both Bunny Shield and Coraza Web Application Firewall offer free tiers, making them accessible for startups. Bunny Shield scores higher for ease of use (4.6/5), which is valuable for smaller teams. Consider your immediate security needs and growth plans when choosing.

Which has better support: Bunny Shield or Coraza Web Application Firewall?

Bunny Shield has a higher support rating (4.2/5) compared to Coraza Web Application Firewall (3.5/5). However, support quality can vary based on your plan tier - enterprise customers typically receive more responsive support from both providers. Consider evaluating support during a trial period.

Which is easier to implement: Bunny Shield or Coraza Web Application Firewall?

Bunny Shield scores higher for ease of use (4.6/5) versus Coraza Web Application Firewall (3.8/5). The actual implementation effort depends on your existing infrastructure and team expertise.

Which is more cost-effective: Bunny Shield or Coraza Web Application Firewall?

Both providers offer free tiers, making it easy to start without commitment. Coraza Web Application Firewall scores higher for value (4.8/5). Total cost depends on your traffic volume, required features, and support level needs.

Which is better for WordPress: Bunny Shield or Coraza Web Application Firewall?

Bunny Shield explicitly supports WordPress while Coraza Web Application Firewall takes a more platform-agnostic approach. For WordPress-specific threats like plugin vulnerabilities and brute force attacks, look for providers with WordPress-specific rule sets.