WAFPlanet

BunkerWeb Open Source WAF vs Radware Cloud WAF Service

BunkerWeb Open Source WAF and Radware Cloud WAF Service take different approaches to web application security. Consider your team's expertise and infrastructure preferences when evaluating these options.

BunkerWeb Open Source WAF and Radware Cloud WAF Service take fundamentally different approaches to web application security. Understanding your infrastructure and team capabilities will help determine which approach fits your needs.

Overview

BunkerWeb Open Source WAF and Radware Cloud WAF Service are both popular web application firewall solutions. This comparison will help you understand the key differences and choose the right one for your needs.

Next-generation open source WAF built on NGINX with ModSecurity integration, offering comprehensive web security with an intuitive web UI and extensive plugin system.

Fully managed cloud WAF combining automatic policy generation, advanced bot mitigation, and 24/7 expert support with industry-leading DDoS protection.

Quick Comparison

Feature BunkerWeb Open Source WAF Radware Cloud WAF Service
Overall Rating 4.0/5 4.4/5
Free Tier Yes No
Pricing Model Free (Open Source) / Pro Support OPEX-based subscription
Ease of Use 3.8/5 3.6/5
Value for Money 4.9/5 3.8/5
Support 3.2/5 4.6/5
Open Source Yes No
Platforms Linux, Docker, Docker Swarm, Kubernetes, any NGINX-compatible environment Any web application, AWS, Azure, GCP, Kubernetes, on-premises
Compliance N/A (self-hosted, compliance depends on implementation) SOC 2, PCI DSS, ISO 27001, HIPAA

Pricing Comparison

BunkerWeb Open Source WAF

Model: Free (Open Source) / Pro Support

Free Tier Available

Community Edition

Free

Pro Support

Contact for pricing

View full pricing →

Radware Cloud WAF Service

Model: OPEX-based subscription

Standard

Custom pricing

Advanced

Custom pricing

Premium

Custom pricing

View full pricing →

Features Comparison

BunkerWeb Open Source WAF

  • ModSecurity Integration

    Built-in ModSecurity WAF with OWASP Core Rule Set for comprehensive protection against web application attacks.

  • Bot Protection

    Block malicious bots with challenge-based verification using cookies, JavaScript tests, captchas, or third-party services.

  • Rate Limiting & DDoS Protection

    Limit connections and requests from clients, automatically ban suspicious activities triggering abnormal HTTP status codes.

  • IP Reputation

    Block known bad IPs using external blacklists and DNSBL integration.

  • Web UI Management

    User-friendly graphical interface for configuration and monitoring without command-line expertise.

  • Plugin System

    Extend functionality with official and community plugins including ClamAV antivirus, Coraza WAF, and notification integrations.

Radware Cloud WAF Service

  • Automatic Policy Generation

    Patented technology automatically creates and optimizes security policies for new applications.

  • Positive and Negative Security

    Combines signature-based detection with positive security model for comprehensive protection.

  • Bot Manager

    Advanced bot detection using behavioral analysis, device fingerprinting, and CAPTCHA challenges.

  • API Protection

    Discover and protect APIs with schema validation, rate limiting, and anomaly detection.

  • DDoS Protection

    Integrated network and application layer DDoS mitigation backed by Radware''s global scrubbing network.

  • Geo-Fencing

    Block or allow traffic based on geographic location with granular country-level controls.

Which One Is Right for You?

The best WAF depends on your specific requirements, infrastructure, and team expertise.

BunkerWeb Open Source WAF

  • You need: Security-conscious organizations wanting data control, DevOps teams comfortable with self-hosting, budget-constrained projects, privacy-focused deployments
  • You want to start with a free tier
  • You prefer open-source solutions
  • You're using: Linux, Docker, Docker Swarm, Kubernetes, any NGINX-compatible environment
Learn more →

Radware Cloud WAF Service

  • You need: Mid-market to enterprise organizations, companies needing integrated WAF and DDoS, hybrid cloud environments, organizations valuing managed services
  • You're using: Any web application, AWS, Azure, GCP, Kubernetes, on-premises
Learn more →

We recommend evaluating both options with a trial or free tier before committing. Consider your existing infrastructure, team expertise, compliance requirements, and budget.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better for startups: BunkerWeb Open Source WAF or Radware Cloud WAF Service?

BunkerWeb Open Source WAF offers a free tier while Radware Cloud WAF Service does not, which may be important for early-stage startups. BunkerWeb Open Source WAF scores higher for ease of use (3.8/5), which is valuable for smaller teams. Consider your immediate security needs and growth plans when choosing.

Which has better support: BunkerWeb Open Source WAF or Radware Cloud WAF Service?

Radware Cloud WAF Service has a higher support rating (4.6/5) compared to BunkerWeb Open Source WAF (3.2/5). However, support quality can vary based on your plan tier - enterprise customers typically receive more responsive support from both providers. Consider evaluating support during a trial period.

Which is easier to implement: BunkerWeb Open Source WAF or Radware Cloud WAF Service?

BunkerWeb Open Source WAF scores higher for ease of use (3.8/5) versus Radware Cloud WAF Service (3.6/5). The actual implementation effort depends on your existing infrastructure and team expertise.

Which is more cost-effective: BunkerWeb Open Source WAF or Radware Cloud WAF Service?

BunkerWeb Open Source WAF offers a free tier while Radware Cloud WAF Service requires a paid plan. BunkerWeb Open Source WAF scores higher for value (4.9/5). Total cost depends on your traffic volume, required features, and support level needs.

Which works better with AWS: BunkerWeb Open Source WAF or Radware Cloud WAF Service?

Radware Cloud WAF Service explicitly supports AWS while BunkerWeb Open Source WAF's AWS integration may vary. Consider whether native AWS integration or cross-cloud portability matters more for your use case.