WAFPlanet

BulletProof Security vs Invicti

Both BulletProof Security and Invicti are capable WAF solutions. The right choice depends on your specific infrastructure, budget, and feature requirements.

Overview

BulletProof Security and Invicti are both popular web application firewall solutions. This comparison will help you understand the key differences and choose the right one for your needs.

WordPress security plugin featuring .htaccess-based firewall protection, one-click setup wizard, login security, database backups, and a lifetime Pro license for unlimited sites.

Application security testing platform offering DAST and IAST scanning. Formerly Netsparker. Products include Invicti (enterprise DAST) and Acunetix (SMB DAST). Not a WAF, but a vulnerability scanner that finds the vulnerabilities WAFs protect against. OWASP Gold sponsor. Proof-based scanning reduces false positives. Custom enterprise pricing.

Quick Comparison

Feature BulletProof Security Invicti
Overall Rating 3.7/5 3.8/5
Free Tier Yes No
Pricing Model Free edition + one-time Pro license (lifetime) Custom (enterprise, annual contract)
Ease of Use 3.4/5 3.5/5
Value for Money 4.5/5 3.3/5
Support 3.5/5 4.0/5
Platforms WordPress (self-hosted) Scans any web application accessible via HTTP/HTTPS. Supports REST APIs, GraphQL, SOAP, single-page applications (React, Angular, Vue), and traditional server-rendered applications. On-premises scanner available for internal applications.
Compliance Contact vendor SOC 2 Type 2, helps with PCI DSS, HIPAA, ISO 27001, GDPR compliance scanning

Pricing Comparison

BulletProof Security

Model: Free edition + one-time Pro license (lifetime)

Free Tier Available

Free

$0

Pro (Lifetime)

$69.95 one-time

View full pricing →

Invicti

Model: Custom (enterprise, annual contract)

Acunetix (SMB)

Custom (starts ~$4,500/year)

Invicti (Enterprise)

Custom (annual contract)

View full pricing →

Features Comparison

BulletProof Security

  • .htaccess Firewall

    Server-level request filtering via Apache .htaccess rules blocking SQL injection, XSS, and code injection.

  • Setup Wizard

    One-click automated setup that configures .htaccess firewall rules without manual configuration.

  • Login Security

    Login monitoring, failed login lockout, and idle session logout to prevent unauthorized access.

  • MScan Malware Scanner

    Scans for malware, modified files, and suspicious code with automated quarantine and restore (Pro).

  • Database Backup

    Scheduled and manual database backups with email notifications and backup management.

  • Real-Time File Monitoring

    Monitors file system changes in real-time and alerts on unauthorized modifications (Pro).

Invicti

  • Proof-Based Scanning

    When a vulnerability is found, Invicti attempts to safely exploit it and provides concrete proof. For SQL injection, it extracts actual data. For file inclusion, it reads a specific file. This eliminates the false positive problem that plagues most security scanners.

  • DAST (Dynamic Application Security Testing)

    Tests running web applications by sending crafted HTTP requests and analyzing responses. Finds SQL injection, XSS, CSRF, file inclusion, authentication flaws, and other OWASP Top 10 vulnerabilities in production or staging environments.

  • IAST (Interactive Application Security Testing)

    Instruments the application at runtime to provide deeper vulnerability detection. Combines external scanning with internal application visibility. Finds vulnerabilities that pure DAST scanning might miss, such as insecure deserialization or business logic flaws.

  • API Security Testing

    Scans REST APIs, GraphQL endpoints, and SOAP services. Imports API definitions (OpenAPI/Swagger, WSDL, GraphQL schemas) and tests all endpoints for vulnerabilities. Critical for modern applications where APIs are the primary attack surface.

  • CI/CD Pipeline Integration

    Integrates with Jenkins, Azure DevOps, GitHub Actions, GitLab CI, and other CI/CD platforms. Automatically scans applications as part of the deployment pipeline. Fails builds if critical vulnerabilities are found.

  • WAF Rule Export

    Exports discovered vulnerabilities as WAF rules that can be imported into WAF products. Creates targeted virtual patches for specific vulnerabilities found during scanning. Bridges the gap between vulnerability discovery and runtime mitigation.

  • Compliance Reporting

    Generates compliance reports mapped to PCI DSS, HIPAA, ISO 27001, and OWASP Top 10 requirements. Useful for demonstrating due diligence during audits and regulatory reviews.

  • Single-Page Application Support

    Full support for scanning modern JavaScript applications built with React, Angular, or Vue. Invicti executes JavaScript, interacts with dynamic page elements, and discovers application states that traditional crawlers miss.

Which One Is Right for You?

The best WAF depends on your specific requirements, infrastructure, and team expertise.

BulletProof Security

  • You need: WordPress agencies needing affordable security for many sites, Apache-hosted WordPress sites, budget-conscious users wanting lifetime licensing
  • You want to start with a free tier
  • You're using: WordPress (self-hosted)
Learn more →

Invicti

  • You need: Enterprise security teams evaluating WAF effectiveness against actual application vulnerabilities. DevSecOps teams wanting automated vulnerability scanning in CI/CD pipelines. Organizations needing compliance scanning for PCI DSS, HIPAA, or ISO 27001. Security consultants performing application security assessments.
  • You're using: Scans any web application accessible via HTTP/HTTPS. Supports REST APIs, GraphQL, SOAP, single-page applications (React, Angular, Vue), and traditional server-rendered applications. On-premises scanner available for internal applications.
Learn more →

We recommend evaluating both options with a trial or free tier before committing. Consider your existing infrastructure, team expertise, compliance requirements, and budget.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better for startups: BulletProof Security or Invicti?

BulletProof Security offers a free tier while Invicti does not, which may be important for early-stage startups. Invicti scores higher for ease of use (3.5/5), which is valuable for smaller teams. Consider your immediate security needs and growth plans when choosing.

Which has better support: BulletProof Security or Invicti?

Invicti has a higher support rating (4.0/5) compared to BulletProof Security (3.5/5). However, support quality can vary based on your plan tier - enterprise customers typically receive more responsive support from both providers. Consider evaluating support during a trial period.

Which is easier to implement: BulletProof Security or Invicti?

Invicti scores higher for ease of use (3.5/5) versus BulletProof Security (3.4/5). The actual implementation effort depends on your existing infrastructure and team expertise.

Which is more cost-effective: BulletProof Security or Invicti?

BulletProof Security offers a free tier while Invicti requires a paid plan. BulletProof Security scores higher for value (4.5/5). Total cost depends on your traffic volume, required features, and support level needs.

Which is better for WordPress: BulletProof Security or Invicti?

BulletProof Security explicitly supports WordPress while Invicti takes a more platform-agnostic approach. For WordPress-specific threats like plugin vulnerabilities and brute force attacks, look for providers with WordPress-specific rule sets.