WAFPlanet

Barracuda Web Application Firewall vs StackPath Web Application Firewall

Both Barracuda Web Application Firewall and StackPath Web Application Firewall are capable WAF solutions. The right choice depends on your specific infrastructure, budget, and feature requirements.

Overview

Barracuda Web Application Firewall and StackPath Web Application Firewall are both popular web application firewall solutions. This comparison will help you understand the key differences and choose the right one for your needs.

Comprehensive WAF with flexible deployment options from appliances to cloud, featuring strong bot defense, API protection, and deep DevOps integration.

Edge-based WAF that was part of StackPath's CDN and edge computing platform. Discontinued in June 2024 when the company shut down operations.

Quick Comparison

Feature Barracuda Web Application Firewall StackPath Web Application Firewall
Overall Rating 4.1/5 1.0/5
Free Tier No No
Pricing Model Appliance + subscription / WAF-as-a-Service Per site / Per bandwidth tier (discontinued)
Ease of Use 3.5/5 1.0/5
Value for Money 4.2/5 1.0/5
Support 4.0/5 1.0/5
Platforms Any web application, AWS, Azure, GCP, VMware, Hyper-V, on-premises Cloud (SaaS, discontinued)
Compliance PCI DSS, HIPAA, SOC 2, FIPS 140-2 SOC 2, PCI DSS (historical)

Pricing Comparison

Barracuda Web Application Firewall

Model: Appliance + subscription / WAF-as-a-Service

WAF-as-a-Service Basic

Starting ~$99/month

WAF-as-a-Service Advanced

Starting ~$299/month

WAF Appliance

Contact for pricing

View full pricing →

StackPath Web Application Firewall

Model: Per site / Per bandwidth tier (discontinued)

Edge Delivery 200

$27.50/month

Edge Delivery 2000

$275/month

View full pricing →

Features Comparison

Barracuda Web Application Firewall

  • Advanced Bot Protection

    Machine learning-powered detection distinguishes malicious bots from legitimate traffic and good bots.

  • API Discovery & Protection

    Automatically discover APIs and generate security rules from OpenAPI definition files.

  • JSON & XML Security

    Deep inspection of JSON payloads and XML protection against schema poisoning attacks.

  • SSL/TLS Offloading

    Hardware-accelerated SSL termination with support for modern TLS protocols and cipher suites.

  • DevOps Integration

    Full REST API with OpenAPI spec and native support for IaC tools like Terraform and Ansible.

  • Active Directory Integration

    Integrate with AD, LDAP, RADIUS for authentication with SAML SSO and two-factor authentication support.

StackPath Web Application Firewall

  • Edge WAF

    Application-layer firewall deployed at the edge, filtering traffic before it reached origin servers. Included OWASP Top 10 coverage and custom rule support.

  • DDoS Protection

    Volumetric and application-layer DDoS mitigation integrated with the CDN edge network.

  • Bot Management

    Bot detection and mitigation using behavioral analysis and challenge-based verification.

  • Real-time Analytics

    Dashboard showing traffic patterns, blocked requests, and attack trends across protected sites.

Which One Is Right for You?

The best WAF depends on your specific requirements, infrastructure, and team expertise.

Barracuda Web Application Firewall

  • You need: Mid-market organizations, DevOps teams, hybrid deployments, organizations needing on-premises WAF options
  • You're using: Any web application, AWS, Azure, GCP, VMware, Hyper-V, on-premises
Learn more →

StackPath Web Application Firewall

  • You need: Historical reference only. StackPath is no longer available.
  • You're using: Cloud (SaaS, discontinued)
Learn more →

We recommend evaluating both options with a trial or free tier before committing. Consider your existing infrastructure, team expertise, compliance requirements, and budget.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which has better support: Barracuda Web Application Firewall or StackPath Web Application Firewall?

Barracuda Web Application Firewall has a higher support rating (4.0/5) compared to StackPath Web Application Firewall (1.0/5). However, support quality can vary based on your plan tier - enterprise customers typically receive more responsive support from both providers. Consider evaluating support during a trial period.

Which is easier to implement: Barracuda Web Application Firewall or StackPath Web Application Firewall?

Barracuda Web Application Firewall scores higher for ease of use (3.5/5) versus StackPath Web Application Firewall (1.0/5). The actual implementation effort depends on your existing infrastructure and team expertise.

Which is more cost-effective: Barracuda Web Application Firewall or StackPath Web Application Firewall?

Neither provider offers a completely free tier. Barracuda Web Application Firewall scores higher for value (4.2/5). Total cost depends on your traffic volume, required features, and support level needs.

Which works better with AWS: Barracuda Web Application Firewall or StackPath Web Application Firewall?

Barracuda Web Application Firewall explicitly supports AWS while StackPath Web Application Firewall's AWS integration may vary. Consider whether native AWS integration or cross-cloud portability matters more for your use case.