Barracuda Web Application Firewall vs CDNetworks Application Shield
Both Barracuda Web Application Firewall and CDNetworks Application Shield are capable WAF solutions. The right choice depends on your specific infrastructure, budget, and feature requirements.
Overview
Barracuda Web Application Firewall and CDNetworks Application Shield are both popular web application firewall solutions. This comparison will help you understand the key differences and choose the right one for your needs.
Comprehensive WAF with flexible deployment options from appliances to cloud, featuring strong bot defense, API protection, and deep DevOps integration.
Cloud-based WAF integrated with CDNetworks' global CDN, offering signature-based threat detection, DDoS protection, and bot management across 1,500+ points of presence worldwide.
Quick Comparison
| Feature | Barracuda Web Application Firewall | CDNetworks Application Shield |
|---|---|---|
| Overall Rating | 4.1/5 | 3.7/5 |
| Free Tier | No | No |
| Pricing Model | Appliance + subscription / WAF-as-a-Service | Custom pricing, usage-based |
| Ease of Use | 3.5/5 | 3.5/5 |
| Value for Money | 4.2/5 | 3.5/5 |
| Support | 4.0/5 | 3.8/5 |
| Platforms | Any web application, AWS, Azure, GCP, VMware, Hyper-V, on-premises | Any web application, cloud-hosted sites, on-premises origins |
| Compliance | PCI DSS, HIPAA, SOC 2, FIPS 140-2 | PCI DSS, ISO 27001, SOC 2 |
Pricing Comparison
Barracuda Web Application Firewall
Model: Appliance + subscription / WAF-as-a-Service
WAF-as-a-Service Basic
Starting ~$99/month
WAF-as-a-Service Advanced
Starting ~$299/month
WAF Appliance
Contact for pricing
CDNetworks Application Shield
Model: Custom pricing, usage-based
Application Shield Standard
Custom pricing
Application Shield Advanced
Custom pricing
Features Comparison
Barracuda Web Application Firewall
-
Advanced Bot Protection
Machine learning-powered detection distinguishes malicious bots from legitimate traffic and good bots.
-
API Discovery & Protection
Automatically discover APIs and generate security rules from OpenAPI definition files.
-
JSON & XML Security
Deep inspection of JSON payloads and XML protection against schema poisoning attacks.
-
SSL/TLS Offloading
Hardware-accelerated SSL termination with support for modern TLS protocols and cipher suites.
-
DevOps Integration
Full REST API with OpenAPI spec and native support for IaC tools like Terraform and Ansible.
-
Active Directory Integration
Integrate with AD, LDAP, RADIUS for authentication with SAML SSO and two-factor authentication support.
CDNetworks Application Shield
-
Edge-Based WAF
WAF filtering at 1,500+ global edge locations for low-latency protection close to end users.
-
DDoS Protection
Multi-layer DDoS mitigation covering network (L3/L4) and application (L7) layer attacks.
-
Bot Management
Identify and manage automated traffic including scrapers, credential stuffers, and inventory hoarders.
-
API Protection
Secure APIs against abuse, injection attacks, and unauthorized access with dedicated API security rules.
-
Virtual Patching
Quickly mitigate known vulnerabilities without modifying application code.
-
Real-Time Analytics
Comprehensive dashboards showing attack trends, blocked requests, and traffic patterns.
Which One Is Right for You?
The best WAF depends on your specific requirements, infrastructure, and team expertise.
Barracuda Web Application Firewall
- You need: Mid-market organizations, DevOps teams, hybrid deployments, organizations needing on-premises WAF options
- You're using: Any web application, AWS, Azure, GCP, VMware, Hyper-V, on-premises
CDNetworks Application Shield
- You need: Businesses with significant Asian traffic, organizations needing combined CDN and WAF, enterprises targeting China market
- You're using: Any web application, cloud-hosted sites, on-premises origins
We recommend evaluating both options with a trial or free tier before committing. Consider your existing infrastructure, team expertise, compliance requirements, and budget.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which has better support: Barracuda Web Application Firewall or CDNetworks Application Shield?
Barracuda Web Application Firewall has a higher support rating (4.0/5) compared to CDNetworks Application Shield (3.8/5). However, support quality can vary based on your plan tier - enterprise customers typically receive more responsive support from both providers. Consider evaluating support during a trial period.
Which is easier to implement: Barracuda Web Application Firewall or CDNetworks Application Shield?
CDNetworks Application Shield scores higher for ease of use (3.5/5) versus Barracuda Web Application Firewall (3.5/5). The actual implementation effort depends on your existing infrastructure and team expertise.
Which is more cost-effective: Barracuda Web Application Firewall or CDNetworks Application Shield?
Neither provider offers a completely free tier. Barracuda Web Application Firewall scores higher for value (4.2/5). Total cost depends on your traffic volume, required features, and support level needs.
Which works better with AWS: Barracuda Web Application Firewall or CDNetworks Application Shield?
Barracuda Web Application Firewall explicitly supports AWS while CDNetworks Application Shield's AWS integration may vary. Consider whether native AWS integration or cross-cloud portability matters more for your use case.
Which is better for enterprise: Barracuda Web Application Firewall or CDNetworks Application Shield?
CDNetworks Application Shield is positioned for enterprise use cases, while Barracuda Web Application Firewall may be more suited for small to mid-market organizations. Both offer compliance certifications important for enterprise. Enterprise buyers should evaluate SLAs, support options, and integration capabilities.