Azure Web Application Firewall vs Reblaze (Link11) Web Security
Both Azure Web Application Firewall and Reblaze (Link11) Web Security are capable WAF solutions. The right choice depends on your specific infrastructure, budget, and feature requirements.
Overview
Azure Web Application Firewall and Reblaze (Link11) Web Security are both popular web application firewall solutions. This comparison will help you understand the key differences and choose the right one for your needs.
Microsoft's cloud-native WAF integrated with Azure Application Gateway and Front Door, offering enterprise-grade protection with deep Azure ecosystem integration.
Cloud-native WAAP platform offering fully managed WAF, bot management, and DDoS protection with private cloud deployment options for enhanced data privacy.
Quick Comparison
| Feature | Azure Web Application Firewall | Reblaze (Link11) Web Security |
|---|---|---|
| Overall Rating | 4.2/5 | 4.1/5 |
| Free Tier | No | No |
| Pricing Model | Pay-per-use (gateway hours + data processed) | Custom enterprise pricing |
| Ease of Use | 3.5/5 | 4.0/5 |
| Value for Money | 3.8/5 | 3.6/5 |
| Support | 4.2/5 | 4.4/5 |
| Platforms | Azure Application Gateway, Azure Front Door, Azure CDN, Azure Spring Apps | Any web application, AWS, Azure, GCP, private cloud |
| Compliance | SOC 1/2/3, PCI DSS, HIPAA, FedRAMP High, ISO 27001, ISO 27018 | SOC 2, ISO 27001, GDPR, PCI DSS |
Pricing Comparison
Azure Web Application Firewall
Model: Pay-per-use (gateway hours + data processed)
Application Gateway WAF v2
~$0.443/hour + $0.008/GB
Front Door Standard
$35/month base + usage
Front Door Premium
$330/month base + usage
Reblaze (Link11) Web Security
Model: Custom enterprise pricing
Standard
Custom pricing
Enterprise
Custom pricing
Features Comparison
Azure Web Application Firewall
-
OWASP Core Rule Set
Pre-configured protection against OWASP Top 10 vulnerabilities with regularly updated rule sets.
-
Custom Rules
Create custom rules based on geo-location, IP address, request attributes, and rate limiting.
-
Bot Protection
Managed bot protection ruleset to detect and mitigate malicious bot traffic (Premium tier).
-
Per-Site Policies
Apply different WAF policies to different sites behind the same gateway.
-
Exclusion Lists
Fine-tune rules by excluding specific request attributes to reduce false positives.
-
Geo-Filtering
Allow or block traffic based on country/region of origin.
Reblaze (Link11) Web Security
-
Private Cloud Deployment
Dedicated virtual private cloud per customer eliminates multi-tenant security concerns and enhances data privacy.
-
Machine Learning Detection
ML-powered traffic analysis automatically identifies and blocks malicious requests while allowing legitimate traffic.
-
Bot Management
Advanced bot detection distinguishing between legitimate users, good bots (search engines), and malicious automation.
-
DDoS Protection
Integrated Link11 DDoS mitigation with global scrubbing network for volumetric and application-layer attacks.
-
API Security
Protection for REST and GraphQL APIs with schema validation and anomaly detection.
-
Managed SOC
24/7 Security Operations Center monitoring with expert incident response and threat hunting.
Which One Is Right for You?
The best WAF depends on your specific requirements, infrastructure, and team expertise.
Azure Web Application Firewall
- You need: Azure-native applications, Microsoft enterprise customers, government and regulated industries, global applications needing edge protection
- You're using: Azure Application Gateway, Azure Front Door, Azure CDN, Azure Spring Apps
Reblaze (Link11) Web Security
- You need: European enterprises requiring data sovereignty, organizations wanting managed security services, privacy-conscious deployments
- You're using: Any web application, AWS, Azure, GCP, private cloud
We recommend evaluating both options with a trial or free tier before committing. Consider your existing infrastructure, team expertise, compliance requirements, and budget.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which has better support: Azure Web Application Firewall or Reblaze (Link11) Web Security?
Reblaze (Link11) Web Security has a higher support rating (4.4/5) compared to Azure Web Application Firewall (4.2/5). However, support quality can vary based on your plan tier - enterprise customers typically receive more responsive support from both providers. Consider evaluating support during a trial period.
Which is easier to implement: Azure Web Application Firewall or Reblaze (Link11) Web Security?
Reblaze (Link11) Web Security scores higher for ease of use (4.0/5) versus Azure Web Application Firewall (3.5/5). The actual implementation effort depends on your existing infrastructure and team expertise.
Which is more cost-effective: Azure Web Application Firewall or Reblaze (Link11) Web Security?
Neither provider offers a completely free tier. Azure Web Application Firewall scores higher for value (3.8/5). Total cost depends on your traffic volume, required features, and support level needs.
Which works better with AWS: Azure Web Application Firewall or Reblaze (Link11) Web Security?
Reblaze (Link11) Web Security explicitly supports AWS while Azure Web Application Firewall's AWS integration may vary. Consider whether native AWS integration or cross-cloud portability matters more for your use case.
Which is better for enterprise: Azure Web Application Firewall or Reblaze (Link11) Web Security?
Both Azure Web Application Firewall and Reblaze (Link11) Web Security are well-suited for enterprise deployments. Both offer compliance certifications important for enterprise. Enterprise buyers should evaluate SLAs, support options, and integration capabilities.