Azure Web Application Firewall vs Invicti
Azure Web Application Firewall and Invicti take different approaches to web application security. Consider your team's expertise and infrastructure preferences when evaluating these options.
Azure Web Application Firewall and Invicti take fundamentally different approaches to web application security. Understanding your infrastructure and team capabilities will help determine which approach fits your needs.
Overview
Azure Web Application Firewall and Invicti are both popular web application firewall solutions. This comparison will help you understand the key differences and choose the right one for your needs.
Microsoft's cloud-native WAF integrated with Azure Application Gateway and Front Door, offering enterprise-grade protection with deep Azure ecosystem integration.
Application security testing platform offering DAST and IAST scanning. Formerly Netsparker. Products include Invicti (enterprise DAST) and Acunetix (SMB DAST). Not a WAF, but a vulnerability scanner that finds the vulnerabilities WAFs protect against. OWASP Gold sponsor. Proof-based scanning reduces false positives. Custom enterprise pricing.
Quick Comparison
| Feature | Azure Web Application Firewall | Invicti |
|---|---|---|
| Overall Rating | 4.2/5 | 3.8/5 |
| Free Tier | No | No |
| Pricing Model | Pay-per-use (gateway hours + data processed) | Custom (enterprise, annual contract) |
| Ease of Use | 3.5/5 | 3.5/5 |
| Value for Money | 3.8/5 | 3.3/5 |
| Support | 4.2/5 | 4.0/5 |
| Platforms | Azure Application Gateway, Azure Front Door, Azure CDN, Azure Spring Apps | Scans any web application accessible via HTTP/HTTPS. Supports REST APIs, GraphQL, SOAP, single-page applications (React, Angular, Vue), and traditional server-rendered applications. On-premises scanner available for internal applications. |
| Compliance | SOC 1/2/3, PCI DSS, HIPAA, FedRAMP High, ISO 27001, ISO 27018 | SOC 2 Type 2, helps with PCI DSS, HIPAA, ISO 27001, GDPR compliance scanning |
Pricing Comparison
Azure Web Application Firewall
Model: Pay-per-use (gateway hours + data processed)
Application Gateway WAF v2
~$0.443/hour + $0.008/GB
Front Door Standard
$35/month base + usage
Front Door Premium
$330/month base + usage
Invicti
Model: Custom (enterprise, annual contract)
Acunetix (SMB)
Custom (starts ~$4,500/year)
Invicti (Enterprise)
Custom (annual contract)
Features Comparison
Azure Web Application Firewall
-
OWASP Core Rule Set
Pre-configured protection against OWASP Top 10 vulnerabilities with regularly updated rule sets.
-
Custom Rules
Create custom rules based on geo-location, IP address, request attributes, and rate limiting.
-
Bot Protection
Managed bot protection ruleset to detect and mitigate malicious bot traffic (Premium tier).
-
Per-Site Policies
Apply different WAF policies to different sites behind the same gateway.
-
Exclusion Lists
Fine-tune rules by excluding specific request attributes to reduce false positives.
-
Geo-Filtering
Allow or block traffic based on country/region of origin.
Invicti
-
Proof-Based Scanning
When a vulnerability is found, Invicti attempts to safely exploit it and provides concrete proof. For SQL injection, it extracts actual data. For file inclusion, it reads a specific file. This eliminates the false positive problem that plagues most security scanners.
-
DAST (Dynamic Application Security Testing)
Tests running web applications by sending crafted HTTP requests and analyzing responses. Finds SQL injection, XSS, CSRF, file inclusion, authentication flaws, and other OWASP Top 10 vulnerabilities in production or staging environments.
-
IAST (Interactive Application Security Testing)
Instruments the application at runtime to provide deeper vulnerability detection. Combines external scanning with internal application visibility. Finds vulnerabilities that pure DAST scanning might miss, such as insecure deserialization or business logic flaws.
-
API Security Testing
Scans REST APIs, GraphQL endpoints, and SOAP services. Imports API definitions (OpenAPI/Swagger, WSDL, GraphQL schemas) and tests all endpoints for vulnerabilities. Critical for modern applications where APIs are the primary attack surface.
-
CI/CD Pipeline Integration
Integrates with Jenkins, Azure DevOps, GitHub Actions, GitLab CI, and other CI/CD platforms. Automatically scans applications as part of the deployment pipeline. Fails builds if critical vulnerabilities are found.
-
WAF Rule Export
Exports discovered vulnerabilities as WAF rules that can be imported into WAF products. Creates targeted virtual patches for specific vulnerabilities found during scanning. Bridges the gap between vulnerability discovery and runtime mitigation.
-
Compliance Reporting
Generates compliance reports mapped to PCI DSS, HIPAA, ISO 27001, and OWASP Top 10 requirements. Useful for demonstrating due diligence during audits and regulatory reviews.
-
Single-Page Application Support
Full support for scanning modern JavaScript applications built with React, Angular, or Vue. Invicti executes JavaScript, interacts with dynamic page elements, and discovers application states that traditional crawlers miss.
Which One Is Right for You?
The best WAF depends on your specific requirements, infrastructure, and team expertise.
Azure Web Application Firewall
- You need: Azure-native applications, Microsoft enterprise customers, government and regulated industries, global applications needing edge protection
- You're using: Azure Application Gateway, Azure Front Door, Azure CDN, Azure Spring Apps
Invicti
- You need: Enterprise security teams evaluating WAF effectiveness against actual application vulnerabilities. DevSecOps teams wanting automated vulnerability scanning in CI/CD pipelines. Organizations needing compliance scanning for PCI DSS, HIPAA, or ISO 27001. Security consultants performing application security assessments.
- You're using: Scans any web application accessible via HTTP/HTTPS. Supports REST APIs, GraphQL, SOAP, single-page applications (React, Angular, Vue), and traditional server-rendered applications. On-premises scanner available for internal applications.
We recommend evaluating both options with a trial or free tier before committing. Consider your existing infrastructure, team expertise, compliance requirements, and budget.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which has better support: Azure Web Application Firewall or Invicti?
Azure Web Application Firewall has a higher support rating (4.2/5) compared to Invicti (4.0/5). However, support quality can vary based on your plan tier - enterprise customers typically receive more responsive support from both providers. Consider evaluating support during a trial period.
Which is easier to implement: Azure Web Application Firewall or Invicti?
Invicti scores higher for ease of use (3.5/5) versus Azure Web Application Firewall (3.5/5). The actual implementation effort depends on your existing infrastructure and team expertise.
Which is more cost-effective: Azure Web Application Firewall or Invicti?
Neither provider offers a completely free tier. Azure Web Application Firewall scores higher for value (3.8/5). Total cost depends on your traffic volume, required features, and support level needs.
Which is better for enterprise: Azure Web Application Firewall or Invicti?
Both Azure Web Application Firewall and Invicti are well-suited for enterprise deployments. Both offer compliance certifications important for enterprise. Enterprise buyers should evaluate SLAs, support options, and integration capabilities.