WAFPlanet

All-In-One Security (AIOS) vs Kong Gateway WAF

All-In-One Security (AIOS) and Kong Gateway WAF take different approaches to web application security. Consider your team's expertise and infrastructure preferences when evaluating these options.

View All-In-One Security (AIOS) Review View Kong Gateway WAF Review

All-In-One Security (AIOS) and Kong Gateway WAF take fundamentally different approaches to web application security. Understanding your infrastructure and team capabilities will help determine which approach fits your needs.

Overview

All-In-One Security (AIOS) and Kong Gateway WAF are both popular web application firewall solutions. This comparison will help you understand the key differences and choose the right one for your needs.

Comprehensive free WordPress security plugin with PHP-based firewall, .htaccess hardening, login lockdown, and 6G blacklist rules protecting over one million sites.

API gateway with built-in WAF plugin for enterprise customers. Kong is the most popular open source API gateway (35K+ GitHub stars, 312M+ downloads) built on NGINX, processing 400B+ API calls daily. The WAF plugin is an Enterprise-only add-on that protects API endpoints at the gateway layer.

Quick Comparison

Feature All-In-One Security (AIOS) Kong Gateway WAF
Overall Rating 3.9/5 3.8/5
Free Tier Yes No
Pricing Model Freemium (Free tier with nearly full features + Premium add-ons) Tiered (Plus per-gateway + Enterprise custom)
Ease of Use 4.5/5 3.2/5
Value for Money 4.6/5 3.0/5
Support 3.7/5 4.2/5
Open Source Yes No
Platforms WordPress (self-hosted) Linux (Ubuntu, RHEL, Debian, Amazon Linux, Alpine), Docker, Kubernetes (via Ingress Controller and Operator), AWS, Azure, GCP, ARM64, macOS (dev)
Compliance Contact vendor SOC 2 Type II, FIPS 140-2 (Enterprise data planes), supports PCI DSS and HIPAA compliance

Pricing Comparison

All-In-One Security (AIOS)

Model: Freemium (Free tier with nearly full features + Premium add-ons)

Free Tier Available

Free

$0

Premium (2 sites)

$70/year (~$5.83/month)

Premium (unlimited sites)

$200/year (~$16.67/month)

View full pricing →

Kong Gateway WAF

Model: Tiered (Plus per-gateway + Enterprise custom)

Kong Gateway OSS

Free

Kong Konnect Plus

From $225/mo

Kong Konnect Enterprise

Custom (annual)

Dedicated Cloud Gateway

$500/mo per control plane + $0.15/GB

View full pricing →

Features Comparison

All-In-One Security (AIOS)

  • PHP Firewall

    Application-level firewall with configurable rules that filter malicious requests at the PHP level.

  • 6G Blacklist Firewall

    Industry-standard 6G blacklist rules blocking malicious URL patterns, referrers, and user agents via .htaccess.

  • Login Lockdown

    Locks out IP addresses after repeated failed login attempts with configurable thresholds and lockout duration.

  • Security Strength Meter

    Visual scoring system showing your site''s security posture with actionable recommendations for improvement.

  • File Change Detection

    Monitors WordPress core files and alerts when changes are detected that could indicate compromise.

  • Database Security

    Database table prefix changing, scheduled backups, and protection against SQL injection attacks.

  • Comment Spam Protection

    Blocks spam comments using CAPTCHA, honeypot fields, and IP-based filtering.

Kong Gateway WAF

  • Gateway-Embedded WAF

    WAF runs as a plugin inside the Kong Gateway process, inspecting API traffic at the same layer where routing, authentication, and rate limiting occur. No separate WAF appliance or additional proxy hop needed.

  • OWASP Top 10 Protection

    Built-in protection against common web application attacks including SQL injection, cross-site scripting, command injection, and path traversal at the API gateway layer.

  • Plugin Ecosystem

    Over 100 plugins for security, traffic control, authentication, and observability. WAF works alongside bot detection, IP restriction, CORS, ACL, and rate limiting plugins in a configurable execution chain.

  • Third-Party WAF Integrations

    Open plugin architecture supports third-party WAF engines including open-appsec (ML-driven detection) and Wallarm (API security). Teams can choose the WAF engine that fits their threat model.

  • Kubernetes-Native Deployment

    Kong Ingress Controller and Kong Kubernetes Operator provide native Kubernetes integration. WAF policies can be managed declaratively through Kubernetes CRDs alongside gateway configuration.

  • Hybrid Mode

    Cloud-managed control plane with self-hosted data planes. WAF policies are centrally managed and distributed to data planes running in any environment, including air-gapped networks.

  • AI Gateway

    Dedicated AI gateway capabilities including LLM proxy, token-based rate limiting, semantic caching, PII sanitization, prompt guardrails, and MCP server proxy. WAF protects AI endpoints alongside traditional APIs.

  • Declarative Configuration

    Gateway and WAF configuration can be managed as code through declarative YAML/JSON, enabling GitOps workflows and CI/CD pipeline integration for security policy changes.

  • Advanced Rate Limiting

    Enterprise-grade rate limiting with sliding window counters, consumer groups, and cluster-wide synchronization. Works in conjunction with WAF to prevent both application-layer attacks and abuse.

Which One Is Right for You?

The best WAF depends on your specific requirements, infrastructure, and team expertise.

All-In-One Security (AIOS)

  • You need: Budget-conscious WordPress site owners, beginners wanting accessible security, sites on Apache hosting needing .htaccess-based protection
  • You want to start with a free tier
  • You prefer open-source solutions
  • You're using: WordPress (self-hosted)
Learn more →

Kong Gateway WAF

  • You need: Organizations already using Kong as their API gateway, Kubernetes-native architectures needing gateway-level WAF, teams wanting unified API management and security in one platform, enterprises with microservices architectures routing all traffic through an API gateway
  • You're using: Linux (Ubuntu, RHEL, Debian, Amazon Linux, Alpine), Docker, Kubernetes (via Ingress Controller and Operator), AWS, Azure, GCP, ARM64, macOS (dev)
Learn more →

We recommend evaluating both options with a trial or free tier before committing. Consider your existing infrastructure, team expertise, compliance requirements, and budget.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better for startups: All-In-One Security (AIOS) or Kong Gateway WAF?

All-In-One Security (AIOS) offers a free tier while Kong Gateway WAF does not, which may be important for early-stage startups. All-In-One Security (AIOS) scores higher for ease of use (4.5/5), which is valuable for smaller teams. Consider your immediate security needs and growth plans when choosing.

Which has better support: All-In-One Security (AIOS) or Kong Gateway WAF?

Kong Gateway WAF has a higher support rating (4.2/5) compared to All-In-One Security (AIOS) (3.7/5). However, support quality can vary based on your plan tier - enterprise customers typically receive more responsive support from both providers. Consider evaluating support during a trial period.

Which is easier to implement: All-In-One Security (AIOS) or Kong Gateway WAF?

All-In-One Security (AIOS) scores higher for ease of use (4.5/5) versus Kong Gateway WAF (3.2/5). The actual implementation effort depends on your existing infrastructure and team expertise.

Which is more cost-effective: All-In-One Security (AIOS) or Kong Gateway WAF?

All-In-One Security (AIOS) offers a free tier while Kong Gateway WAF requires a paid plan. All-In-One Security (AIOS) scores higher for value (4.6/5). Total cost depends on your traffic volume, required features, and support level needs.

Which works better with AWS: All-In-One Security (AIOS) or Kong Gateway WAF?

Kong Gateway WAF explicitly supports AWS while All-In-One Security (AIOS)'s AWS integration may vary. Consider whether native AWS integration or cross-cloud portability matters more for your use case.